Impact of diet in shaping gut virome of grain-fed and grass-fed beef cattle revealed by a comparative metagenomic study.

IF 12.7 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Yujie Zhang, Yen-Te Liao, Fang Liu, Robert W Li, Vivian C H Wu
{"title":"Impact of diet in shaping gut virome of grain-fed and grass-fed beef cattle revealed by a comparative metagenomic study.","authors":"Yujie Zhang, Yen-Te Liao, Fang Liu, Robert W Li, Vivian C H Wu","doi":"10.1186/s40168-025-02163-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States beef industry, grain-feeding and grass-feeding are the two most common types of cattle feeding. Different feeding methods are likely to affect gut microbiota compositions and subsequently change microbial adaptation and cattle metabolism. However, there is limited information regarding the impact of diet on cattle gastrointestinal virome. This study examined the composition of fecal virome from grain-fed and grass-fed beef cattle and identified unique virome features to understand the relationship between these two feeding types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six grain-fed and six grass-fed Angus beef cattle were weighed, and their fecal samples were collected for further viral metagenomic sequencing. The difference in animal growth revealed a significantly higher post-weaning weight in grain-fed cattle than in grass-fed cattle after day 56. Furthermore, the analysis of the fecal viral population showed that approximately 795 and 1266 predicted viral sequences were obtained in the grain-fed and grass-fed samples, respectively. Among those, 54.3% of the grain-fed and 26.3% of the grass-fed viral sequences were identified as known viruses. The taxonomic classification showed that viruses belonging to the order Caudovirales, mostly bacteriophages, dominated the cattle virome in both sample groups, followed by the order Cremeviriles and Petitvirales. At the family level, 13 and 16 different viral families were detected in the grain and grass-fed groups, respectively. The comparison of virome features from the two groups indicated that the viral population from the kingdom Bamfordvirae had a significantly higher abundance in the grain-fed group than in the grass-fed cattle virome. In contrast, the kingdom Heunggongvirae had a significantly higher abundance in the grass-fed group than in the grain-fed cattle virome. Moreover, the viruses, belonging to the order Caudovirales and the family Podoviridae, had significantly higher abundances in the grass-fed virome than in the grain-fed virome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate the influence of animal feeds on the changes in gastrointestinal viral compositions and their potential association with cattle weight gain. The current outcome can contribute to further understanding of phage-bacterial interactions and their underlying mechanisms in regulating the animal host's metabolism and feed efficiency. Video Abstract.</p>","PeriodicalId":18447,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome","volume":"13 1","pages":"190"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-025-02163-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United States beef industry, grain-feeding and grass-feeding are the two most common types of cattle feeding. Different feeding methods are likely to affect gut microbiota compositions and subsequently change microbial adaptation and cattle metabolism. However, there is limited information regarding the impact of diet on cattle gastrointestinal virome. This study examined the composition of fecal virome from grain-fed and grass-fed beef cattle and identified unique virome features to understand the relationship between these two feeding types.

Results: Six grain-fed and six grass-fed Angus beef cattle were weighed, and their fecal samples were collected for further viral metagenomic sequencing. The difference in animal growth revealed a significantly higher post-weaning weight in grain-fed cattle than in grass-fed cattle after day 56. Furthermore, the analysis of the fecal viral population showed that approximately 795 and 1266 predicted viral sequences were obtained in the grain-fed and grass-fed samples, respectively. Among those, 54.3% of the grain-fed and 26.3% of the grass-fed viral sequences were identified as known viruses. The taxonomic classification showed that viruses belonging to the order Caudovirales, mostly bacteriophages, dominated the cattle virome in both sample groups, followed by the order Cremeviriles and Petitvirales. At the family level, 13 and 16 different viral families were detected in the grain and grass-fed groups, respectively. The comparison of virome features from the two groups indicated that the viral population from the kingdom Bamfordvirae had a significantly higher abundance in the grain-fed group than in the grass-fed cattle virome. In contrast, the kingdom Heunggongvirae had a significantly higher abundance in the grass-fed group than in the grain-fed cattle virome. Moreover, the viruses, belonging to the order Caudovirales and the family Podoviridae, had significantly higher abundances in the grass-fed virome than in the grain-fed virome.

Conclusions: The findings indicate the influence of animal feeds on the changes in gastrointestinal viral compositions and their potential association with cattle weight gain. The current outcome can contribute to further understanding of phage-bacterial interactions and their underlying mechanisms in regulating the animal host's metabolism and feed efficiency. Video Abstract.

一项比较宏基因组研究揭示了饮食对谷物饲养和草饲肉牛肠道病毒群形成的影响。
背景:在美国牛肉产业中,谷物饲养和牧草饲养是两种最常见的牛饲养方式。不同的饲喂方式可能会影响肠道菌群组成,从而改变微生物的适应和牛的代谢。然而,关于饲料对牛胃肠道病毒的影响的信息有限。本研究检测了谷物饲养和草饲肉牛粪便病毒组的组成,并鉴定了独特的病毒组特征,以了解这两种饲养类型之间的关系。结果:对6头谷饲和6头草饲安格斯肉牛进行称重,采集粪便样本进行病毒宏基因组测序。动物生长差异表明,第56天谷物饲牛断奶后体重显著高于草饲牛。此外,粪便病毒群分析表明,在谷物饲料和草料饲料样品中分别获得了大约795和1266个预测病毒序列。其中,54.3%的谷物饲料和26.3%的草食饲料病毒序列被鉴定为已知病毒。分类学结果表明,在两个样本组中,以噬菌体为主的尾病毒目病毒组占主导地位,其次是乳突病毒目和小病毒目。在科水平上,籽饲组和草饲组分别检测到13个和16个不同的病毒科。两组的病毒组特征比较表明,来自Bamfordvirae王国的病毒群在谷物饲养组中的丰度明显高于草饲牛病毒组。相比之下,兴宫病毒王国在草饲组中的丰度明显高于谷物饲养的牛病毒组。此外,属于尾状病毒目和足状病毒科的病毒在草食病毒组中的丰度显著高于谷物饲料病毒组。结论:研究结果表明动物饲料对牛胃肠道病毒组成变化的影响及其与牛体重增加的潜在关联。目前的结果有助于进一步了解噬菌体-细菌相互作用及其调节动物宿主代谢和饲料效率的潜在机制。视频摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiome
Microbiome MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
198
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbiome is a journal that focuses on studies of microbiomes in humans, animals, plants, and the environment. It covers both natural and manipulated microbiomes, such as those in agriculture. The journal is interested in research that uses meta-omics approaches or novel bioinformatics tools and emphasizes the community/host interaction and structure-function relationship within the microbiome. Studies that go beyond descriptive omics surveys and include experimental or theoretical approaches will be considered for publication. The journal also encourages research that establishes cause and effect relationships and supports proposed microbiome functions. However, studies of individual microbial isolates/species without exploring their impact on the host or the complex microbiome structures and functions will not be considered for publication. Microbiome is indexed in BIOSIS, Current Contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citations Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信