Between-and within-socioeconomic groups temporal inequality in the uptake of malaria prevention strategies among pregnant women and under-five children in Ghana (2003-2022).

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Denis Okova, Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa, Marian Edusei, Paidamoyo Bodzo, Christian Atta-Obeng, Plaxcedes Chiwire, Charles Hongoro
{"title":"Between-and within-socioeconomic groups temporal inequality in the uptake of malaria prevention strategies among pregnant women and under-five children in Ghana (2003-2022).","authors":"Denis Okova, Akim Tafadzwa Lukwa, Marian Edusei, Paidamoyo Bodzo, Christian Atta-Obeng, Plaxcedes Chiwire, Charles Hongoro","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05512-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among pregnant women and children under five in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite over two decades of efforts including insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), universal and equitable coverage has not been achieved. In Ghana, coverage disparities persist, particularly along socioeconomic and geographic lines. This study investigates temporal trends and decomposes both within-group and between-group socioeconomic inequalities in ITN use and IPTp coverage among children and pregnant women in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed nationally representative data from the Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys (2003, 2008, 2014, and 2022), focusing on ITN use among pregnant women and children under five, and IPTp uptake. Inequality was assessed using the Erreygers normalized concentration index (ENCI) and the Theil index (GE 2). Theil indices were then decomposed to quantify within- and between-group contributions by socioeconomic status (SES) and residence (urban versus. rural).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ITN use among under-five children increased modestly from 58.1% (2003) to 62.9% (2022); among pregnant women, usage fluctuated but returned to 60% in 2022. IPTp coverage rose markedly from 0.85% (2003) to 60% (2022). ENCI values showed that ITN use was consistently pro-poor, becoming more concentrated among the poor over time (e.g., ENCI for pregnant women: - 0.04 in 2003 to - 0.32 in 2022). In contrast, IPTp coverage shifted to a pro-rich distribution from 2008 onwards. Theil decomposition revealed that most observed inequalities were driven by within-group disparities (e.g., within SES or residence categories), though between-group inequality increased over time particularly for IPTp. For example, in 2022, 85% of ITN inequality among pregnant women was within SES groups, while 18% was attributable to between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite overall improvements in malaria prevention uptake, substantial socioeconomic inequalities persist especially within social and geographic subgroups. Equity-focused strategies must complement national-level efforts by addressing barriers specific to underserved populations, including informal urban settlements and remote rural communities. Policymakers must prioritize targeted, locally responsive interventions to reduce both within- and between-group disparities and achieve Ghana's malaria elimination and health equity goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05512-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among pregnant women and children under five in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite over two decades of efforts including insecticide-treated net (ITN) distribution and intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), universal and equitable coverage has not been achieved. In Ghana, coverage disparities persist, particularly along socioeconomic and geographic lines. This study investigates temporal trends and decomposes both within-group and between-group socioeconomic inequalities in ITN use and IPTp coverage among children and pregnant women in Ghana.

Methods: This study analysed nationally representative data from the Ghana Demographic and Health Surveys (2003, 2008, 2014, and 2022), focusing on ITN use among pregnant women and children under five, and IPTp uptake. Inequality was assessed using the Erreygers normalized concentration index (ENCI) and the Theil index (GE 2). Theil indices were then decomposed to quantify within- and between-group contributions by socioeconomic status (SES) and residence (urban versus. rural).

Results: ITN use among under-five children increased modestly from 58.1% (2003) to 62.9% (2022); among pregnant women, usage fluctuated but returned to 60% in 2022. IPTp coverage rose markedly from 0.85% (2003) to 60% (2022). ENCI values showed that ITN use was consistently pro-poor, becoming more concentrated among the poor over time (e.g., ENCI for pregnant women: - 0.04 in 2003 to - 0.32 in 2022). In contrast, IPTp coverage shifted to a pro-rich distribution from 2008 onwards. Theil decomposition revealed that most observed inequalities were driven by within-group disparities (e.g., within SES or residence categories), though between-group inequality increased over time particularly for IPTp. For example, in 2022, 85% of ITN inequality among pregnant women was within SES groups, while 18% was attributable to between-group differences.

Conclusion: Despite overall improvements in malaria prevention uptake, substantial socioeconomic inequalities persist especially within social and geographic subgroups. Equity-focused strategies must complement national-level efforts by addressing barriers specific to underserved populations, including informal urban settlements and remote rural communities. Policymakers must prioritize targeted, locally responsive interventions to reduce both within- and between-group disparities and achieve Ghana's malaria elimination and health equity goals.

Abstract Image

2003-2022年,加纳孕妇和五岁以下儿童在接受疟疾预防战略方面的社会经济群体之间和内部的时间不平等。
背景:疟疾仍然是撒哈拉以南非洲孕妇和五岁以下儿童发病和死亡的主要原因。尽管经过20多年的努力,包括分发经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)和孕期间歇预防治疗(IPTp),但仍未实现普遍和公平覆盖。在加纳,覆盖差距仍然存在,特别是在社会经济和地理方面。本研究调查了加纳儿童和孕妇在ITN使用和IPTp覆盖方面的时间趋势,并分解了组内和组间的社会经济不平等。方法:本研究分析了加纳人口与健康调查(2003年、2008年、2014年和2022年)的全国代表性数据,重点关注孕妇和五岁以下儿童使用ITN和IPTp的情况。使用Erreygers标准化浓度指数(ENCI)和Theil指数(ge2)评估不平等。然后对这些指数进行分解,以量化社会经济地位(SES)和居住地(城市与城市)对组内和组间的贡献。农村)。结果:5岁以下儿童ITN使用率从2003年的58.1%小幅上升至2022年的62.9%;孕妇的使用率有所波动,但在2022年恢复到60%。IPTp覆盖率从0.85%(2003年)显著上升到60%(2022年)。ENCI值显示,ITN的使用始终有利于穷人,随着时间的推移,越来越集中于穷人(例如,孕妇的ENCI: 2003年为- 0.04,到2022年为- 0.32)。相比之下,从2008年起,IPTp的覆盖范围转向了有利于富人的分布。它们的分解表明,大多数观察到的不平等是由群体内的差异(例如,在SES或居住类别内)驱动的,尽管群体间的不平等随着时间的推移而增加,特别是对于IPTp。例如,在2022年,85%的孕妇ITN不平等发生在社会经济地位群体内,而18%可归因于群体间差异。结论:尽管在疟疾预防方面取得了总体进展,但社会经济不平等现象仍然存在,特别是在社会和地理亚群体中。注重公平的战略必须与国家一级的努力相辅相成,解决服务不足人群所特有的障碍,包括非正规城市住区和偏远农村社区。决策者必须优先考虑有针对性的、地方反应性的干预措施,以减少群体内部和群体之间的差距,实现加纳消除疟疾和卫生公平的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信