Clues from dyadic interactions in early childhood predict psychotic-like experiences at the transition to adolescence in a sample enriched for psychopathology risk.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Vanessa C Zarubin,Claudia M Haase,Elizabeth S Norton,Margaret J Briggs-Gowan,Norrina B Allen,Lauren S Wakschlag,Vijay A Mittal
{"title":"Clues from dyadic interactions in early childhood predict psychotic-like experiences at the transition to adolescence in a sample enriched for psychopathology risk.","authors":"Vanessa C Zarubin,Claudia M Haase,Elizabeth S Norton,Margaret J Briggs-Gowan,Norrina B Allen,Lauren S Wakschlag,Vijay A Mittal","doi":"10.1037/abn0001053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early childhood is a critical period for socioemotional development with long-term implications for the emergence of psychopathology. However, alterations in social interactions during early childhood have not been examined as vulnerability markers for psychosis. Raters naïve to clinical outcomes coded behaviors during socially engaged and socially disengaged contexts of the disruptive behavior diagnostic observation schedule video-recorded in early childhood (ages 3-5 years old; M = 4.23) for a subset of child-caregiver dyads from the multidimensional assessment of preschoolers study (n = 93), a sample enriched for psychopathology risk by oversampling for irritability and exposure to violence. Linear regression models examined the predictive value of mutual responsive behavior (e.g., appropriate responses to the dyadic partner's bids for engagement), positive emotion, negative emotion, and eye gaze for psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) at the \"tween\" wave (ages 10-13). Parallel models with internalizing/externalizing symptoms measured at preadolescence (n = 87; ages 8-11) examined specificity. Lower responsive behavior, greater negative emotion, and lower eye gaze among child-caregiver dyads in only the socially engaged task predicted greater PLEs, all p < .042 and multiple R² > .045. A combined model performed better than the individual models, p = .010, multiple R² = .139, indicating these predictors contributed unique variance. For internalizing and externalizing symptoms, only eye gaze in the socially disengaged task was a significant predictor for externalizing symptoms. The specificity of results suggests the observed dyadic behaviors may index mechanisms of neurodevelopmental vulnerability to psychosis, which has significant implications for early detection and prevention. Studies with dense observations beginning in infancy, paired to neurophysiology, and linked to PLEs will be key to understanding neurodevelopmental mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early childhood is a critical period for socioemotional development with long-term implications for the emergence of psychopathology. However, alterations in social interactions during early childhood have not been examined as vulnerability markers for psychosis. Raters naïve to clinical outcomes coded behaviors during socially engaged and socially disengaged contexts of the disruptive behavior diagnostic observation schedule video-recorded in early childhood (ages 3-5 years old; M = 4.23) for a subset of child-caregiver dyads from the multidimensional assessment of preschoolers study (n = 93), a sample enriched for psychopathology risk by oversampling for irritability and exposure to violence. Linear regression models examined the predictive value of mutual responsive behavior (e.g., appropriate responses to the dyadic partner's bids for engagement), positive emotion, negative emotion, and eye gaze for psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) at the "tween" wave (ages 10-13). Parallel models with internalizing/externalizing symptoms measured at preadolescence (n = 87; ages 8-11) examined specificity. Lower responsive behavior, greater negative emotion, and lower eye gaze among child-caregiver dyads in only the socially engaged task predicted greater PLEs, all p < .042 and multiple R² > .045. A combined model performed better than the individual models, p = .010, multiple R² = .139, indicating these predictors contributed unique variance. For internalizing and externalizing symptoms, only eye gaze in the socially disengaged task was a significant predictor for externalizing symptoms. The specificity of results suggests the observed dyadic behaviors may index mechanisms of neurodevelopmental vulnerability to psychosis, which has significant implications for early detection and prevention. Studies with dense observations beginning in infancy, paired to neurophysiology, and linked to PLEs will be key to understanding neurodevelopmental mechanisms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
在一个丰富了精神病理风险的样本中,儿童早期二元互动的线索预测了过渡到青春期的精神病样经历。
幼儿期是社会情感发展的关键时期,对精神病理的出现有着长期的影响。然而,儿童早期社会互动的改变并没有作为精神病的脆弱性标志进行研究。评分者naïve对临床结果进行编码,在社会参与和社会脱离的破坏性行为诊断观察计划的背景下,对幼儿(3-5岁;M = 4.23)的一组儿童照顾者的行为进行视频记录(n = 93),这些样本来自学龄前儿童多维评估研究(n = 93),通过对易怒和暴力暴露进行过采样,丰富了精神病理风险。线性回归模型检验了相互反应行为(例如,对二元伴侣的参与出价的适当反应),积极情绪,消极情绪和眼睛注视在“十岁”波(10-13岁)时对精神病样经历(PLEs)的预测价值。在青春期前测量具有内化/外化症状的平行模型(n = 87; 8-11岁)检验特异性。只有在社会参与任务中,照顾儿童的二人组较低的反应行为、较强的消极情绪和较低的目光注视预示着较高的幸福指数,所有p < 0.042,多重R²> .045。组合模型优于单个模型,p = 0.010,多重R²= 0.139,表明这些预测因子贡献了独特的方差。对于内在化和外在化症状,只有社会脱离任务中的眼睛注视是外在化症状的显著预测因子。结果的特异性表明,观察到的二元行为可能指示神经发育易感性对精神病的机制,这对早期发现和预防具有重要意义。从婴儿期开始的密集观察研究,与神经生理学相结合,并与ple相关联,将是理解神经发育机制的关键。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信