Do Super-hydrophilic Surfaces Affect Implant Primary Stability in the Early Healing Phase of Osseointegration? A Systematic Review with Metanalysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Luigi Canullo, Maria Menini, Luca Guardone, Valeria Merlini, Virginia Cameroni, Anton Sculean, Paolo Pesce, Massimo Del Fabbro
{"title":"Do Super-hydrophilic Surfaces Affect Implant Primary Stability in the Early Healing Phase of Osseointegration? A Systematic Review with Metanalysis.","authors":"Luigi Canullo, Maria Menini, Luca Guardone, Valeria Merlini, Virginia Cameroni, Anton Sculean, Paolo Pesce, Massimo Del Fabbro","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implant stability, related to mechanical (primary) and biological (secondary) bone-to-implant interactions, is essential for osseointegration. Implant surface bioactivation is a process designed to accelerate and enhance surface-cell interaction.The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether a beneficial effect of bioactive (BS) over traditional surfaces (TS) can be identified.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic search of Pubmed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify randomized (RCT) and non-randomized controlled trials comparing BS and TS implants. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for RCTs and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for non-RCTs. Outcome variables were implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured through resonance frequency analysis from placement to prosthetic loading, one-year implant survival rate, and marginal bone loss (MBL). Meta-analysis was performed where possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6920 records identified, 13 RCTs and two non-RCTs were included, reporting on 1256 implants (49.8% TS and 50.2% BS) in 596 patients. Four of the studies had a low risk of bias, three had a moderate risk and eight had a high risk. The meta-analysis showed no evidence of an effect of implant surface on survival rate (p = 0.99, 10 studies) and MBL (p = 0.86, 5 studies). At baseline (10 studies) and at one month (9 studies) the ISQ did not differ statistically significantly different between groups. A statistically significantly greater increase in ISQ was found for the BS implants compared to the TS implants (p = 0.04) at three months after placement (9 studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An advantage of BS over TS during the early osseointegration phase could not be demonstrated, but a positive effect on implant stability seems to occur after three months of placement. The statement that bioactive surfaces may safely allow early and immediate implant loading is insufficiently supported by the current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"23 ","pages":"469-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Implant stability, related to mechanical (primary) and biological (secondary) bone-to-implant interactions, is essential for osseointegration. Implant surface bioactivation is a process designed to accelerate and enhance surface-cell interaction.The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether a beneficial effect of bioactive (BS) over traditional surfaces (TS) can be identified.

Materials and methods: An electronic search of Pubmed, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases was performed to identify randomized (RCT) and non-randomized controlled trials comparing BS and TS implants. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for RCTs and the Joanna Briggs Institute tool for non-RCTs. Outcome variables were implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured through resonance frequency analysis from placement to prosthetic loading, one-year implant survival rate, and marginal bone loss (MBL). Meta-analysis was performed where possible.

Results: Of the 6920 records identified, 13 RCTs and two non-RCTs were included, reporting on 1256 implants (49.8% TS and 50.2% BS) in 596 patients. Four of the studies had a low risk of bias, three had a moderate risk and eight had a high risk. The meta-analysis showed no evidence of an effect of implant surface on survival rate (p = 0.99, 10 studies) and MBL (p = 0.86, 5 studies). At baseline (10 studies) and at one month (9 studies) the ISQ did not differ statistically significantly different between groups. A statistically significantly greater increase in ISQ was found for the BS implants compared to the TS implants (p = 0.04) at three months after placement (9 studies).

Conclusion: An advantage of BS over TS during the early osseointegration phase could not be demonstrated, but a positive effect on implant stability seems to occur after three months of placement. The statement that bioactive surfaces may safely allow early and immediate implant loading is insufficiently supported by the current evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超亲水表面会影响骨整合早期愈合阶段种植体的初级稳定性吗?荟萃分析的系统评价。
目的:种植体稳定性与骨与种植体的机械(主要)和生物(次要)相互作用有关,对骨整合至关重要。植入物表面生物活化是一个旨在加速和增强表面细胞相互作用的过程。本系统综述的目的是确定生物活性物质(BS)是否优于传统表面物质(TS)。材料和方法:电子检索Pubmed, Scopus和CENTRAL数据库,以确定比较BS和TS植入物的随机(RCT)和非随机对照试验。使用Cochrane协作工具对随机对照试验进行评估,使用Joanna Briggs研究所工具对非随机对照试验进行评估。结果变量是通过共振频率分析测量种植体稳定商(ISQ),从放置到假体装载,一年种植体存活率和边际骨损失(MBL)。尽可能进行meta分析。结果:在确定的6920条记录中,包括13项随机对照试验和2项非随机对照试验,报告了596例患者的1256例种植体(49.8% TS和50.2% BS)。其中4项研究偏倚风险较低,3项风险中等,8项风险较高。meta分析显示种植体表面对生存率(p = 0.99, 10项研究)和MBL (p = 0.86, 5项研究)没有影响。在基线(10项研究)和1个月(9项研究)时,ISQ在组间没有统计学上的显著差异。在放置后3个月,与TS种植体相比,BS种植体的ISQ增加具有统计学意义(p = 0.04)(9项研究)。结论:在早期骨整合阶段,BS优于TS的优势尚未得到证实,但在植入三个月后,BS对种植体稳定性的积极影响似乎出现了。生物活性表面可以安全地允许早期和立即植入物加载的说法目前的证据不足以支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信