Modified colloid cyst risk score: a new tool for clinical decision-making in patients with colloid cysts.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ehsan Alimohammadi, Guive Sharifi, Majidreza Farroki, Seyed Reza Bagheri, Mohammad Samadian, Kaveh Ebrahimzadeh, Ehsan Soltanian, Abbas Amirjamshidi
{"title":"Modified colloid cyst risk score: a new tool for clinical decision-making in patients with colloid cysts.","authors":"Ehsan Alimohammadi, Guive Sharifi, Majidreza Farroki, Seyed Reza Bagheri, Mohammad Samadian, Kaveh Ebrahimzadeh, Ehsan Soltanian, Abbas Amirjamshidi","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2549026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study develops the Modified Colloid Cyst Risk Score (MCCRS), a novel, evidence-based tool designed to identify patients with colloid cysts at high risk for clinical deterioration and obstructive hydrocephalus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to identify clinical indicators associated with worsening outcomes in colloid cyst patients. The MCCRS was constructed through expert consensus utilizing the modified Delphi technique. Its validity and reliability were subsequently evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 34 studies that met inclusion criteria. The MCCRS comprises several key criteria, each assigned specific points to stratify patients into different risk categories. These factors include cyst size (0-2 points), location within a risk zone (0-2 points), symptom presence (0-2 points), growth rate (0-2 points), patient age (0-1 point), and FLAIR MRI hyperintensity (additional point). Total scores categorize patients: 0-2 indicates low risk, suggesting annual MRI follow-up; 3-5 indicates moderate risk, requiring more frequent monitoring; scores of 6 or higher denote high risk, warranting aggressive management or surgical intervention. The MCCRS demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 99% for predicting clinical deterioration or obstructive hydrocephalus. Its positive predictive value was 98%, and negative predictive value was 94%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MCCRS is a valid, reliable tool that integrates multiple risk factors to guide clinical decision-making in colloid cyst management. It facilitates personalized monitoring strategies and intervention planning to prevent adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2549026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study develops the Modified Colloid Cyst Risk Score (MCCRS), a novel, evidence-based tool designed to identify patients with colloid cysts at high risk for clinical deterioration and obstructive hydrocephalus.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify clinical indicators associated with worsening outcomes in colloid cyst patients. The MCCRS was constructed through expert consensus utilizing the modified Delphi technique. Its validity and reliability were subsequently evaluated.

Results: The review included 34 studies that met inclusion criteria. The MCCRS comprises several key criteria, each assigned specific points to stratify patients into different risk categories. These factors include cyst size (0-2 points), location within a risk zone (0-2 points), symptom presence (0-2 points), growth rate (0-2 points), patient age (0-1 point), and FLAIR MRI hyperintensity (additional point). Total scores categorize patients: 0-2 indicates low risk, suggesting annual MRI follow-up; 3-5 indicates moderate risk, requiring more frequent monitoring; scores of 6 or higher denote high risk, warranting aggressive management or surgical intervention. The MCCRS demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 99% for predicting clinical deterioration or obstructive hydrocephalus. Its positive predictive value was 98%, and negative predictive value was 94%.

Conclusion: The MCCRS is a valid, reliable tool that integrates multiple risk factors to guide clinical decision-making in colloid cyst management. It facilitates personalized monitoring strategies and intervention planning to prevent adverse outcomes.

改良胶体囊肿风险评分:胶体囊肿患者临床决策的新工具。
背景:本研究开发了改良胶体囊肿风险评分(MCCRS),这是一种新颖的基于证据的工具,旨在识别具有临床恶化和阻塞性脑积水高风险的胶体囊肿患者。方法:系统评价与胶体囊肿患者预后恶化相关的临床指标。采用改进的德尔菲法,通过专家共识构建MCCRS。随后对其效度和信度进行了评价。结果:本综述纳入34项符合纳入标准的研究。MCCRS包括几个关键标准,每个标准都有特定的点来将患者划分为不同的风险类别。这些因素包括囊肿大小(0-2分)、在危险区域内的位置(0-2分)、症状是否存在(0-2分)、生长速度(0-2分)、患者年龄(0-1分)和FLAIR MRI高强度(加分)。总分对患者进行分类:0-2分为低危,建议每年MRI随访;3-5为中度风险,需要更频繁地监测;6分或更高表示高风险,需要积极治疗或手术干预。MCCRS预测临床恶化或梗阻性脑积水的敏感性为93%,特异性为99%。阳性预测值为98%,阴性预测值为94%。结论:MCCRS是一种有效、可靠的综合多种危险因素的工具,可指导胶体囊肿治疗的临床决策。它促进了个性化的监测策略和干预计划,以防止不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信