Endovascular Retreatment of Previously Clipped Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Keng Siang Lee, Julian Han, Sherif R W Kirollos, Ramez Kirollos, Michael T Lawton, Adam S Arthur, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"Endovascular Retreatment of Previously Clipped Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.","authors":"Keng Siang Lee, Julian Han, Sherif R W Kirollos, Ramez Kirollos, Michael T Lawton, Adam S Arthur, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular retreatment of previously clipped intracranial aneurysms (IAs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were performed. The primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at the last follow-up. Secondary outcomes included complete occlusion, and perioperative complications. One-stage individual patient data meta-analysis was performed, adjusted using generalized linear mixed models with prespecified covariables and study as a random effect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies reporting 413 patients with 414 previously clipped IAs retreated endovascularly were included. Totally, 249 (60.1%), 39 (9.4%), 39 (9.4%), 81 (19.6%) and 6 (1.4%), underwent simple coiling, balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, flow diversion, and disruption, respectively. Of these, 88.6% and 11.4% IAs were located anteriorly and posteriorly. Mean size of the IAs at retreatment was 6.8 mm. Most (70.4%) of previously clipped IAs were unruptured at retreatment, mainly due to regrowth (n = 48), remnants (n = 49) or recurrences (n = 41), when reported. With clinical follow-up of 26.8 months, proportions of good functional outcomes, improved/unchanged neurological outcomes, and deaths were 77.3% (95%CI: 72.15; 81.74), 88.2% (95%CI: 64.57; 96.85), and 6.9% (95%CI: 4.19; 11.18), respectively. With angiographical follow-up of 19.4 months, the proportion of complete occlusion was 74.4% (95%CI: 64.38; 82.29). Multivariate analyses showed that a prolonged interval (>1 month) between clipping and endovascular retreatment was associated with good functional outcome (odds ratio 7.37, 95%CI: 2.16; 29.94) whereas posteriorly located IAs were associated with perioperative complications (odds ratio 8.05, 95%CI: 1.45; 50.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular retreatment of previously clipped IAs can be accomplished safely and effectively in well-selected patients. The indications for retreatment need to be carefully weighed against the natural history of a previously clipped IA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular retreatment of previously clipped intracranial aneurysms (IAs).

Methods: Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were performed. The primary outcome was good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at the last follow-up. Secondary outcomes included complete occlusion, and perioperative complications. One-stage individual patient data meta-analysis was performed, adjusted using generalized linear mixed models with prespecified covariables and study as a random effect.

Results: Twenty-six studies reporting 413 patients with 414 previously clipped IAs retreated endovascularly were included. Totally, 249 (60.1%), 39 (9.4%), 39 (9.4%), 81 (19.6%) and 6 (1.4%), underwent simple coiling, balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, flow diversion, and disruption, respectively. Of these, 88.6% and 11.4% IAs were located anteriorly and posteriorly. Mean size of the IAs at retreatment was 6.8 mm. Most (70.4%) of previously clipped IAs were unruptured at retreatment, mainly due to regrowth (n = 48), remnants (n = 49) or recurrences (n = 41), when reported. With clinical follow-up of 26.8 months, proportions of good functional outcomes, improved/unchanged neurological outcomes, and deaths were 77.3% (95%CI: 72.15; 81.74), 88.2% (95%CI: 64.57; 96.85), and 6.9% (95%CI: 4.19; 11.18), respectively. With angiographical follow-up of 19.4 months, the proportion of complete occlusion was 74.4% (95%CI: 64.38; 82.29). Multivariate analyses showed that a prolonged interval (>1 month) between clipping and endovascular retreatment was associated with good functional outcome (odds ratio 7.37, 95%CI: 2.16; 29.94) whereas posteriorly located IAs were associated with perioperative complications (odds ratio 8.05, 95%CI: 1.45; 50.48).

Conclusion: Endovascular retreatment of previously clipped IAs can be accomplished safely and effectively in well-selected patients. The indications for retreatment need to be carefully weighed against the natural history of a previously clipped IA.

先前夹闭颅内动脉瘤的血管内再治疗:个体患者数据荟萃分析。
背景与目的:评价血管内再治疗先前夹闭的颅内动脉瘤的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索Medline、Embase和Cochrane Central。最后一次随访时,主要结局为良好的功能结局(改良Rankin量表0-2)。次要结果包括完全闭塞和围手术期并发症。进行单阶段个体患者数据荟萃分析,使用具有预先指定协变量的广义线性混合模型进行调整,并作为随机效应进行研究。结果:纳入了26项研究,报告了413例先前夹持的IAs患者(414例)血管内复位。总共249例(60.1%)、39例(9.4%)、39例(9.4%)、81例(19.6%)和6例(1.4%)分别接受了简单卷取、球囊辅助卷取、支架辅助卷取、分流和中断。其中,88.6%和11.4%的IAs位于前部和后部。再处理时IAs的平均尺寸为6.8 mm。大多数(70.4%)先前切除的IAs在再治疗时未破裂,主要是由于再生(n = 48),残留(n = 49)或复发(n = 41)。在26.8个月的临床随访中,功能预后良好、神经预后改善/不变和死亡的比例分别为77.3% (95%CI: 72.15; 81.74)、88.2% (95%CI: 64.57; 96.85)和6.9% (95%CI: 4.19; 11.18)。血管造影随访19.4个月,完全闭塞比例为74.4% (95%CI: 64.38; 82.29)。多因素分析显示,夹持和血管内再治疗的时间间隔较长(1个月)与良好的功能预后相关(优势比7.37,95%CI: 2.16; 29.94),而后置IAs与围手术期并发症相关(优势比8.05,95%CI: 1.45; 50.48)。结论:选择合适的患者,可以安全有效地完成先前夹闭的血管内再治疗。再治疗的适应症需要仔细权衡先前夹持的内源性肿瘤的自然病史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信