Outcome Analysis and Early Concept Development to Identify the Most Suitable Woven EndoBridge Size Based on Various Shapes of Cerebral Aneurysms.

IF 1.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dae Chul Suh, Kang Jun Yoon
{"title":"Outcome Analysis and Early Concept Development to Identify the Most Suitable Woven EndoBridge Size Based on Various Shapes of Cerebral Aneurysms.","authors":"Dae Chul Suh, Kang Jun Yoon","doi":"10.5469/neuroint.2025.00556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The selection of the appropriate Woven EndoBridge (WEB) size is the most critical aspect of the decision-making process in aneurysm WEB embolization. However, there are currently no precise criteria for measuring WEB size that correspond to each aneurysm. This study presents a process that includes a WEB index for determining the exact volume based on various aneurysm shape types.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty consecutive aneurysms treated with WEB device were included. The volume measurements of the aneurysms, based on their column configurations, were compared with WEB volume to assess the accuracy of the fit within each aneurysm. After categorizing the aneurysms into symmetric and asymmetric shapes, they were further classified into 5 types according to their configurations. We estimated outcomes, including any events or recurrences, and calculated WEB index (WEB volume/aneurysm volume) along with the median and interquartile range to evaluate differences based on shape type. A statistical analysis was conducted to identify associations between various variables and stenting and/or recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symmetric aneurysms (n=39, 65%) were more prevalent than asymmetric aneurysms (n=21, 35%). Among the 5 shape types, the column shape was the most common (n=32, 53%), followed by submarine (n=9, 15%), sphere (n=7, 12%), boots (n=6, 10%), and mitten (n=6, 10%) shapes. The median WEB index was 0.96. Asymmetric aneurysm shapes were associated with stent-assisted procedures (oversizing) (P=0.029) and the presence of sac remnants or recurrence (undersizing) (P=0.033). There were no adverse events reported, except for 1 non-procedure-related death at 7 months and 2 retreatments among 3 recurred aneurysms during a mean magnetic resonance angiography follow-up of 8 months (range, 3-21 months) and a mean clinical follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-30 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcome of WEB embolization depended on aneurysm configuration (shape types) and the measurement of aneurysm volume (WEB index).</p>","PeriodicalId":19140,"journal":{"name":"Neurointervention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2025.00556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The selection of the appropriate Woven EndoBridge (WEB) size is the most critical aspect of the decision-making process in aneurysm WEB embolization. However, there are currently no precise criteria for measuring WEB size that correspond to each aneurysm. This study presents a process that includes a WEB index for determining the exact volume based on various aneurysm shape types.

Materials and methods: Sixty consecutive aneurysms treated with WEB device were included. The volume measurements of the aneurysms, based on their column configurations, were compared with WEB volume to assess the accuracy of the fit within each aneurysm. After categorizing the aneurysms into symmetric and asymmetric shapes, they were further classified into 5 types according to their configurations. We estimated outcomes, including any events or recurrences, and calculated WEB index (WEB volume/aneurysm volume) along with the median and interquartile range to evaluate differences based on shape type. A statistical analysis was conducted to identify associations between various variables and stenting and/or recurrence.

Results: Symmetric aneurysms (n=39, 65%) were more prevalent than asymmetric aneurysms (n=21, 35%). Among the 5 shape types, the column shape was the most common (n=32, 53%), followed by submarine (n=9, 15%), sphere (n=7, 12%), boots (n=6, 10%), and mitten (n=6, 10%) shapes. The median WEB index was 0.96. Asymmetric aneurysm shapes were associated with stent-assisted procedures (oversizing) (P=0.029) and the presence of sac remnants or recurrence (undersizing) (P=0.033). There were no adverse events reported, except for 1 non-procedure-related death at 7 months and 2 retreatments among 3 recurred aneurysms during a mean magnetic resonance angiography follow-up of 8 months (range, 3-21 months) and a mean clinical follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-30 months).

Conclusion: Outcome of WEB embolization depended on aneurysm configuration (shape types) and the measurement of aneurysm volume (WEB index).

基于不同脑动脉瘤形状确定最合适编织内桥尺寸的结果分析和早期概念发展。
目的:选择合适的编织桥(WEB)尺寸是动脉瘤栓塞决策过程中最关键的方面。然而,目前还没有精确的标准来测量每个动脉瘤对应的血管大小。这项研究提出了一个过程,其中包括一个WEB指数,用于根据各种动脉瘤形状类型确定确切的体积。材料和方法:采用WEB装置连续治疗60例动脉瘤。根据动脉瘤柱的结构,将动脉瘤的体积测量值与血管体积进行比较,以评估每个动脉瘤内吻合的准确性。在将动脉瘤分为对称型和非对称型后,根据其形态进一步分为5种类型。我们估计了结果,包括任何事件或复发,并计算了WEB指数(WEB体积/动脉瘤体积)以及中位数和四分位数范围,以评估基于形状类型的差异。进行了统计分析,以确定各种变量与支架植入和/或复发之间的关联。结果:对称动脉瘤(n=39, 65%)高于非对称动脉瘤(n=21, 35%)。在5种形状类型中,柱形最常见(n=32, 53%),其次是潜艇形(n=9, 15%),球形(n=7, 12%),靴子形(n=6, 10%)和连指手套形(n=6, 10%)。WEB指数中位数为0.96。不对称动脉瘤形状与支架辅助手术(过大)(P=0.029)和囊残余或复发(过小)(P=0.033)相关。在平均磁共振血管造影随访8个月(范围3-21个月)和平均临床随访12个月(范围3-30个月)期间,除7个月时1例非手术相关死亡和3例复发动脉瘤中2例再治疗外,无不良事件报告。结论:WEB栓塞的效果取决于动脉瘤的形态(形态类型)和动脉瘤体积(WEB指数)的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信