Jordan Baeker Bispo, Jessica Star, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami
{"title":"Unmet Social Needs and Trust in Cancer Information From Health Authorities: Findings From the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.","authors":"Jordan Baeker Bispo, Jessica Star, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami","doi":"10.1002/pon.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trust in public health messaging bolsters participation in preventive services like cancer screening and vaccination. Social inequality may drive mistrust in health authorities, but little is known about this relationship in the context of cancer messaging.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine associations between unmet social needs and trust in sources of cancer information using nationally representative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The main exposure was number of unmet social needs (0, 1 or ≥ 2), tabulated from survey items on housing, transportation and food insecurity. Dependent variables included binary indicators of trust (high vs. low) in cancer information from doctors, scientists and government agencies, and trust in the healthcare system overall. Associations were evaluated using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doctors were the most trusted source of cancer information (72.6%), followed by scientists (56.9%) and government agencies (29.2%). Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors; in adjusted models, the odds were 39% lower (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43-0.86) for respondents with 1 unmet need, and 51% lower (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.70) for those with ≥ 2 relative to those with none. A minority (36.1%) of respondents reported high trust in the healthcare system overall, with 61% lower odds among those with ≥ 2 unmet needs (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25-0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors and the healthcare system. Addressing social needs in the clinical setting may enhance patient trust in cancer messaging from providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Trust in public health messaging bolsters participation in preventive services like cancer screening and vaccination. Social inequality may drive mistrust in health authorities, but little is known about this relationship in the context of cancer messaging.
Aims: To examine associations between unmet social needs and trust in sources of cancer information using nationally representative data.
Methods: Data were from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The main exposure was number of unmet social needs (0, 1 or ≥ 2), tabulated from survey items on housing, transportation and food insecurity. Dependent variables included binary indicators of trust (high vs. low) in cancer information from doctors, scientists and government agencies, and trust in the healthcare system overall. Associations were evaluated using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: Doctors were the most trusted source of cancer information (72.6%), followed by scientists (56.9%) and government agencies (29.2%). Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors; in adjusted models, the odds were 39% lower (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43-0.86) for respondents with 1 unmet need, and 51% lower (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.70) for those with ≥ 2 relative to those with none. A minority (36.1%) of respondents reported high trust in the healthcare system overall, with 61% lower odds among those with ≥ 2 unmet needs (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25-0.62).
Conclusion: Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors and the healthcare system. Addressing social needs in the clinical setting may enhance patient trust in cancer messaging from providers.
期刊介绍:
Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology.
This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues.
Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.