Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Surgical Interventions for Infective Endocarditis: A Nationwide Registry.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf473
Ching-Yi Lin, Feng-Cheng Chang, Chun-Yu Chen, Yu-Ting Cheng, Chia-Pin Lin, Ming-Jer Hsieh, Yi-Hsin Chan, Victor Chien-Chia Wu, An-Hsun Chou, Shao-Wei Chen
{"title":"Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Surgical Interventions for Infective Endocarditis: A Nationwide Registry.","authors":"Ching-Yi Lin, Feng-Cheng Chang, Chun-Yu Chen, Yu-Ting Cheng, Chia-Pin Lin, Ming-Jer Hsieh, Yi-Hsin Chan, Victor Chien-Chia Wu, An-Hsun Chou, Shao-Wei Chen","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex differences in infective endocarditis (IE) remain underexplored in large-scale studies. Current findings on clinical outcomes, particularly in surgical IE, are inconsistent, highlighting critical knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2001-2022) and a total of 28 976 adults with IE were identified. Subgroup analysis focused on 4133 patients undergoing valve surgery. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and long-term survival, analyzed using logistic regression and Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 28 976 patients, 4133 underwent surgery (women/men: 10 580/18 396 overall; 1252/2881 surgical). Women were older with more comorbidities. After propensity score matching, women had higher in-hospital mortality in both the general cohort (21.2% vs 19.8%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.17) and surgical subgroup (20.7% vs 13.3%; OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.37-2.11). Women undergoing surgery had more perioperative complications, including postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (10.5% vs 7.8%) and de novo dialysis (13.5% vs 9.8%). Long-term mortality was lower in women, while women in the surgical subgroup had higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25) and redo valve surgery rates (11.5% vs 8.1%; HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.07-1.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women with IE had higher in-hospital mortality regardless of surgical intervention. Among those who underwent surgery, women experienced more perioperative complications compared with men. Although women exhibited superior overall late survival, those undergoing surgery had worse long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for improved sex-specific management, including early diagnosis, timely surgery, and extended follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 8","pages":"ofaf473"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sex differences in infective endocarditis (IE) remain underexplored in large-scale studies. Current findings on clinical outcomes, particularly in surgical IE, are inconsistent, highlighting critical knowledge gaps.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (2001-2022) and a total of 28 976 adults with IE were identified. Subgroup analysis focused on 4133 patients undergoing valve surgery. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and long-term survival, analyzed using logistic regression and Cox models.

Results: Of 28 976 patients, 4133 underwent surgery (women/men: 10 580/18 396 overall; 1252/2881 surgical). Women were older with more comorbidities. After propensity score matching, women had higher in-hospital mortality in both the general cohort (21.2% vs 19.8%; odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.17) and surgical subgroup (20.7% vs 13.3%; OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.37-2.11). Women undergoing surgery had more perioperative complications, including postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (10.5% vs 7.8%) and de novo dialysis (13.5% vs 9.8%). Long-term mortality was lower in women, while women in the surgical subgroup had higher mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25) and redo valve surgery rates (11.5% vs 8.1%; HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.07-1.90).

Conclusions: Women with IE had higher in-hospital mortality regardless of surgical intervention. Among those who underwent surgery, women experienced more perioperative complications compared with men. Although women exhibited superior overall late survival, those undergoing surgery had worse long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need for improved sex-specific management, including early diagnosis, timely surgery, and extended follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

感染性心内膜炎的临床结果和手术干预的性别差异:一项全国性的登记。
背景:感染性心内膜炎(IE)的性别差异在大规模研究中仍未得到充分探讨。目前关于临床结果的研究结果,特别是外科IE,是不一致的,突出了关键的知识空白。​亚组分析集中于4133例接受瓣膜手术的患者。主要结局包括住院死亡率和长期生存率,使用logistic回归和Cox模型进行分析。结果:28976例患者中,4133例接受了手术(女性/男性:总体10 580/18 396;手术1252/2881)。女性年龄越大,合并症越多。在倾向评分匹配后,在普通队列(21.2% vs 19.8%;优势比[OR]: 1.09, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.02-1.17)和手术亚组(20.7% vs 13.3%; OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.37-2.11)中,女性的住院死亡率都较高。接受手术的女性有更多的围手术期并发症,包括心切术后心源性休克(10.5%比7.8%)和重新透析(13.5%比9.8%)。女性的长期死亡率较低,而手术亚组的女性死亡率较高(风险比[HR]: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25)和重做瓣膜手术率(11.5% vs 8.1%;风险比:1.43;95% CI: 1.07-1.90)。结论:与手术干预无关,IE患者的住院死亡率较高。在接受手术的患者中,女性比男性经历了更多的围手术期并发症。尽管女性的总体晚期生存率较高,但接受手术的患者的长期预后较差。这些发现强调了改进性别特异性管理的必要性,包括早期诊断、及时手术和延长随访时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信