Insights from LLIN post-distribution monitoring surveys in the malaria transmission foci of the Dominican Republic: implications for quantification and distribution strategies.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gilda Ventura, María Yinet Santos Félix, Natalia Tejada Bueno, Nicole Michelén Ströfer, Jose Luis Cruz Raposo, Ángel Solís, Rafael German Barrios Parra, Lucía Fernández Montoya
{"title":"Insights from LLIN post-distribution monitoring surveys in the malaria transmission foci of the Dominican Republic: implications for quantification and distribution strategies.","authors":"Gilda Ventura, María Yinet Santos Félix, Natalia Tejada Bueno, Nicole Michelén Ströfer, Jose Luis Cruz Raposo, Ángel Solís, Rafael German Barrios Parra, Lucía Fernández Montoya","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05406-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have been distributed and installed in the Dominican Republic since 2008, and they remain the main vector control intervention used to pursue malaria elimination in the country. However, LLIN performance remains unclear due to a lack of monitoring over the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional household survey was conducted to monitor LLIN coverage, access, use, physical integrity, washing and drying practices, and the time people go to bed and wake up in the two main malaria foci of the country: Azua (4-6 months post-distribution and installation) and San Juan (one year post-distribution and installation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of sleeping spaces that could be covered with a LLIN given the LLINs present in the household was 64% in Azua and 63% in San Juan; with any net, coverage was 75% in Azua and 80% in San Juan. Reported LLIN retention was 88.4% in Azua and 80.9% in San Juan. The percentage of people who had access to sleeping under an LLIN was 58.8% in Azua and 65.4% in San Juan. Among people with LLIN access (people with enough LLINs to cover all sleeping spaces in their household), use was 48.8% in Azua and 75% in San Juan; and overall, LLINs use was 32.3% in Azua and 50.5% in San Juan. Most LLINs remained in serviceable physical condition (Azua: 96.4%, San Juan: 88.9%) but those with holes were not repaired. Most LLINs were washed with aggressive products (Azua: 65%, San Juan: 86%), at a frequency that suggests they will be washed more than twenty times in three years (Azua: 52%, San Juan: 73%), and dried under the sun (Azua: 75%, San Juan: 90%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor washing and drying practices are prevalent in both areas, low LLIN use was observed in Azua and some LLIN coverage gaps were measured in both foci. Urgent behavioural change strategies are needed to improve LLIN care in both foci and to increase LLIN use in Azua, alongside revisions to LLIN quantification methods to ensure full coverage of all sleeping spaces in use during installation. Heterogeneities in LLINs use across foci suggest the need for monitoring use in each distribution area to identify individual gaps and promptly address them.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"272"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12369129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05406-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have been distributed and installed in the Dominican Republic since 2008, and they remain the main vector control intervention used to pursue malaria elimination in the country. However, LLIN performance remains unclear due to a lack of monitoring over the past decade.

Methods: A cross-sectional household survey was conducted to monitor LLIN coverage, access, use, physical integrity, washing and drying practices, and the time people go to bed and wake up in the two main malaria foci of the country: Azua (4-6 months post-distribution and installation) and San Juan (one year post-distribution and installation).

Results: The percentage of sleeping spaces that could be covered with a LLIN given the LLINs present in the household was 64% in Azua and 63% in San Juan; with any net, coverage was 75% in Azua and 80% in San Juan. Reported LLIN retention was 88.4% in Azua and 80.9% in San Juan. The percentage of people who had access to sleeping under an LLIN was 58.8% in Azua and 65.4% in San Juan. Among people with LLIN access (people with enough LLINs to cover all sleeping spaces in their household), use was 48.8% in Azua and 75% in San Juan; and overall, LLINs use was 32.3% in Azua and 50.5% in San Juan. Most LLINs remained in serviceable physical condition (Azua: 96.4%, San Juan: 88.9%) but those with holes were not repaired. Most LLINs were washed with aggressive products (Azua: 65%, San Juan: 86%), at a frequency that suggests they will be washed more than twenty times in three years (Azua: 52%, San Juan: 73%), and dried under the sun (Azua: 75%, San Juan: 90%).

Conclusion: Poor washing and drying practices are prevalent in both areas, low LLIN use was observed in Azua and some LLIN coverage gaps were measured in both foci. Urgent behavioural change strategies are needed to improve LLIN care in both foci and to increase LLIN use in Azua, alongside revisions to LLIN quantification methods to ensure full coverage of all sleeping spaces in use during installation. Heterogeneities in LLINs use across foci suggest the need for monitoring use in each distribution area to identify individual gaps and promptly address them.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

来自多米尼加共和国疟疾传播疫源地的LLIN分发后监测调查的见解:对量化和分发战略的影响。
背景:自2008年以来,多米尼加共和国分发和安装了长效杀虫蚊帐,它们仍然是该国用于消除疟疾的主要病媒控制干预措施。然而,由于过去十年缺乏监测,LLIN的表现仍然不清楚。方法:在该国两个主要疟疾疫源地Azua(分发和安装后4-6个月)和San Juan(分发和安装后1年)进行了一项横断面家庭调查,以监测LLIN的覆盖率、获取、使用、身体完整性、洗涤和干燥做法以及人们睡觉和起床的时间。结果:考虑到家庭中存在的LLIN,可以用LLIN覆盖的睡眠空间百分比在Azua为64%,在圣胡安为63%;使用任何蚊帐,Azua的覆盖率为75%,圣胡安为80%。Azua的LLIN留存率为88.4%,San Juan为80.9%。在Azua有58.8%的人在LLIN下睡觉,在圣胡安有65.4%。在使用LLIN的人群中(有足够的LLIN覆盖家中所有睡眠空间的人群),Azua的使用率为48.8%,圣胡安为75%;总体而言,Azua和San Juan的LLINs使用率分别为32.3%和50.5%。大多数llin仍处于可使用状态(Azua: 96.4%, San Juan: 88.9%),但有孔的llin未修复。大多数LLINs都是用侵略性产品清洗的(Azua: 65%,圣胡安:86%),其频率表明它们将在三年内清洗20次以上(Azua: 52%,圣胡安:73%),并在阳光下晒干(Azua: 75%,圣胡安:90%)。结论:这两个地区普遍存在不良的洗涤和干燥做法,Azua的LLIN使用率较低,两个地区的LLIN覆盖率存在一定差距。需要采取紧急行为改变战略,以改善两个重点地区的LLIN护理,并增加Azua的LLIN使用,同时修订LLIN量化方法,以确保在安装期间使用的所有睡眠空间完全覆盖。lls在不同重点地区使用的异质性表明,需要监测每个分布地区的使用情况,以确定个别差距并迅速解决这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信