Reassessing the Risk of Esophageal Cancer in Achalasia Post-Therapy: Findings From a Large United States Multi-Centre Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Varan Perananthan, Mouhand F Mohammed, Azizullah Beran, Osama Hamid, D Chamil Codipilly, Diana L Snyder, Cadman Leggett, Jeffrey A Alexander, Marcelo Vela, Karthik Ravi
{"title":"Reassessing the Risk of Esophageal Cancer in Achalasia Post-Therapy: Findings From a Large United States Multi-Centre Retrospective Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Varan Perananthan, Mouhand F Mohammed, Azizullah Beran, Osama Hamid, D Chamil Codipilly, Diana L Snyder, Cadman Leggett, Jeffrey A Alexander, Marcelo Vela, Karthik Ravi","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achalasia is associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer; though reported incidence rates vary widely (0.4% to 9.2%) due to differences in demographics, follow-up duration, and diagnostic methods. This study evaluates the risk of esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus (BE) in achalasia using a large national database and a propensity-matched control cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Achalasia patients were identified utilizing the TriNetX database based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for diagnostic procedures and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) directed therapies, including Heller myotomy, peroral endoscopic myotomy, and pneumatic dilation. A matched control group of celiac disease patients was used. A 1-year lead time was applied to exclude secondary malignant achalasia. Outcomes included the incidence of esophageal cancer and BE, with subgroup analysis in patients following therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7863 achalasia patients (mean age 58.0, 51.9% female), the esophageal cancer risk was significantly higher than control (risk ratio 2.87, 95% CI: 1.56-5.27, p < 0.001). The absolute risk was low, with 40 cases (0.51%) over a mean follow-up of 3.18 years. BE risk was also higher in achalasia (risk ratio 1.54, 95% CI: 1.24-1.90, p < 0.001), with 220 cases (2.80%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in BE risk between POEM and Heller myotomy (risk ratio 1.0, 95% CI: 0.42-2.40, p > 0.99).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The elevated cancer risk in achalasia over a short follow-up period warrants reconsideration of current endoscopic surveillance guidelines, despite the low absolute risk of esophageal cancer and BE.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achalasia is associated with an increased risk of esophageal cancer; though reported incidence rates vary widely (0.4% to 9.2%) due to differences in demographics, follow-up duration, and diagnostic methods. This study evaluates the risk of esophageal cancer and Barrett's esophagus (BE) in achalasia using a large national database and a propensity-matched control cohort.

Methods: Achalasia patients were identified utilizing the TriNetX database based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for diagnostic procedures and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) directed therapies, including Heller myotomy, peroral endoscopic myotomy, and pneumatic dilation. A matched control group of celiac disease patients was used. A 1-year lead time was applied to exclude secondary malignant achalasia. Outcomes included the incidence of esophageal cancer and BE, with subgroup analysis in patients following therapy.

Results: Among 7863 achalasia patients (mean age 58.0, 51.9% female), the esophageal cancer risk was significantly higher than control (risk ratio 2.87, 95% CI: 1.56-5.27, p < 0.001). The absolute risk was low, with 40 cases (0.51%) over a mean follow-up of 3.18 years. BE risk was also higher in achalasia (risk ratio 1.54, 95% CI: 1.24-1.90, p < 0.001), with 220 cases (2.80%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in BE risk between POEM and Heller myotomy (risk ratio 1.0, 95% CI: 0.42-2.40, p > 0.99).

Discussion: The elevated cancer risk in achalasia over a short follow-up period warrants reconsideration of current endoscopic surveillance guidelines, despite the low absolute risk of esophageal cancer and BE.

重新评估贲门失弛缓症治疗后食管癌的风险:来自美国一项大型多中心回顾性倾向匹配队列研究的结果。
背景:贲门失弛缓症与食管癌风险增加有关;尽管由于人口统计学、随访时间和诊断方法的差异,报道的发病率差异很大(0.4%至9.2%)。本研究利用一个大型国家数据库和一个倾向匹配的对照队列,评估贲门失弛缓症患者食管癌和巴雷特食管(BE)的风险。方法:根据国际疾病分类(ICD)和现行程序术语(CPT)代码,利用TriNetX数据库识别贲门失弛缓症患者,用于诊断程序和食管下括约肌(LES)指导治疗,包括Heller肌切开术、经口内窥镜肌切开术和气动扩张。使用了一个匹配的乳糜泻患者对照组。提前1年排除继发性恶性贲门失弛缓症。结果包括食管癌和BE的发病率,并对治疗后的患者进行亚组分析。结果:7863例贲门失弛缓症患者(平均年龄58.0岁,女性51.9%)食管癌风险显著高于对照组(风险比2.87,95% CI: 1.56 ~ 5.27, p 0.99)。讨论:尽管食管癌和BE的绝对风险较低,但贲门失弛缓症在短期随访期间的癌症风险升高值得重新考虑当前的内镜监测指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信