Using protection motivation theory to support patient adherence in healthcare settings: A scoping review.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0330883
Olivia Hawksworth, Jemima Solt, Dowon Jang, Paul Norman, Daniel Hind, Raveen Jayasuriya
{"title":"Using protection motivation theory to support patient adherence in healthcare settings: A scoping review.","authors":"Olivia Hawksworth, Jemima Solt, Dowon Jang, Paul Norman, Daniel Hind, Raveen Jayasuriya","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0330883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Protection motivation theory (PMT) shows promise as a basis for motivating healthy behaviours in healthcare settings. There has been no systematic overview of how PMT has been translated into clinical practice and which translation strategies effectively improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesise existing literature on PMT-based interventions targeting health behaviours in healthcare contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for studies applying PMT within healthcare contexts. Eligible populations had a clinical condition. To be eligible, studies had to report a healthcare-delivered PMT intervention with adherence outcomes directly benefiting participants. Two reviewers extracted data on study features, intervention characteristics including behaviour change techniques employed, PMT constructs addressed, results, and research recommendations. Findings were summarised narratively and tabulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies published between 1998 and 2023 met the eligibility criteria, including 12 randomised trials. Studies addressed acute and chronic conditions across primary, secondary, and non-clinical settings. Half significantly improved behaviour outcomes in intervention groups. All targeted coping-self-efficacy and perceived threat-severity PMT constructs to some degree. Combinations of behaviour change techniques did not clearly differentiate successful outcomes. Studies recommended longer follow-up, clarifying effective PMT component combinations, and drawing on multiple behaviour theories.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite heterogeneity in how PMT interventions were operationalised, they show potential benefits for motivating adherence to healthy behaviours. To enable optimisation and dissemination, consistent nonadherence detection and reporting methods are critical. Further research should include translation of PMT to other healthcare settings, refining methodology and implementing well-powered effectiveness trials in routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 9","pages":"e0330883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330883","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Protection motivation theory (PMT) shows promise as a basis for motivating healthy behaviours in healthcare settings. There has been no systematic overview of how PMT has been translated into clinical practice and which translation strategies effectively improve outcomes.

Objectives: This scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesise existing literature on PMT-based interventions targeting health behaviours in healthcare contexts.

Methods: Medline, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for studies applying PMT within healthcare contexts. Eligible populations had a clinical condition. To be eligible, studies had to report a healthcare-delivered PMT intervention with adherence outcomes directly benefiting participants. Two reviewers extracted data on study features, intervention characteristics including behaviour change techniques employed, PMT constructs addressed, results, and research recommendations. Findings were summarised narratively and tabulated.

Results: Thirteen studies published between 1998 and 2023 met the eligibility criteria, including 12 randomised trials. Studies addressed acute and chronic conditions across primary, secondary, and non-clinical settings. Half significantly improved behaviour outcomes in intervention groups. All targeted coping-self-efficacy and perceived threat-severity PMT constructs to some degree. Combinations of behaviour change techniques did not clearly differentiate successful outcomes. Studies recommended longer follow-up, clarifying effective PMT component combinations, and drawing on multiple behaviour theories.

Discussion: Despite heterogeneity in how PMT interventions were operationalised, they show potential benefits for motivating adherence to healthy behaviours. To enable optimisation and dissemination, consistent nonadherence detection and reporting methods are critical. Further research should include translation of PMT to other healthcare settings, refining methodology and implementing well-powered effectiveness trials in routine care.

使用保护动机理论支持患者依从性在医疗保健设置:范围审查。
背景:保护动机理论(PMT)显示了在医疗保健环境中激励健康行为的基础。目前还没有关于PMT如何转化为临床实践以及哪些转化策略有效改善结果的系统概述。目的:本范围审查旨在系统地绘制和综合现有文献基于pmt干预针对卫生保健环境中的健康行为。方法:检索Medline、PsycINFO和EMBASE,查找在医疗环境中应用PMT的研究。符合条件的人群有临床状况。为了符合条件,研究必须报告医疗保健提供的PMT干预措施,并且依从性结果直接使参与者受益。两位审稿人提取了研究特征、干预特征(包括采用的行为改变技术、处理的PMT结构、结果和研究建议)的数据。研究结果以叙述方式总结并制成表格。结果:1998年至2023年间发表的13项研究符合入选标准,其中包括12项随机试验。研究涉及原发性、继发性和非临床情况下的急性和慢性疾病。干预组中有一半人的行为结果显著改善。所有的目标应对-自我效能和感知威胁-严重性PMT都在一定程度上建构。行为改变技术的组合并没有明确区分成功的结果。研究建议延长随访时间,阐明有效的PMT成分组合,并借鉴多种行为理论。讨论:尽管PMT干预措施的操作方式存在异质性,但它们在激励坚持健康行为方面显示出潜在的益处。为了实现优化和传播,一致的不依从检测和报告方法至关重要。进一步的研究应包括将PMT转化为其他医疗机构,改进方法并在常规护理中实施强有力的有效性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信