Self-weighing and disordered eating among women: Exploring the moderating role of psychological resilience and self-compassion.

IF 1.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Tuğba Türkcan, Duygu Karakuş, Yağmur Temiz, Ebru Çolak, Pınar Bıçaksız, Burcu Tekeş
{"title":"Self-weighing and disordered eating among women: Exploring the moderating role of psychological resilience and self-compassion.","authors":"Tuğba Türkcan, Duygu Karakuş, Yağmur Temiz, Ebru Çolak, Pınar Bıçaksız, Burcu Tekeş","doi":"10.1177/02601060251367222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Self-weighing is a common practice among women, often associated with both adaptive and maladaptive eating behaviours, yet its psychological implications remain unclear. <b>Aim:</b> This study aims to examine the potential moderating roles of psychological resilience and self-compassion in the relationship between self-weighing frequency and disordered eating behaviours among women. <b>Method:</b> The study sample consisted of 372 women with a mean age of 29.27 (<i>SD</i> = 7.24). The data were collected in Türkiye using convenience sampling methods. Cross-sectional data were collected using a self-report questionnaire, which included the Self-Compassion Scale, the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, and the Connor-Davidson Psychological Resilience Scale, along with a single item to measure self-weighing frequency. <b>Results:</b> Four distinct moderating effects between self-weighing frequency and cognitive restriction were found to be significant. The association of self-weighing frequency with cognitive restriction was significantly positive for those reporting low levels of tenacity and personal competence, psychological resilience, and self-compassion. At the same time, it was nonsignificant for those with high levels of tenacity and personal competence, psychological resilience, and self-compassion. The relationship between self-weighing frequency and cognitive restriction was significantly positive at both low and high levels of self-compassion, but this association was stronger for those with low self-compassion than for those with high self-compassion. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings highlight the significance of considering psychological factors such as psychological resilience and self-compassion in understanding the relationship between self-weighing frequency and disordered eating behaviours. They suggest that these variables can modify the strength and direction of this relationship, emphasising the importance of addressing psychological resilience and self-compassion in interventions targeting disordered eating behaviours related to self-weighing frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060251367222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251367222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-weighing is a common practice among women, often associated with both adaptive and maladaptive eating behaviours, yet its psychological implications remain unclear. Aim: This study aims to examine the potential moderating roles of psychological resilience and self-compassion in the relationship between self-weighing frequency and disordered eating behaviours among women. Method: The study sample consisted of 372 women with a mean age of 29.27 (SD = 7.24). The data were collected in Türkiye using convenience sampling methods. Cross-sectional data were collected using a self-report questionnaire, which included the Self-Compassion Scale, the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, and the Connor-Davidson Psychological Resilience Scale, along with a single item to measure self-weighing frequency. Results: Four distinct moderating effects between self-weighing frequency and cognitive restriction were found to be significant. The association of self-weighing frequency with cognitive restriction was significantly positive for those reporting low levels of tenacity and personal competence, psychological resilience, and self-compassion. At the same time, it was nonsignificant for those with high levels of tenacity and personal competence, psychological resilience, and self-compassion. The relationship between self-weighing frequency and cognitive restriction was significantly positive at both low and high levels of self-compassion, but this association was stronger for those with low self-compassion than for those with high self-compassion. Conclusion: These findings highlight the significance of considering psychological factors such as psychological resilience and self-compassion in understanding the relationship between self-weighing frequency and disordered eating behaviours. They suggest that these variables can modify the strength and direction of this relationship, emphasising the importance of addressing psychological resilience and self-compassion in interventions targeting disordered eating behaviours related to self-weighing frequency.

女性体重与饮食失调:心理弹性和自我同情的调节作用。
背景:自我称重在女性中很常见,通常与适应性和不适应性饮食行为有关,但其心理含义尚不清楚。目的:本研究旨在探讨心理弹性和自我同情在女性自我称体重频率与饮食失调行为之间的潜在调节作用。方法:研究样本为372名女性,平均年龄29.27岁(SD = 7.24)。数据采集采用简便抽样法。横断面数据是通过自我报告问卷收集的,包括自我同情量表、三因素饮食问卷和康纳-戴维森心理弹性量表,以及测量自我称重频率的单一项目。结果:自重频率与认知限制之间存在显著的调节效应。在韧性、个人能力、心理弹性和自我同情水平较低的学生中,自我称重频率与认知限制的关系显著正相关。与此同时,对于那些韧性、个人能力、心理弹性和自我同情水平较高的人来说,这一结果不显著。自我称量频率与认知限制在高、低水平的自我同情中均呈显著正相关,但低水平的自我同情比高水平的自我同情更强。结论:研究结果表明,考虑心理弹性和自我同情等心理因素对理解自我称体重频率与饮食失调行为的关系具有重要意义。他们认为,这些变量可以改变这种关系的强度和方向,强调在针对与自我称重频率相关的饮食失调行为的干预中,解决心理弹性和自我同情的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信