Similar Diameter of Cutaneous Branches of the Proper Digital Nerve and Stump of the Proper Palmar Digital Nerve was a Key Factor for the Sensory Reconstruction in Short Term Outcome of Finger Pulp Defects: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S533750
Tao Xu, Bin Wang, Yiming Lu, Renjing Qi, Yu Sun
{"title":"Similar Diameter of Cutaneous Branches of the Proper Digital Nerve and Stump of the Proper Palmar Digital Nerve was a Key Factor for the Sensory Reconstruction in Short Term Outcome of Finger Pulp Defects: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Tao Xu, Bin Wang, Yiming Lu, Renjing Qi, Yu Sun","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S533750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Whether an innervated reverse digital artery island flap is superior remains controversial. To date, no thorough investigation has been undertaken regarding the exact factors underlying this phenomenon. We aim to systematically summarize the innervated reverse digital artery island flap by leveraging our dataset and extract the key contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 79 patients from June 2016 to September 2019 who underwent innervated reverse digital artery island flap were evaluated retrospectively. Thirty nine underwent sensory nerve reconstruction with similar diameter of cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve and stump of the proper palmar digital nerve (S-innervated group), while 40 with different diameter (D-innervated group). Sensory function was assessed by static two-point discrimination and the modified sensory evaluation standard of British Medical Research Council. Motor function was assessed by the total activity measurement. Pigmentation of the flap was also evaluated by Taylor hyperpigmentation scale. Seventy who underwent non-innervated reverse digital artery island flap at the same period was considered as the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 149 flaps survived completely. There was significant difference in age, operation time, time from injury to surgery, s2PD of the flap within 1 year and pigmentation between S-innervated group and Non-innervated group, while operation time and s2PD of the flap within 1 year between D-innervated group and Non-innervated group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nerve diameter matching was a critical factor in innervated reverse digital artery island flap in the early restoration of sensory function and pigmentation. A significant discrepancy in nerve diameters not only compromised the intended therapeutic outcomes but also increased the incidence of neuroma formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"391-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S533750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Whether an innervated reverse digital artery island flap is superior remains controversial. To date, no thorough investigation has been undertaken regarding the exact factors underlying this phenomenon. We aim to systematically summarize the innervated reverse digital artery island flap by leveraging our dataset and extract the key contributing factors.

Materials and methods: A total of 79 patients from June 2016 to September 2019 who underwent innervated reverse digital artery island flap were evaluated retrospectively. Thirty nine underwent sensory nerve reconstruction with similar diameter of cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve and stump of the proper palmar digital nerve (S-innervated group), while 40 with different diameter (D-innervated group). Sensory function was assessed by static two-point discrimination and the modified sensory evaluation standard of British Medical Research Council. Motor function was assessed by the total activity measurement. Pigmentation of the flap was also evaluated by Taylor hyperpigmentation scale. Seventy who underwent non-innervated reverse digital artery island flap at the same period was considered as the control group.

Results: All 149 flaps survived completely. There was significant difference in age, operation time, time from injury to surgery, s2PD of the flap within 1 year and pigmentation between S-innervated group and Non-innervated group, while operation time and s2PD of the flap within 1 year between D-innervated group and Non-innervated group.

Conclusion: The nerve diameter matching was a critical factor in innervated reverse digital artery island flap in the early restoration of sensory function and pigmentation. A significant discrepancy in nerve diameters not only compromised the intended therapeutic outcomes but also increased the incidence of neuroma formation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

指真神经皮支与指真掌神经残端直径相近是指指髓缺损短期感觉重建的关键因素。
导言:神经支配的指动脉逆行岛状皮瓣是否优越仍有争议。迄今为止,尚未对这一现象背后的确切因素进行彻底调查。我们的目的是利用我们的数据系统地总结神经支配的反向指动脉岛状皮瓣,并提取关键的影响因素。材料与方法:回顾性分析2016年6月至2019年9月行神经支配指动脉逆行岛状皮瓣治疗的79例患者。重建感觉神经39例(s -神经支配组),重建感觉神经39例(s -神经支配组),重建感觉神经40例(d -神经支配组)。感觉功能采用静态两点辨别法和英国医学研究理事会修订的感觉评价标准进行评价。运动功能通过总活动测量来评估。用Taylor色素沉着评分法评价皮瓣的色素沉着。同期行无神经支配指动脉逆行岛状皮瓣70例为对照组。结果:149个皮瓣全部成活。s神经支配组与非神经支配组在年龄、手术时间、损伤至手术时间、皮瓣1年内s2PD、色素沉着等方面差异有统计学意义,而d神经支配组与非神经支配组在皮瓣1年内手术时间、s2PD方面差异有统计学意义。结论:神经直径匹配是神经支配指动脉逆行岛状皮瓣早期恢复感觉功能和色素沉着的关键因素。神经直径的显著差异不仅损害了预期的治疗效果,而且增加了神经瘤形成的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信