Endovascular Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations After New Liquid Embolic Agents: A Single-Center 7-Year Experience With Safety Outcomes.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Embolization is part of multidisciplinary brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treatment, yet safety data for novel liquid embolization agents (LEAs) such as Squid and PHIL remain limited. This study reports complications and outcomes from curative embolization using Onyx, Squid, PHIL, and Glue.

Methods: Adult patients with brain AVMs treated with LEAs from July 2015 to December 2022 were reviewed for intraprocedural technical issues, postoperative hemorrhagic, and ischemic complications. Minor (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) and major complication rate (morbidity/modified Rankin Scale >2), mortality, and 6-month angiographic cure rate were evaluated.

Results: In total, 135 patients (62.2% male, mean age 41.7 ± 15.1 years) with 206 embolizations (34% Onyx, 18.9% Squid, 17.5% PHIL, 28.2% Glue) were included. Overall, 87.4% procedures were in ruptured AVMs and 84% treated by the transarterial technique (84%). The 6-month angiographic cure rate was 53.3%, higher when nonadhesive LEAs were used than Glue (65.3% vs 17.6%, P < .001). In adjusted analysis, only eloquent location (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4; P = .007) and Glue (OR = 9.1; 95% CI 2.9-28.9, P < .001) were predictors of lower angiographic occlusion rate, whereas size had an inverse correlation (OR = 0.67; P = .019). Technical procedural complications, hemorrhagic, and ischemic rates were 10.2% (2.2% morbidity), 13.1% (3.7% morbidity and 2.2% mortality), and 9.2% (2.2% morbidity, 0% mortality), respectively, regardless of the preferred LEA. Minor, major complications, and mortality rates were 3.7%, 4.4%, and 2.2%, respectively. Hemorrhage was the major contributor to morbidity and mortality, whereas deep venous drainage was an independent predictor of hemorrhage and mortality.

Conclusion: PHIL and Squid demonstrated complication and angiographic cure rates comparable with Onyx. However, curative embolization of brain AVMs resulted in only moderate angiographic occlusion. Larger multicenter studies with standardized operator protocols, cost-effectiveness assessments, and extended follow-up are warranted to validate these findings.