Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): table templates for effective communication.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ellen B M Elsman, Maarten Boers, Caroline B Terwee, Dorcas Beaton, Inger Abma, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Alessandro Chiarotto, Kirstie Haywood, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Ava Mehdipour, Diana M Oosterveer, Lidwine B Mokkink, Martin Offringa
{"title":"Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): table templates for effective communication.","authors":"Ellen B M Elsman, Maarten Boers, Caroline B Terwee, Dorcas Beaton, Inger Abma, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Alessandro Chiarotto, Kirstie Haywood, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Ava Mehdipour, Diana M Oosterveer, Lidwine B Mokkink, Martin Offringa","doi":"10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are an important tool to guide the selection of OMIs for research and clinical practice. However, presenting the large amount of complex data pertaining both to the quality of each study (i.e., risk of bias) as well as the quality of the instrument (i.e., measurement properties), along with the underpinning certainty of evidence, is challenging. Here, we aim to provide guidance on optimizing data presentation in OMI systematic reviews, specifically focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team of experts in OMI systematic reviews, research reporting, and data visualization built on existing table templates from OMERACT and the COSMIN initiative, to align with reporting items in a recently developed reporting guideline for systematic reviews of OMIs: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. To enhance clarity and usability, we applied data visualization principles by reducing non-essential elements and improving interpretability through structured layouts and concise explanatory text.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present eight templates for reporting PROM systematic review results: three pertain to PROM characteristics, two to studies' characteristics, two to the evaluation of measurement properties, and one to the summary of findings. We also provide recommendations on whether to include these templates in the review's main manuscript or in the supplementary materials. Word versions of these templates can be downloaded from www.prisma-cosmin.ca and www.cosmin.nl .</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Templates complementing the PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 reporting guidance can be used to standardize and enhance the clarity and usefulness of OMI systematic reviews focusing on PROMs. They comprise a comprehensive set of tools to effectively report OMI systematic reviews, in service of end-users who are selecting OMIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are an important tool to guide the selection of OMIs for research and clinical practice. However, presenting the large amount of complex data pertaining both to the quality of each study (i.e., risk of bias) as well as the quality of the instrument (i.e., measurement properties), along with the underpinning certainty of evidence, is challenging. Here, we aim to provide guidance on optimizing data presentation in OMI systematic reviews, specifically focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods: A multidisciplinary team of experts in OMI systematic reviews, research reporting, and data visualization built on existing table templates from OMERACT and the COSMIN initiative, to align with reporting items in a recently developed reporting guideline for systematic reviews of OMIs: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. To enhance clarity and usability, we applied data visualization principles by reducing non-essential elements and improving interpretability through structured layouts and concise explanatory text.

Results: We present eight templates for reporting PROM systematic review results: three pertain to PROM characteristics, two to studies' characteristics, two to the evaluation of measurement properties, and one to the summary of findings. We also provide recommendations on whether to include these templates in the review's main manuscript or in the supplementary materials. Word versions of these templates can be downloaded from www.prisma-cosmin.ca and www.cosmin.nl .

Conclusion: Templates complementing the PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 reporting guidance can be used to standardize and enhance the clarity and usefulness of OMI systematic reviews focusing on PROMs. They comprise a comprehensive set of tools to effectively report OMI systematic reviews, in service of end-users who are selecting OMIs.

病人报告的结果测量(PROMs)的系统评价:有效沟通的表格模板。
目的:结局测量工具(OMIs)的系统评价是指导研究和临床实践中OMIs选择的重要工具。然而,呈现与每项研究的质量(即偏倚风险)以及仪器的质量(即测量特性)有关的大量复杂数据,以及证据的基础确定性,是具有挑战性的。在这里,我们的目标是为优化OMI系统评价中的数据呈现提供指导,特别是关注患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。方法:一个由OMI系统评价、研究报告和数据可视化专家组成的多学科团队,基于OMERACT和COSMIN计划的现有表格模板,与最近制定的OMI系统评价报告指南中的报告项目保持一致:prism -COSMIN for OMIs 2024。为了提高清晰度和可用性,我们应用了数据可视化原则,减少了不必要的元素,并通过结构化布局和简明的解释性文本提高了可解释性。结果:我们提出了8个报告PROM系统评价结果的模板:3个与PROM特征有关,2个与研究特征有关,2个与测量特性评估有关,1个与结果总结有关。我们还就是否将这些模板包含在综述的主要手稿或补充材料中提供建议。这些模板的Word版本可以从www.prisma-cosmin.ca和www.cosmin.nl下载。结论:与prism - cosmin 2024报告指南相补充的模板可用于规范和提高以PROMs为重点的OMI系统评价的清晰度和实用性。它们包括一套全面的工具,可以有效地报告OMI系统审查情况,为选择OMI的最终用户提供服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信