Unmet Social Needs and Trust in Cancer Information From Health Authorities: Findings From the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Jordan Baeker Bispo, Jessica Star, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami
{"title":"Unmet Social Needs and Trust in Cancer Information From Health Authorities: Findings From the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.","authors":"Jordan Baeker Bispo, Jessica Star, Ahmedin Jemal, Farhad Islami","doi":"10.1002/pon.70227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trust in public health messaging bolsters participation in preventive services like cancer screening and vaccination. Social inequality may drive mistrust in health authorities, but little is known about this relationship in the context of cancer messaging.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine associations between unmet social needs and trust in sources of cancer information using nationally representative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The main exposure was number of unmet social needs (0, 1 or ≥ 2), tabulated from survey items on housing, transportation and food insecurity. Dependent variables included binary indicators of trust (high vs. low) in cancer information from doctors, scientists and government agencies, and trust in the healthcare system overall. Associations were evaluated using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Doctors were the most trusted source of cancer information (72.6%), followed by scientists (56.9%) and government agencies (29.2%). Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors; in adjusted models, the odds were 39% lower (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43-0.86) for respondents with 1 unmet need, and 51% lower (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.70) for those with ≥ 2 relative to those with none. A minority (36.1%) of respondents reported high trust in the healthcare system overall, with 61% lower odds among those with ≥ 2 unmet needs (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25-0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors and the healthcare system. Addressing social needs in the clinical setting may enhance patient trust in cancer messaging from providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"34 8","pages":"e70227"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trust in public health messaging bolsters participation in preventive services like cancer screening and vaccination. Social inequality may drive mistrust in health authorities, but little is known about this relationship in the context of cancer messaging.

Aims: To examine associations between unmet social needs and trust in sources of cancer information using nationally representative data.

Methods: Data were from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The main exposure was number of unmet social needs (0, 1 or ≥ 2), tabulated from survey items on housing, transportation and food insecurity. Dependent variables included binary indicators of trust (high vs. low) in cancer information from doctors, scientists and government agencies, and trust in the healthcare system overall. Associations were evaluated using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression with adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: Doctors were the most trusted source of cancer information (72.6%), followed by scientists (56.9%) and government agencies (29.2%). Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors; in adjusted models, the odds were 39% lower (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43-0.86) for respondents with 1 unmet need, and 51% lower (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.70) for those with ≥ 2 relative to those with none. A minority (36.1%) of respondents reported high trust in the healthcare system overall, with 61% lower odds among those with ≥ 2 unmet needs (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25-0.62).

Conclusion: Unmet social needs were associated with reduced trust in cancer information from doctors and the healthcare system. Addressing social needs in the clinical setting may enhance patient trust in cancer messaging from providers.

未满足的社会需求和对来自卫生当局的癌症信息的信任:来自2022年健康信息全国趋势调查的结果。
背景:对公共卫生信息的信任促进了对癌症筛查和疫苗接种等预防服务的参与。社会不平等可能导致卫生当局不信任,但在癌症信息传递的背景下,人们对这种关系知之甚少。目的:利用具有全国代表性的数据,研究未满足的社会需求与对癌症信息来源的信任之间的关系。方法:数据来自《2022年健康信息全国趋势调查》。主要暴露是未满足社会需求的数量(0,1或≥2),从住房、交通和粮食不安全的调查项目中制表。因变量包括对医生、科学家和政府机构提供的癌症信息的信任(高与低)的二元指标,以及对整个医疗体系的信任。使用调查加权的多变量逻辑回归对社会人口统计学特征进行调整。结果:医生是最受信任的癌症信息来源(72.6%),其次是科学家(56.9%)和政府机构(29.2%)。未满足的社会需求与医生对癌症信息的信任度降低有关;在调整后的模型中,有1项未满足需求的被调查者比无需求的被调查者低39% (aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43-0.86),有≥2项未满足需求的被调查者比无需求的被调查者低51% (aOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.35-0.70)。少数(36.1%)的受访者表示对医疗保健系统总体上有很高的信任度,在有≥2个未满足需求的人群中,信任度降低了61% (aOR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.25-0.62)。结论:未满足的社会需求与医生和医疗保健系统对癌症信息的信任度降低有关。在临床环境中解决社会需求可能会增强患者对提供者癌症信息的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信