pHoenix Score: Validation of a Novel Metric to Improve Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using 24-Hour pH Monitoring.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrés R Latorre-Rodríguez, Sai Pidathala, Ross M Bremner, Sumeet K Mittal
{"title":"pHoenix Score: Validation of a Novel Metric to Improve Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using 24-Hour pH Monitoring.","authors":"Andrés R Latorre-Rodríguez, Sai Pidathala, Ross M Bremner, Sumeet K Mittal","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pHoenix score (pHx-S) is a simple pH-monitoring metric developed to improve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis by integrating upright and supine acid exposure time (AET) to reduce \"inconclusive\" cases compared to AET alone. Since the pHx-S was derived from 48-h wireless studies, we aimed to validate its use in transnasal catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study of patients undergoing 24-h pH monitoring for suspected GERD (2016-2024). Diagnostic cutoffs for the pHx-S were ≤ 7.06 (normal), 7.06-8.45 (inconclusive), and ≥ 8.45 (pathological). Its predictive performance was validated against the DeMeester score (DMS) and compared to total AET. We also evaluated the impact of meal period inclusion/exclusion on the DMS, AET, and pHx-S.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 318 individuals (199 [62.6%] women; median age, 58 [46-67] years), 170 (53.5%) presented with pathological acid exposure based on DMS. Using total AET alone, 150 (47.2%), 35 (11%), and 133 (41.8%) were classified as normal, inconclusive, and pathological, respectively. Using the pHx-S, 148 cases (46.5%) were classified as normal and 155 (48.7%) as pathological. Notably, only 15 cases (4.7%) were considered borderline using the pHx-S, a 57.1% reduction (p = 0.015) compared to total AET. Sensitivity/specificity of the pHx-S were 97.6%/97.3% (lower threshold) and 91.2%/100% (upper threshold). Inclusion/exclusion of meals had minimal impact on diagnosis by DMS, AET, or pHx-S.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pHx-S improves GERD diagnosis by reducing inconclusive cases, simplifying the calculation, accounting for the disease spectrum, and eliminating the need for meal recording compliance with comparable accuracy to the DMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pHoenix score (pHx-S) is a simple pH-monitoring metric developed to improve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis by integrating upright and supine acid exposure time (AET) to reduce "inconclusive" cases compared to AET alone. Since the pHx-S was derived from 48-h wireless studies, we aimed to validate its use in transnasal catheter-based 24-h pH monitoring.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study of patients undergoing 24-h pH monitoring for suspected GERD (2016-2024). Diagnostic cutoffs for the pHx-S were ≤ 7.06 (normal), 7.06-8.45 (inconclusive), and ≥ 8.45 (pathological). Its predictive performance was validated against the DeMeester score (DMS) and compared to total AET. We also evaluated the impact of meal period inclusion/exclusion on the DMS, AET, and pHx-S.

Results: Of 318 individuals (199 [62.6%] women; median age, 58 [46-67] years), 170 (53.5%) presented with pathological acid exposure based on DMS. Using total AET alone, 150 (47.2%), 35 (11%), and 133 (41.8%) were classified as normal, inconclusive, and pathological, respectively. Using the pHx-S, 148 cases (46.5%) were classified as normal and 155 (48.7%) as pathological. Notably, only 15 cases (4.7%) were considered borderline using the pHx-S, a 57.1% reduction (p = 0.015) compared to total AET. Sensitivity/specificity of the pHx-S were 97.6%/97.3% (lower threshold) and 91.2%/100% (upper threshold). Inclusion/exclusion of meals had minimal impact on diagnosis by DMS, AET, or pHx-S.

Conclusions: The pHx-S improves GERD diagnosis by reducing inconclusive cases, simplifying the calculation, accounting for the disease spectrum, and eliminating the need for meal recording compliance with comparable accuracy to the DMS.

pHoenix评分:利用24小时pH监测提高胃食管反流病诊断的新指标的验证
背景:pHoenix评分(pHx-S)是一种简单的ph监测指标,通过整合直立和仰卧酸暴露时间(AET)来改善胃食管反流病(GERD)的诊断,以减少与单独AET相比“不确定”的病例。由于pHx-S来源于48小时无线研究,我们旨在验证其在经鼻导管24小时pH监测中的应用。方法:我们对2016-2024年接受24小时pH监测的疑似胃食管反流患者进行了一项单中心横断面研究。pHx-S的诊断临界值分别为≤7.06(正常)、7.06-8.45(不确定)和≥8.45(病理)。根据DeMeester评分(DMS)验证其预测性能,并与总AET进行比较。我们还评估了餐期纳入/排除对DMS、AET和pHx-S的影响。结果:318例(199例[62.6%]女性,中位年龄58[46-67]岁)中,170例(53.5%)基于DMS表现为病理性酸暴露。单独使用总AET,分别有150例(47.2%)、35例(11%)和133例(41.8%)被分类为正常、不确定和病理。应用pHx-S检查,148例(46.5%)为正常,155例(48.7%)为病理。值得注意的是,使用pHx-S,只有15例(4.7%)被认为是临界,与总AET相比减少了57.1% (p = 0.015)。pHx-S的敏感性和特异性分别为97.6%/97.3%(下阈值)和91.2%/100%(上阈值)。纳入/排除膳食对DMS、AET或pHx-S诊断的影响最小。结论:pHx-S通过减少不确定病例,简化计算,考虑疾病谱,消除对膳食记录依从性的需要,提高了GERD的诊断,其准确性与DMS相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信