A conceptual model to quantify probabilistic dike breach outflow.

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Natural Hazards Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1007/s11069-025-07500-z
Leon S Besseling, Anouk Bomers, Jord J Warmink, Suzanne J M H Hulscher
{"title":"A conceptual model to quantify probabilistic dike breach outflow.","authors":"Leon S Besseling, Anouk Bomers, Jord J Warmink, Suzanne J M H Hulscher","doi":"10.1007/s11069-025-07500-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hydrodynamic models can provide accurate information on the consequences of a dike breach, but their long computation times hinder the analysis of uncertainties and scenarios during a time-sensitive emergency situation. Conceptual models use simplified rules and relations, and allow for much faster computation while preserving reasonable accuracy. In this study, we develop a conceptual model with breach growth that estimates the dike breach outflow for varying river discharge events and for varying dike breach locations along the Rhine's bifurcations in the Netherlands and Germany. The results show that the model is able to provide a good estimate of the breach outflow, regardless of river discharge waves shape and peak discharge. The model achieves an approximate error of 10 to 15% compared to an operational hydrodynamic model of the study area. Its computation speed allows the analysis of thousands of scenarios per minute, enabling decision makers to probabilistically analyse breach outflow hydrographs at sampled critical water levels for an incoming extreme river discharge wave. We conclude that this conceptual model can provide realistic first estimates of breach outflow for large-scale dike breaches, while requiring little input data and computational time.</p>","PeriodicalId":18792,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards","volume":"121 15","pages":"17935-17963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07500-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrodynamic models can provide accurate information on the consequences of a dike breach, but their long computation times hinder the analysis of uncertainties and scenarios during a time-sensitive emergency situation. Conceptual models use simplified rules and relations, and allow for much faster computation while preserving reasonable accuracy. In this study, we develop a conceptual model with breach growth that estimates the dike breach outflow for varying river discharge events and for varying dike breach locations along the Rhine's bifurcations in the Netherlands and Germany. The results show that the model is able to provide a good estimate of the breach outflow, regardless of river discharge waves shape and peak discharge. The model achieves an approximate error of 10 to 15% compared to an operational hydrodynamic model of the study area. Its computation speed allows the analysis of thousands of scenarios per minute, enabling decision makers to probabilistically analyse breach outflow hydrographs at sampled critical water levels for an incoming extreme river discharge wave. We conclude that this conceptual model can provide realistic first estimates of breach outflow for large-scale dike breaches, while requiring little input data and computational time.

一个量化概率堤口流出量的概念模型。
水动力模型可以提供关于决堤后果的准确信息,但其计算时间长阻碍了对时间敏感的紧急情况下的不确定性和情景的分析。概念模型使用简化的规则和关系,允许更快的计算,同时保持合理的准确性。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个具有决口增长的概念模型,该模型可以估计荷兰和德国莱茵河分叉处不同河流排放事件和不同决口位置的决口流出量。结果表明,该模型能够较好地估计出在不考虑河流流量波形和峰值流量的情况下的决口流出量。与研究区域的实际水动力模型相比,该模型的误差约为10%至15%。它的计算速度允许每分钟分析数千个场景,使决策者能够在采样的临界水位上对即将到来的极端河流流量进行概率分析。我们得出结论,该概念模型可以为大规模决口提供真实的决口流出量的初步估计,同时需要很少的输入数据和计算时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Hazards
Natural Hazards 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
568
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Natural Hazards is devoted to original research work on all aspects of natural hazards, the forecasting of catastrophic events, their risk management, and the nature of precursors of natural and/or technological hazards. Although the origin of hazards can be different sources and systems (atmospheric, hydrologic, oceanographic, volcanologic, seismic, neotectonic), the environmental impacts are equally catastrophic. This circumstance warrants a tight interaction between the different scientific and operational disciplines, which should enhance the mitigation of hazards. Hazards of interest to the journal are included in the following sections: general, atmospheric, climatological, oceanographic, storm surges, tsunamis, floods, snow, avalanches, landslides, erosion, earthquakes, volcanoes, man-made, technological, and risk assessment. The interactions between these hazards and society are also addressed in the journal and include risk governance, disaster response and preventive actions such as spatial planning and remedial measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信