Assessment of giant cell arteritis-associated visual outcomes at a tertiary hospital in Ontario, Canada.

Mats L Junek,Rahul Chanchlani,Amadeo R Rodriguez,Nader Khalidi,Amber O Molnar
{"title":"Assessment of giant cell arteritis-associated visual outcomes at a tertiary hospital in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Mats L Junek,Rahul Chanchlani,Amadeo R Rodriguez,Nader Khalidi,Amber O Molnar","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2025-0459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThere are limited data concerning outcomes in those with giant cell arteritis-associated vision changes (GCA, GCAVCs). We estimated the association of intravenous, compared to oral, glucocorticoids with outcomes in GCAVCs.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary healthcare facility in Ontario, Canada. Individuals aged 50 years or older with an international classification of disease version 10 (ICD-10) diagnostic code for GCA associated with a healthcare visit between November 2017 to December 2023 were identified for inclusion. Diagnoses of GCA were verified as the final diagnosis of the treating clinician and were required to be supported by histologic, radiographic, and/or biochemical evidence of inflammatory vasculopathy. GCAVCs were identified by clinical assessments. Treatment exposures were defined as whether the individual was first exposed to intravenous or oral glucocorticoids. The primary outcome was reported visual improvement after treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate treatment effects adjusting for demographic and disease factors.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn 289 individuals with GCA, 77 (26.6%) had GCAVCs. 70.1% of GCAVCs led to permanent vision loss and visual recovery was seen in 16.0% of participants. We found no difference in outcomes for those first treated with intravenous versus oral glucocorticoids (adjusted odds ratios 0.43-1.72, 95% confidence interval range 0.02-123.68).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nGCAVCs are common and frequently associated with permanent vision loss. While the precision of our results was limited by sample size, we did not find evidence that IV before oral glucocorticoids was associated with visual improvement in GCAVCs.","PeriodicalId":501812,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2025-0459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE There are limited data concerning outcomes in those with giant cell arteritis-associated vision changes (GCA, GCAVCs). We estimated the association of intravenous, compared to oral, glucocorticoids with outcomes in GCAVCs. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary healthcare facility in Ontario, Canada. Individuals aged 50 years or older with an international classification of disease version 10 (ICD-10) diagnostic code for GCA associated with a healthcare visit between November 2017 to December 2023 were identified for inclusion. Diagnoses of GCA were verified as the final diagnosis of the treating clinician and were required to be supported by histologic, radiographic, and/or biochemical evidence of inflammatory vasculopathy. GCAVCs were identified by clinical assessments. Treatment exposures were defined as whether the individual was first exposed to intravenous or oral glucocorticoids. The primary outcome was reported visual improvement after treatment. We used logistic regression to estimate treatment effects adjusting for demographic and disease factors. RESULTS In 289 individuals with GCA, 77 (26.6%) had GCAVCs. 70.1% of GCAVCs led to permanent vision loss and visual recovery was seen in 16.0% of participants. We found no difference in outcomes for those first treated with intravenous versus oral glucocorticoids (adjusted odds ratios 0.43-1.72, 95% confidence interval range 0.02-123.68). CONCLUSION GCAVCs are common and frequently associated with permanent vision loss. While the precision of our results was limited by sample size, we did not find evidence that IV before oral glucocorticoids was associated with visual improvement in GCAVCs.
加拿大安大略省一家三级医院巨细胞动脉炎相关视力结果的评估
目的:关于巨细胞动脉炎相关视力改变(GCA, GCAVCs)患者预后的数据有限。与口服相比,我们估计静脉注射糖皮质激素与GCAVCs预后的关系。方法:我们在加拿大安大略省的一家三级医疗机构进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在2017年11月至2023年12月期间进行过医疗保健访问,并具有国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10) GCA诊断代码的50岁或以上的个体被确定为纳入。GCA的诊断被证实为治疗临床医生的最终诊断,需要有炎症性血管病变的组织学、影像学和/或生化证据的支持。通过临床评估确定GCAVCs。治疗暴露被定义为个体是否首次暴露于静脉注射或口服糖皮质激素。治疗后的主要结果为视力改善。我们使用逻辑回归来估计经人口统计学和疾病因素调整后的治疗效果。结果289例GCA患者中,有77例(26.6%)存在gcavc。70.1%的GCAVCs导致永久性视力丧失,16.0%的参与者出现视力恢复。我们发现首次静脉注射糖皮质激素与口服糖皮质激素治疗的结果无差异(校正优势比为0.43-1.72,95%可信区间为0.02-123.68)。结论cavc是一种常见的永久性视力丧失。虽然我们的结果的准确性受到样本量的限制,但我们没有发现静脉注射前口服糖皮质激素与GCAVCs的视力改善相关的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信