Mariana Bueno Manini, Natali Caroline da Silva, Rafaela Agra de Castro, Milena Baptistella Grotta, Adyleia A D Contrera Toro
{"title":"Is Palivizumabe a Protective Factor for the Development of Asthma in Children? A Systematic Review With Metanalysis.","authors":"Mariana Bueno Manini, Natali Caroline da Silva, Rafaela Agra de Castro, Milena Baptistella Grotta, Adyleia A D Contrera Toro","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Premature infants are at increased risk of developing chronic respiratory diseases, predisposing them to severe infections, such as those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Palivizumab reduces the severity of RSV infections in high-risk children; however, its relationship with asthma development in premature infants remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to review the literature and assess whether prophylaxis with palivizumab protects premature infants without congenital heart disease from developing asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, assessing 1,364,238 children; of these, 9232 received palivizumab. No significant difference in the chance of developing asthma between the groups (odds ratio (OR) of 0.84, 95% CI [0.62-1.13], p = 0.1968). Heterogeneity between studies was I² = 35.6%. Subgroup analysis for children with a family history of atopy showed no significant reduction in asthma risk (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.55, p = 0.3390). Sensitivity analysis confirmed result robustness. IgE levels were similar between the groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03 [95% CI: -0.30; 0.23], p = 0.8088). Children who received palivizumab were diagnosed younger (SMD -0.24 [95% CI: -0.38; -0.09], p = 0.0014), with lower gestational age (MD -0.75 [95% CI: -1.61; 0.12], p = 0.0915).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palivizumab prophylaxis does not reduce asthma risk in premature children without congenital heart disease. Its primary benefit lies in preventing severe RSV infections, with no direct impact on asthma developing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 8","pages":"e71242"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Premature infants are at increased risk of developing chronic respiratory diseases, predisposing them to severe infections, such as those caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Palivizumab reduces the severity of RSV infections in high-risk children; however, its relationship with asthma development in premature infants remains unclear.
Objective: This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to review the literature and assess whether prophylaxis with palivizumab protects premature infants without congenital heart disease from developing asthma.
Results: In total, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, assessing 1,364,238 children; of these, 9232 received palivizumab. No significant difference in the chance of developing asthma between the groups (odds ratio (OR) of 0.84, 95% CI [0.62-1.13], p = 0.1968). Heterogeneity between studies was I² = 35.6%. Subgroup analysis for children with a family history of atopy showed no significant reduction in asthma risk (OR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.40-1.55, p = 0.3390). Sensitivity analysis confirmed result robustness. IgE levels were similar between the groups (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.03 [95% CI: -0.30; 0.23], p = 0.8088). Children who received palivizumab were diagnosed younger (SMD -0.24 [95% CI: -0.38; -0.09], p = 0.0014), with lower gestational age (MD -0.75 [95% CI: -1.61; 0.12], p = 0.0915).
Conclusions: Palivizumab prophylaxis does not reduce asthma risk in premature children without congenital heart disease. Its primary benefit lies in preventing severe RSV infections, with no direct impact on asthma developing.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.