Embedding Implementation Science in Clinical Trials: A Framework for Academic-Life Science Partnerships.

IF 4.5 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tyler L Cope, Emily C O'Brien, Neha J Pagidipati, Monica Leyva, Lauren Cohen, Elizabeth Fraulo, Shelby D Reed, Christopher B Granger, Hayden B Bosworth
{"title":"Embedding Implementation Science in Clinical Trials: A Framework for Academic-Life Science Partnerships.","authors":"Tyler L Cope, Emily C O'Brien, Neha J Pagidipati, Monica Leyva, Lauren Cohen, Elizabeth Fraulo, Shelby D Reed, Christopher B Granger, Hayden B Bosworth","doi":"10.1007/s40290-025-00581-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation science offers a systematic approach to bridging the gap between research and clinical practice by promoting the adoption, scale-up, and sustainment of evidence-based therapies. Historically, academic implementation science efforts in the USA have focused on later-stage post-market research through government-funded initiatives, leaving untapped opportunities to engage more proactively with life science partners, such as pharmaceutical sponsors, earlier in the development process. Limited integration with life science partners, especially during early-phase clinical trials, represents a missed opportunity to address implementation challenges that affect real-world uptake proactively. The objective of this current opinion is to explore how implementation scientists can more effectively position their expertise to support the development, evaluation, and delivery of new therapies throughout the entire clinical trial lifecycle with life science partners. This article proposes a conceptual framework for collaboration between implementation scientists and life science partners, emphasizing how early integration can help identify healthcare system constraints, clinician adoption barriers, and patient acceptability issues, factors that often shape a therapy's downstream impact. Even before efficacy or regulatory certainty is established, implementation science can strengthen trial design, inform site and stakeholder selection, and enhance the interpretability and readiness of findings for real-world uptake. By aligning implementation methodologies with the strategic priorities of pharmaceutical sponsors, academic researchers can provide structured actionable insights that increase the likelihood of clinical and commercial success. Stronger partnerships established earlier in the development process may improve return on investment, reduce time to impact, and accelerate the translation of effective therapies into routine care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19778,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-025-00581-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementation science offers a systematic approach to bridging the gap between research and clinical practice by promoting the adoption, scale-up, and sustainment of evidence-based therapies. Historically, academic implementation science efforts in the USA have focused on later-stage post-market research through government-funded initiatives, leaving untapped opportunities to engage more proactively with life science partners, such as pharmaceutical sponsors, earlier in the development process. Limited integration with life science partners, especially during early-phase clinical trials, represents a missed opportunity to address implementation challenges that affect real-world uptake proactively. The objective of this current opinion is to explore how implementation scientists can more effectively position their expertise to support the development, evaluation, and delivery of new therapies throughout the entire clinical trial lifecycle with life science partners. This article proposes a conceptual framework for collaboration between implementation scientists and life science partners, emphasizing how early integration can help identify healthcare system constraints, clinician adoption barriers, and patient acceptability issues, factors that often shape a therapy's downstream impact. Even before efficacy or regulatory certainty is established, implementation science can strengthen trial design, inform site and stakeholder selection, and enhance the interpretability and readiness of findings for real-world uptake. By aligning implementation methodologies with the strategic priorities of pharmaceutical sponsors, academic researchers can provide structured actionable insights that increase the likelihood of clinical and commercial success. Stronger partnerships established earlier in the development process may improve return on investment, reduce time to impact, and accelerate the translation of effective therapies into routine care.

在临床试验中嵌入实施科学:学术与生命科学伙伴关系的框架。
实施科学通过促进循证疗法的采用、扩大和维持,为弥合研究与临床实践之间的差距提供了一种系统的方法。从历史上看,美国的学术实施科学工作主要集中在通过政府资助的计划进行后期上市后研究,从而在开发过程的早期留下了与生命科学合作伙伴(如制药赞助商)更积极参与的机会。与生命科学合作伙伴的有限整合,特别是在早期临床试验期间,意味着错过了主动解决影响实际应用的实施挑战的机会。本意见的目的是探讨实施科学家如何更有效地定位他们的专业知识,以支持与生命科学合作伙伴在整个临床试验生命周期中开发、评估和交付新疗法。本文为实施科学家和生命科学合作伙伴之间的合作提出了一个概念性框架,强调早期整合如何帮助识别医疗保健系统限制、临床医生采用障碍和患者可接受性问题,这些因素通常会影响治疗的下游影响。即使在有效性或监管确定性建立之前,实施科学也可以加强试验设计,为地点和利益相关者的选择提供信息,并提高研究结果的可解释性和准备性,以供现实世界采用。通过将实施方法与制药赞助商的战略重点结合起来,学术研究人员可以提供结构化的可操作的见解,从而增加临床和商业成功的可能性。在开发过程早期建立更强有力的伙伴关系可以提高投资回报,缩短产生影响的时间,并加速将有效疗法转化为常规护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Pharmaceutical Medicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Medicine is a specialist discipline concerned with medical aspects of the discovery, development, evaluation, registration, regulation, monitoring, marketing, distribution and pricing of medicines, drug-device and drug-diagnostic combinations. The Journal disseminates information to support the community of professionals working in these highly inter-related functions. Key areas include translational medicine, clinical trial design, pharmacovigilance, clinical toxicology, drug regulation, clinical pharmacology, biostatistics and pharmacoeconomics. The Journal includes:Overviews of contentious or emerging issues.Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on topical issues.Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by PRISMA statement.Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to wider areas of clinical research.Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pharmaceutical Medicine may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信