Testing Education and Accountability as Moderators of the Self-Interest Bias in Moral Character Judgments.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Yong Lu, Katarzyna Miazek, Konrad Bocian
{"title":"Testing Education and Accountability as Moderators of the Self-Interest Bias in Moral Character Judgments.","authors":"Yong Lu, Katarzyna Miazek, Konrad Bocian","doi":"10.1177/01461672251364308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-interest bias describes an inclination of people to evaluate transgressors morally better when the latter's actions serve the former's interests. Effective interventions to mitigate this type of self-serving bias remain underexplored. The current research investigates education and accountability as potential moderators of this bias. In preregistered Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 668), as predicted, educating participants about the self-interest bias eliminated its effect on their moral character judgments. However, across three preregistered accountability studies (<i>N</i> = 2,239), holding participants accountable for their judgments did not attenuate the bias. Similarly, in preregistered Study 5 (<i>N</i> = 641), we found no evidence of a combined effect of education and accountability on reducing the bias. These findings suggest that while increasing awareness through education may effectively reduce biased moral judgments, accountability, especially when lacking external scrutiny or consequences, does not. Theoretical implications, methodological limitations, and future research opportunities are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"1461672251364308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672251364308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The self-interest bias describes an inclination of people to evaluate transgressors morally better when the latter's actions serve the former's interests. Effective interventions to mitigate this type of self-serving bias remain underexplored. The current research investigates education and accountability as potential moderators of this bias. In preregistered Study 1 (N = 668), as predicted, educating participants about the self-interest bias eliminated its effect on their moral character judgments. However, across three preregistered accountability studies (N = 2,239), holding participants accountable for their judgments did not attenuate the bias. Similarly, in preregistered Study 5 (N = 641), we found no evidence of a combined effect of education and accountability on reducing the bias. These findings suggest that while increasing awareness through education may effectively reduce biased moral judgments, accountability, especially when lacking external scrutiny or consequences, does not. Theoretical implications, methodological limitations, and future research opportunities are discussed.

测试教育和问责制对道德品质判断中自利偏见的调节作用。
自利偏见描述了当违法者的行为符合前者的利益时,人们倾向于在道德上更好地评价违法者。减轻这种自私自利偏见的有效干预措施仍未得到充分探索。目前的研究调查了教育和问责制作为这种偏见的潜在调节因素。在预登记的研究1 (N = 668)中,正如预测的那样,对参与者进行自我利益偏见的教育消除了其对道德品质判断的影响。然而,在三个预先登记的问责研究(N = 2239)中,让参与者对他们的判断负责并没有减轻偏见。同样,在预登记的研究5 (N = 641)中,我们没有发现教育和问责制对减少偏倚有联合作用的证据。这些发现表明,虽然通过教育提高意识可以有效地减少有偏见的道德判断,但问责制,特别是在缺乏外部审查或后果的情况下,却不能。讨论了理论意义、方法局限性和未来的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信