Do Autonomic Nervous System and Perceived Exertion Responses Differ Between Walking and Virtual Reality-Engaged Walking?

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_121_25
G Demircioglu, S Ozkan
{"title":"Do Autonomic Nervous System and Perceived Exertion Responses Differ Between Walking and Virtual Reality-Engaged Walking?","authors":"G Demircioglu, S Ozkan","doi":"10.4103/njcp.njcp_121_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Walking, important for cardiovascular health and autonomic regulation, is often done on a treadmill.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study compared the physiological responses of treadmill and virtual reality walking, focusing on their effects on the autonomic nervous system, recovery, and perceived exertion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 40 sedentary participants, assigned to a treadmill group (TG) or a virtual reality group (VRG). Both groups performed 20-minute treadmill walking, with the VRG additionally using the Wii Fit program. Autonomic assessments with the Polar H10 measured heart rate (HR), parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), sympathetic nervous system (SNS), stress index (SI), and the LF/HF ratio. At the same time, perceived exertion was assessed using the OMNI scale. Physiological responses were measured at baseline (T0), post exercise (T1), and at 10 (T2) and 30 minutes (T3) of recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed significant differences in HR (P = 0.040) and LF/HF (P = 0.038) between T0-T1 in the TG. In the VRG, significant changes were found in HR (P = 0.016), SNS (P = 0.010), SI (P = 0.014), and LF/HF (P = 0.020) between T0-T1, with an additional difference in LF/HF at T0-T2 (P = 0.032). OMNI scores significantly differed at all time points (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in autonomic parameters or OMNI scores (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although perceived exertion was similar, the VR group showed greater SNS activation due to immersion, while recovery was identical for both methods. This understanding could contribute to developing rehabilitation strategies considering autonomic VR responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19431,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"28 8","pages":"969-977"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_121_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Walking, important for cardiovascular health and autonomic regulation, is often done on a treadmill.

Aim: This study compared the physiological responses of treadmill and virtual reality walking, focusing on their effects on the autonomic nervous system, recovery, and perceived exertion.

Methods: This study included 40 sedentary participants, assigned to a treadmill group (TG) or a virtual reality group (VRG). Both groups performed 20-minute treadmill walking, with the VRG additionally using the Wii Fit program. Autonomic assessments with the Polar H10 measured heart rate (HR), parasympathetic nervous system (PNS), sympathetic nervous system (SNS), stress index (SI), and the LF/HF ratio. At the same time, perceived exertion was assessed using the OMNI scale. Physiological responses were measured at baseline (T0), post exercise (T1), and at 10 (T2) and 30 minutes (T3) of recovery.

Results: The study showed significant differences in HR (P = 0.040) and LF/HF (P = 0.038) between T0-T1 in the TG. In the VRG, significant changes were found in HR (P = 0.016), SNS (P = 0.010), SI (P = 0.014), and LF/HF (P = 0.020) between T0-T1, with an additional difference in LF/HF at T0-T2 (P = 0.032). OMNI scores significantly differed at all time points (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups in autonomic parameters or OMNI scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Although perceived exertion was similar, the VR group showed greater SNS activation due to immersion, while recovery was identical for both methods. This understanding could contribute to developing rehabilitation strategies considering autonomic VR responses.

自主神经系统和感知运动反应在步行和虚拟现实参与的步行之间有区别吗?
背景:步行对心血管健康和自主调节很重要,通常在跑步机上进行。目的:本研究比较了跑步机和虚拟现实步行的生理反应,重点研究了它们对自主神经系统、恢复和感知劳累的影响。方法:这项研究包括40名久坐不动的参与者,被分配到跑步机组(TG)和虚拟现实组(VRG)。两组都进行了20分钟的跑步机行走,VRG另外使用Wii Fit程序。自主神经评估采用Polar H10测量心率(HR)、副交感神经系统(PNS)、交感神经系统(SNS)、应激指数(SI)和LF/HF比值。同时,使用OMNI量表评估感知运动强度。在基线(T0)、运动后(T1)、恢复后10分钟(T2)和30分钟(T3)测量生理反应。结果:研究显示TG在T0-T1之间HR (P = 0.040)和LF/HF (P = 0.038)有显著差异。在VRG中,T0-T1之间HR (P = 0.016)、SNS (P = 0.010)、SI (P = 0.014)和LF/HF (P = 0.020)有显著变化,T0-T2之间LF/HF有显著差异(P = 0.032)。各时间点OMNI评分差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。各组间自主神经参数及OMNI评分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:虽然感知劳累相似,但VR组由于浸泡表现出更大的SNS激活,而两种方法的恢复相同。这种理解有助于制定考虑自主VR反应的康复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice is a Monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by the Medical and Dental Consultants’ Association of Nigeria. The journal’s full text is available online at www.njcponline.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal makes a token charge for submission, processing and publication of manuscripts including color reproduction of photographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信