Virtual Transition Assessments in Sickle Cell Disease Are Feasible and Available Transition Instruments May Highlight Different Components of the Transition Experience

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Alexandra Boye-Doe, Samuel Wilson, Lindsey Akpuogu, Jane Little, Jacquelyn Baskin-Miller
{"title":"Virtual Transition Assessments in Sickle Cell Disease Are Feasible and Available Transition Instruments May Highlight Different Components of the Transition Experience","authors":"Alexandra Boye-Doe,&nbsp;Samuel Wilson,&nbsp;Lindsey Akpuogu,&nbsp;Jane Little,&nbsp;Jacquelyn Baskin-Miller","doi":"10.1002/pbc.31963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is increased morbidity and mortality during the transition to adult care in sickle cell disease. Standardized implementation of validated transition tools may improve readiness for transition (RFT). We tested the impact of telehealth on this process by comparing in-person or via telehealth administration of the provider-administered tool, TRxANSITION Index (TI), to the patient-reported tool, transition intervention program-RFT (TIP-RFT) in patients 15–21 years old. Scores between testing given in person or via telehealth did not differ (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.9, <i>N</i> = 20). TIP-RFT scores were up to 14% higher than TI. Our results indicate that telehealth transition tools are feasible and are acceptable to providers and participants. Our data also suggest that the more objective TI may be most sensitive in detecting transition needs; this awaits validation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":19822,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","volume":"72 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Blood & Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pbc.31963","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increased morbidity and mortality during the transition to adult care in sickle cell disease. Standardized implementation of validated transition tools may improve readiness for transition (RFT). We tested the impact of telehealth on this process by comparing in-person or via telehealth administration of the provider-administered tool, TRxANSITION Index (TI), to the patient-reported tool, transition intervention program-RFT (TIP-RFT) in patients 15–21 years old. Scores between testing given in person or via telehealth did not differ (p > 0.9, N = 20). TIP-RFT scores were up to 14% higher than TI. Our results indicate that telehealth transition tools are feasible and are acceptable to providers and participants. Our data also suggest that the more objective TI may be most sensitive in detecting transition needs; this awaits validation.

Abstract Image

镰状细胞病的虚拟过渡评估是可行的,可用的过渡工具可以突出过渡经验的不同组成部分。
在镰状细胞病向成人护理过渡期间,发病率和死亡率增加。经过验证的转换工具的标准化实现可以改进转换准备(RFT)。我们测试了远程医疗对这一过程的影响,通过对15-21岁患者进行面对面或通过远程医疗管理提供者管理的工具,过渡指数(TI),和患者报告的工具,过渡干预计划- rft (TIP-RFT)进行比较。亲自或通过远程医疗进行的测试之间的得分没有差异(p > 0.9, N = 20)。TIP-RFT得分比TI高出14%。我们的结果表明,远程医疗过渡工具是可行的,是可接受的提供者和参与者。我们的数据还表明,更客观的TI可能在检测转换需求方面最敏感;这有待验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Pediatric Blood & Cancer 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Blood & Cancer publishes the highest quality manuscripts describing basic and clinical investigations of blood disorders and malignant diseases of childhood including diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, etiology, biology, and molecular and clinical genetics of these diseases as they affect children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatric Blood & Cancer will also include studies on such treatment options as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, immunology, and gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信