The Acceptance, Commitment and COgnitive RemeDiation (ACCORD) Study: Can a Brief Online Cognitive Intervention Improve Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Disease?

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Madison Simons, Sara H Marchese, Alyse Bedell, Livia Guadagnoli, Sonia Zavala, Dustin A Carlson, Josie McGarva, John Pandolfino, Tiffany Taft
{"title":"The Acceptance, Commitment and COgnitive RemeDiation (ACCORD) Study: Can a Brief Online Cognitive Intervention Improve Outcomes in Patients With Esophageal Disease?","authors":"Madison Simons, Sara H Marchese, Alyse Bedell, Livia Guadagnoli, Sonia Zavala, Dustin A Carlson, Josie McGarva, John Pandolfino, Tiffany Taft","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive and psychological inflexibility are two mental processes that influence how a person interprets and responds to esophageal symptoms. Patients with greater mental inflexibility are at risk for poorer outcomes. Brain-gut behavioral therapies (BGBT) are effective adjunctive treatments in many digestive diseases, with potential to improve mental flexibility. We piloted a brief intervention targeting cognitive and psychological inflexibility in patients with esophageal disease. Secondary aims included improving symptoms, mood, and quality of life (QoL) and reducing hypervigilance and symptom anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty adults newly diagnosed with achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux, or functional dysphagia from an esophageal clinic participated in a non-randomized, open-label trial. Acceptance, Commitment and COgnitive RemeDiation (ACCORD) was a novel 4-week BGBT administered via telemedicine. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed. Evaluations of esophageal symptom severity, cognitive and psychological flexibility, hypervigilance, symptom anxiety, and QoL occurred at baseline and posttreatment. Last observation carried forward was used for patients with incomplete 6-month data. Bayes Factor evaluated strength of support for study hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>89.9% of participants completed ACCORD. Moderate to decisive gains occurred for some markers of cognitive flexibility and psychological flexibility, which may demonstrate a delayed but strong improvement. Participants demonstrated strong to decisive reductions in symptoms, symptom anxiety, and decisive increases in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and inferences: </strong>A novel, four-session BGBT targeting cognitive and psychological flexibility in patients with esophageal disease was feasible, acceptable, and shows potential to improve symptom severity, symptom anxiety, and HRQoL. ACCORD's use of telemedicine may mitigate access issues related to BGBTs. Further study is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive and psychological inflexibility are two mental processes that influence how a person interprets and responds to esophageal symptoms. Patients with greater mental inflexibility are at risk for poorer outcomes. Brain-gut behavioral therapies (BGBT) are effective adjunctive treatments in many digestive diseases, with potential to improve mental flexibility. We piloted a brief intervention targeting cognitive and psychological inflexibility in patients with esophageal disease. Secondary aims included improving symptoms, mood, and quality of life (QoL) and reducing hypervigilance and symptom anxiety.

Methods: Eighty adults newly diagnosed with achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux, or functional dysphagia from an esophageal clinic participated in a non-randomized, open-label trial. Acceptance, Commitment and COgnitive RemeDiation (ACCORD) was a novel 4-week BGBT administered via telemedicine. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed. Evaluations of esophageal symptom severity, cognitive and psychological flexibility, hypervigilance, symptom anxiety, and QoL occurred at baseline and posttreatment. Last observation carried forward was used for patients with incomplete 6-month data. Bayes Factor evaluated strength of support for study hypotheses.

Key results: 89.9% of participants completed ACCORD. Moderate to decisive gains occurred for some markers of cognitive flexibility and psychological flexibility, which may demonstrate a delayed but strong improvement. Participants demonstrated strong to decisive reductions in symptoms, symptom anxiety, and decisive increases in health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Conclusions and inferences: A novel, four-session BGBT targeting cognitive and psychological flexibility in patients with esophageal disease was feasible, acceptable, and shows potential to improve symptom severity, symptom anxiety, and HRQoL. ACCORD's use of telemedicine may mitigate access issues related to BGBTs. Further study is warranted.

接受、承诺和认知修复(ACCORD)研究:简短的在线认知干预能否改善食管病患者的预后?
背景:认知和心理不灵活性是影响一个人如何解释和应对食道症状的两个心理过程。精神灵活性较差的患者面临预后较差的风险。脑-肠行为疗法(BGBT)是许多消化系统疾病的有效辅助治疗方法,具有提高心理灵活性的潜力。我们对食道疾病患者的认知和心理不灵活性进行了简短的干预试验。次要目标包括改善症状、情绪和生活质量(QoL),减少过度警觉和症状焦虑。方法:80名食管临床新诊断为贲门失弛缓症、嗜酸性食管炎、胃食管反流或功能性吞咽困难的成年人参加了一项非随机、开放标签的试验。接受、承诺和认知补救(ACCORD)是一项通过远程医疗进行的为期4周的新型BGBT。评估可行性和可接受性。评估基线和治疗后食管症状严重程度、认知和心理灵活性、高警惕性、症状焦虑和生活质量。6个月资料不完整的患者采用最后一次随访观察。贝叶斯因子评估研究假设的支持强度。主要结果:89.9%的参与者完成了ACCORD。认知灵活性和心理灵活性的一些指标出现了中度到决定性的提高,这可能显示出一种延迟但强烈的改善。参与者在症状、症状焦虑和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)方面表现出明显到决定性的减轻。结论和推断:一种针对食管病患者认知和心理灵活性的新型四期BGBT是可行的、可接受的,并且显示出改善症状严重程度、症状焦虑和HRQoL的潜力。ACCORD使用远程医疗可以缓解与BGBTs相关的访问问题。值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信