Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Pointe-Readiness Tests.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annette Karim, Christopher Patterson, Michael Wong
{"title":"Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Pointe-Readiness Tests.","authors":"Annette Karim, Christopher Patterson, Michael Wong","doi":"10.21091/mppa.2025.03008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate via video review the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of three pointe-readiness tests: the topple test, airplane test, and sauté test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten ballet-trained pre-professional and professional dancers were videotaped performing the topple test, airplane test, and sauté test from the front and side views. The videos, written instructions, and rater score sheets were provided to the raters via individually linked electronic access over four sessions, with a washout period of 2 weeks between sessions. The videos were reviewed at slow speed and at real-time speed, with two sessions at each speed, assigned in random order. Raters received a training session prior to the start of their first session. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for all raters for each test and for the total score of the three tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two raters assessed the 10 dancers. Intra-rater reliability was good between session 1 and session 2 for the real-time speed (ICC range = 0.83-0.88), good for the slow speed (ICC = 0.83-0.85), good to excellent for the average of real-time vs slow speed (ICC = 0.88-0.94), and excellent for session 1 vs session 2 (ICC = 0.93-0.96). Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for the first real-time speed (ICC = 0.88-0.94), for the first slow speed (ICC = 0.85-0.96), and for the first session regardless of speed (ICC = 0.88-0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The criteria for the pointe-readiness tests are acceptable. Raters with and without a dance background were able to conduct the movement assessments with good to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in real-time review.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":18336,"journal":{"name":"Medical problems of performing artists","volume":"40 3","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical problems of performing artists","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2025.03008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate via video review the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of three pointe-readiness tests: the topple test, airplane test, and sauté test.

Methods: Ten ballet-trained pre-professional and professional dancers were videotaped performing the topple test, airplane test, and sauté test from the front and side views. The videos, written instructions, and rater score sheets were provided to the raters via individually linked electronic access over four sessions, with a washout period of 2 weeks between sessions. The videos were reviewed at slow speed and at real-time speed, with two sessions at each speed, assigned in random order. Raters received a training session prior to the start of their first session. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for all raters for each test and for the total score of the three tests.

Results: Twenty-two raters assessed the 10 dancers. Intra-rater reliability was good between session 1 and session 2 for the real-time speed (ICC range = 0.83-0.88), good for the slow speed (ICC = 0.83-0.85), good to excellent for the average of real-time vs slow speed (ICC = 0.88-0.94), and excellent for session 1 vs session 2 (ICC = 0.93-0.96). Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for the first real-time speed (ICC = 0.88-0.94), for the first slow speed (ICC = 0.85-0.96), and for the first session regardless of speed (ICC = 0.88-0.96).

Conclusion: The criteria for the pointe-readiness tests are acceptable. Raters with and without a dance background were able to conduct the movement assessments with good to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in real-time review.

Level of evidence: III.

点准备测试的内部和内部信度。
目的:通过视频复习,探讨三点准备测验:翻倒测验、飞机测验和索氏测验的内部信度和内部信度。方法:对10名受过芭蕾舞训练的专业前舞者和专业舞者分别从正视图和侧视图对其进行俯卧撑测试、飞机测试和翻拍测试。视频、书面说明和评分表通过单独连接的电子访问在四个阶段提供给评分者,在两个阶段之间有两周的洗脱期。视频以慢速和实时两种速度进行审查,每种速度有两次会议,按随机顺序分配。评价者在第一阶段开始前接受了培训。计算每个测试中所有评分者的评分者内部和评分者之间的信度以及三个测试的总分的类内相关系数。结果:22名评分员对10名舞者进行了评估。在会话1和会话2之间,实时速度的内部可靠性良好(ICC范围= 0.83-0.88),慢速的内部可靠性良好(ICC = 0.83-0.85),实时和慢速的平均值的内部可靠性良好(ICC = 0.88-0.94),会话1和会话2的内部可靠性良好(ICC = 0.93-0.96)。对于第一次实时速度(ICC = 0.88-0.94)、第一次慢速(ICC = 0.85-0.96)和第一次不考虑速度的会话(ICC = 0.88-0.96),评分者之间的信度从好到优。结论:穴位准备试验的标准是可以接受的。有和没有舞蹈背景的评分者在实时评估中都能够进行运动评估,评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性良好。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Problems of Performing Artists is the first clinical medical journal devoted to the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of medical and psychological disorders related to the performing arts. Original peer-reviewed research papers cover topics including neurologic disorders, musculoskeletal conditions, voice and hearing disorders, anxieties, stress, substance abuse, and other health issues related to actors, dancers, singers, musicians, and other performers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信