The Impact of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Supplementation on Diabetes and Obesity Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Ying Fan, Lei Wu, Yalan Zhang, Qin Hu, Jing Mei, Kousalya Prabahar, Benjamin Hernández-Wolters, Hamed Kord-Varkaneh, Changjiang Lei, Su Zheng
{"title":"The Impact of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Supplementation on Diabetes and Obesity Biomarkers in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ying Fan, Lei Wu, Yalan Zhang, Qin Hu, Jing Mei, Kousalya Prabahar, Benjamin Hernández-Wolters, Hamed Kord-Varkaneh, Changjiang Lei, Su Zheng","doi":"10.1002/ptr.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effects of okra on diabetes biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes. These inconsistencies may stem from factors such as dosage, intervention duration, and study design. To address these discrepancies, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the effects of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) supplementation on diabetes and obesity markers in patients with type 2 diabetes. Relevant studies published up to July 15, 2024, were identified through comprehensive searches in databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Studies were included if they assessed the effects of okra supplementation on diabetes and obesity biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes. A random-effects model was employed to calculate effect sizes, reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of six eligible RCTs was included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that okra supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood glucose (FBG) (WMD: -21.72 mg/dL, 95% CI: -36.86 to -6.58, p = 0.005) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (WMD: -0.42%, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.19, p < 0.001). However, no significant effects were observed on insulin levels (WMD: 0.54 μU/mL, 95% CI: -1.03 to 2.12, p = 0.498), insulin resistance as assessed by HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -1.37 to 0.75, p = 0.566), body mass index (BMI) (WMD: -0.24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95% CI: -0.62 to 0.14, p = 0.220), or body weight (WMD: -0.83 kg, 95% CI: -2.55 to 0.87, p = 0.338). This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to confirm the positive effects of okra supplementation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, specifically by reducing FBG and HbA1c levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":20110,"journal":{"name":"Phytotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.70071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effects of okra on diabetes biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes. These inconsistencies may stem from factors such as dosage, intervention duration, and study design. To address these discrepancies, this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the effects of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) supplementation on diabetes and obesity markers in patients with type 2 diabetes. Relevant studies published up to July 15, 2024, were identified through comprehensive searches in databases including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Studies were included if they assessed the effects of okra supplementation on diabetes and obesity biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes. A random-effects model was employed to calculate effect sizes, reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of six eligible RCTs was included in the final analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that okra supplementation significantly reduced fasting blood glucose (FBG) (WMD: -21.72 mg/dL, 95% CI: -36.86 to -6.58, p = 0.005) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (WMD: -0.42%, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.19, p < 0.001). However, no significant effects were observed on insulin levels (WMD: 0.54 μU/mL, 95% CI: -1.03 to 2.12, p = 0.498), insulin resistance as assessed by HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.31, 95% CI: -1.37 to 0.75, p = 0.566), body mass index (BMI) (WMD: -0.24 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.62 to 0.14, p = 0.220), or body weight (WMD: -0.83 kg, 95% CI: -2.55 to 0.87, p = 0.338). This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to confirm the positive effects of okra supplementation on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, specifically by reducing FBG and HbA1c levels.

补充秋葵对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病和肥胖生物标志物的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
关于秋葵对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病生物标志物的影响,报道了相互矛盾的结果。这些不一致可能源于剂量、干预持续时间和研究设计等因素。为了解决这些差异,本研究对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估秋葵(Abelmoschus esculentus)补充剂对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病和肥胖标志物的影响。通过对Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed/Medline、Embase等数据库的综合检索,确定了截止到2024年7月15日发表的相关研究。如果研究评估了秋葵补充剂对2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病和肥胖生物标志物的影响,则纳入研究。采用随机效应模型计算效应大小,报告为加权平均差异(WMD), 95%置信区间(CI)。最终分析共纳入6项符合条件的随机对照试验。荟萃分析显示,补充秋葵可显著降低空腹血糖(FBG) (WMD: -21.72 mg/dL, 95% CI: -36.86至-6.58,p = 0.005)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平(WMD: -0.42%, 95% CI: -0.64至-0.19,p = 2, 95% CI: -0.62至0.14,p = 0.220)或体重(WMD: -0.83 kg, 95% CI: -2.55至0.87,p = 0.338)。这项系统综述和荟萃分析首次证实了秋葵补充剂对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的积极作用,特别是通过降低FBG和HbA1c水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phytotherapy Research
Phytotherapy Research 医学-药学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
325
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Phytotherapy Research is an internationally recognized pharmacological journal that serves as a trailblazing resource for biochemists, pharmacologists, and toxicologists. We strive to disseminate groundbreaking research on medicinal plants, pushing the boundaries of knowledge and understanding in this field. Our primary focus areas encompass pharmacology, toxicology, and the clinical applications of herbs and natural products in medicine. We actively encourage submissions on the effects of commonly consumed food ingredients and standardized plant extracts. We welcome a range of contributions including original research papers, review articles, and letters. By providing a platform for the latest developments and discoveries in phytotherapy, we aim to support the advancement of scientific knowledge and contribute to the improvement of modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信