Brain Atrophy Does Not Predict Clinical Progression in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.
IF 7.6
1区 医学
Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrea Quattrone,Nicolai Franzmeier,Hans-Jürgen Huppertz,Nicholas Seneca,Gabor C Petzold,Annika Spottke,Johannes Levin,Johannes Prudlo,Emrah Düzel, ,Günter U Höglinger
求助PDF
{"title":"Brain Atrophy Does Not Predict Clinical Progression in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.","authors":"Andrea Quattrone,Nicolai Franzmeier,Hans-Jürgen Huppertz,Nicholas Seneca,Gabor C Petzold,Annika Spottke,Johannes Levin,Johannes Prudlo,Emrah Düzel, ,Günter U Höglinger","doi":"10.1002/mds.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nClinical progression rate is the typical primary endpoint measure in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) clinical trials.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nThis longitudinal multicohort study investigated whether baseline clinical severity and regional brain atrophy could predict clinical progression in PSP-Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPSP-RS patients (n = 309) from the placebo arms of clinical trials (NCT03068468, NCT01110720, NCT02985879, NCT01049399) and DescribePSP cohort were included. We investigated associations of baseline clinical and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data with 1-year longitudinal PSP rating scale (PSPRS) change. Machine learning (ML) models were tested to predict individual clinical trajectories.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nPSP-RS patients showed a mean PSPRS score increase of 10.3 points/yr. The frontal lobe volume showed the strongest association with subsequent clinical progression (β: -0.34, P < 0.001). However, ML models did not accurately predict individual progression rates (R2 <0.15).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nBaseline clinical severity and brain atrophy could not predict individual clinical progression, suggesting no need for MRI-based stratification of patients in future PSP trials. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.70026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Clinical progression rate is the typical primary endpoint measure in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES
This longitudinal multicohort study investigated whether baseline clinical severity and regional brain atrophy could predict clinical progression in PSP-Richardson's syndrome (PSP-RS).
METHODS
PSP-RS patients (n = 309) from the placebo arms of clinical trials (NCT03068468, NCT01110720, NCT02985879, NCT01049399) and DescribePSP cohort were included. We investigated associations of baseline clinical and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data with 1-year longitudinal PSP rating scale (PSPRS) change. Machine learning (ML) models were tested to predict individual clinical trajectories.
RESULTS
PSP-RS patients showed a mean PSPRS score increase of 10.3 points/yr. The frontal lobe volume showed the strongest association with subsequent clinical progression (β: -0.34, P < 0.001). However, ML models did not accurately predict individual progression rates (R2 <0.15).
CONCLUSIONS
Baseline clinical severity and brain atrophy could not predict individual clinical progression, suggesting no need for MRI-based stratification of patients in future PSP trials. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
脑萎缩不能预测进行性核上性麻痹的临床进展。
临床进展率是进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)临床试验中典型的主要终点指标。目的:本纵向多队列研究探讨基线临床严重程度和区域性脑萎缩是否可以预测psp -理查德森综合征(PSP-RS)的临床进展。方法纳入来自临床试验(NCT03068468、NCT01110720、NCT02985879、NCT01049399)安慰剂组和descripbepsp队列的spsp - rs患者(n = 309)。我们研究了基线临床和体积磁共振成像(MRI)数据与1年纵向PSP评定量表(PSPRS)变化的关系。测试机器学习(ML)模型来预测个体临床轨迹。结果spsp - rs患者PSPRS评分平均升高10.3分/年。额叶体积与随后的临床进展相关性最强(β: -0.34, P < 0.001)。然而,ML模型不能准确预测个体进展率(R2 <0.15)。结论:基线临床严重程度和脑萎缩不能预测个体临床进展,提示在未来的PSP试验中不需要对患者进行基于mri的分层。©2025作者。Wiley期刊有限责任公司代表国际帕金森和运动障碍学会出版的《运动障碍》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
来源期刊
期刊介绍:
Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.