Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-08-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S539717
Mingyang Qian, Wei Jiang, Qingsong Zou, Wenlin Cheng, Mengyi Xu, Li Hua, Jiangming Yu
{"title":"Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Mingyang Qian, Wei Jiang, Qingsong Zou, Wenlin Cheng, Mengyi Xu, Li Hua, Jiangming Yu","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S539717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore the experiences and pivotal influencing factors of patients with Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during the surgical decision-making phase to provide a basis for optimizing the shared decision-making between medical professionals and patients and for the implementation of personalized nursing care.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This phenomenological study employed face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling method was used to select 20 patients with lumbar disc herniation from the orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital. The interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings of this study revealed that the surgical decision-making experiences of patients with LDH can be delineated into four themes: (1) Motivations underlying the surgical Decision; (2) Decision-making dilemmas arising from insufficient patient information; (3) The multi-dimensional factors influencing decision-making, and (4) Patients express unmet peri-operative needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reveals that surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar disc herniation is a complex process involving the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors. It is essential to establish a patient-centered decision-support system, integrating structured information tools, psychological interventions, and hierarchical educational strategies. Future research endeavors should concentrate on the potential value of digital health technologies in enhancing the decision-making experience and seek to augment the effectiveness of decision-making aids through cultural adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2609-2621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12380087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S539717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore the experiences and pivotal influencing factors of patients with Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) during the surgical decision-making phase to provide a basis for optimizing the shared decision-making between medical professionals and patients and for the implementation of personalized nursing care.

Patients and methods: This phenomenological study employed face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted between January and February 2025. Purposive sampling method was used to select 20 patients with lumbar disc herniation from the orthopedic ward of a tertiary hospital. The interview data were analyzed by Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological analysis method.

Results: The findings of this study revealed that the surgical decision-making experiences of patients with LDH can be delineated into four themes: (1) Motivations underlying the surgical Decision; (2) Decision-making dilemmas arising from insufficient patient information; (3) The multi-dimensional factors influencing decision-making, and (4) Patients express unmet peri-operative needs.

Conclusion: This study reveals that surgical decision-making in patients with lumbar disc herniation is a complex process involving the interaction of biological, psychological, and social factors. It is essential to establish a patient-centered decision-support system, integrating structured information tools, psychological interventions, and hierarchical educational strategies. Future research endeavors should concentrate on the potential value of digital health technologies in enhancing the decision-making experience and seek to augment the effectiveness of decision-making aids through cultural adaptation.

腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策经验:一项定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者在手术决策阶段的经验及关键影响因素,为优化医患共享决策及实施个性化护理提供依据。患者和方法:本现象学研究采用面对面半结构化访谈,于2025年1月至2月进行。采用目的抽样方法对某三级医院骨科病房收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者20例进行回顾性分析。访谈数据采用Colaizzi的七步现象学分析方法进行分析。结果:本研究结果显示,LDH患者的手术决策经历可分为四个主题:(1)手术决策的动机;(2)患者信息不足导致的决策困境;(3)影响决策的多维因素;(4)患者表达未满足的围手术期需求。结论:本研究揭示了腰椎间盘突出症患者的手术决策是一个复杂的过程,涉及生物、心理和社会因素的相互作用。建立以患者为中心的决策支持系统,整合结构化信息工具、心理干预和分层教育策略是至关重要的。未来的研究应集中在数字健康技术在提高决策经验方面的潜在价值,并寻求通过文化适应来增强决策辅助的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信