Bilateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation During Sensorimotor Tasks in People with Subacute Stroke - An Exploratory Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Siying Luan, Laura K Fitzgibbin-Colllins, Sarthak Kohli, Nathan Durand, Susan Hunter, Jamie L Fleet, Ricardo Viana, Robert Teasell, Sue Peters
{"title":"Bilateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation During Sensorimotor Tasks in People with Subacute Stroke - An Exploratory Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.","authors":"Siying Luan, Laura K Fitzgibbin-Colllins, Sarthak Kohli, Nathan Durand, Susan Hunter, Jamie L Fleet, Ricardo Viana, Robert Teasell, Sue Peters","doi":"10.1177/10538135251370599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPost-stroke, damage to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) disrupts the neural circuits involved in motor control and sensorimotor integration, which contributes to impaired ankle sensorimotor function.ObjectiveApply functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) post-stroke to investigate, 1) whether PFC activation differed among active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and somatosensory stimulation of the paretic ankle, 2) differences between hemispheres, and 3) interhemispheric asymmetry and functional outcomes.MethodsIn nine participants, bilateral hemodynamic responses of the PFC were collected with fNIRS during active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and somatosensory stimulation. Sensorimotor function and interhemispheric asymmetry were assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMLE) assessment and laterality index.ResultsAcross the three tasks, no differences in PFC activation were found within or between hemispheres. There was a potential relationship between interhemispheric asymmetry with the sensory and motor portions of the FMLE, suggesting that greater asymmetry during passive and somatosensory stimulation tasks may be associated with poorer functional outcomes.ConclusionsOur results highlight that ankle sensorimotor functions may not generate different levels of PFC activation in a single hemisphere. The imbalance of PFC activation between the hemispheres from somatosensory and motor input may relate to clinical somatosensory function, which could be a useful measure of recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538135251370599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251370599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPost-stroke, damage to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) disrupts the neural circuits involved in motor control and sensorimotor integration, which contributes to impaired ankle sensorimotor function.ObjectiveApply functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) post-stroke to investigate, 1) whether PFC activation differed among active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and somatosensory stimulation of the paretic ankle, 2) differences between hemispheres, and 3) interhemispheric asymmetry and functional outcomes.MethodsIn nine participants, bilateral hemodynamic responses of the PFC were collected with fNIRS during active and passive dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and somatosensory stimulation. Sensorimotor function and interhemispheric asymmetry were assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity (FMLE) assessment and laterality index.ResultsAcross the three tasks, no differences in PFC activation were found within or between hemispheres. There was a potential relationship between interhemispheric asymmetry with the sensory and motor portions of the FMLE, suggesting that greater asymmetry during passive and somatosensory stimulation tasks may be associated with poorer functional outcomes.ConclusionsOur results highlight that ankle sensorimotor functions may not generate different levels of PFC activation in a single hemisphere. The imbalance of PFC activation between the hemispheres from somatosensory and motor input may relate to clinical somatosensory function, which could be a useful measure of recovery.

亚急性中风患者感觉运动任务时双侧前额叶皮层的激活——一项探索性功能近红外光谱研究。
中风后,前额叶皮层(PFC)的损伤会破坏参与运动控制和感觉运动整合的神经回路,从而导致踝关节感觉运动功能受损。目的应用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)研究脑卒中后PFC激活在主动和被动背屈/跖屈和体感刺激下是否存在差异;2)半球之间的差异;3)半球间不对称性和功能结局。方法用近红外光谱(fNIRS)采集9例受试者在主动、被动背屈/跖屈和体感刺激时的双侧PFC血流动力学反应。采用Fugl-Meyer下肢(FMLE)评估和偏侧指数评估感觉运动功能和半球间不对称性。结果在三个任务中,在大脑半球内部和半球之间PFC激活没有发现差异。大脑半球间不对称与FMLE的感觉和运动部分之间存在潜在的关系,这表明在被动和体感刺激任务中,更大的不对称可能与较差的功能结果有关。结论踝关节感觉运动功能可能不会在单个半球产生不同水平的PFC激活。来自体感觉和运动输入的PFC激活在两半球之间的不平衡可能与临床体感觉功能有关,这可能是一种有用的恢复措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信