Optimized motion-insensitive PDFF mapping of the liver.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jiayi Tang, Daiki Tamada, Raphael do Vale Souza, Aaron Faacks, Jitka Starekova, Julius F Heidenreich, Lukas Müller, Garrett C Fullerton, Collin J Buelo, Jeff Kammerman, Jean H Brittain, Scott B Reeder, Diego Hernando
{"title":"Optimized motion-insensitive PDFF mapping of the liver.","authors":"Jiayi Tang, Daiki Tamada, Raphael do Vale Souza, Aaron Faacks, Jitka Starekova, Julius F Heidenreich, Lukas Müller, Garrett C Fullerton, Collin J Buelo, Jeff Kammerman, Jean H Brittain, Scott B Reeder, Diego Hernando","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To implement, optimize, and validate parallel imaging (PI)-accelerated, 2D, flip angle modulated (FAM) chemical shift-encoded quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction (PDFF), with motion insensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The optimization cost function that determines flip angles in FAM was generalized for PI. Phantom studies and prospective studies in volunteers with varying liver fat levels were performed. Free-breathing FAM was acquired in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, with varying nominal PI acceleration factors (R) of 1.0 to 3.0. A breath-held, commercially available 3D chemical shift-encoded method was acquired as reference for PDFF. Overall image quality, qualitative SNR, and motion artifacts for all methods were Likert-scale rated. PDFF measured by FAM was compared to reference to assess bias. Test-retest repeatability was assessed for all methods by repeating acquisitions after volunteer repositioning. Noise performance was assessed with standard deviation of PDFF maps as R increased.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reader study (N = 3 readers/10 subjects) demonstrated excellent image quality for FAM during free-breathing, with reduced motion artifacts compared to breath-held reference (p < 0.01). PI-accelerated FAM shows fewer motion artifacts than unaccelerated FAM (p < 0.01). In all planes and accelerations, PDFF measured by FAM showed good agreement with reference PDFF measurements (mean bias: -0.4% to 2.0% PDFF; 95% limits of agreement: 2.8% to 4.0% PDFF). FAM in axial and coronal planes showed similar or improved repeatability (repeatability coefficient = 1.7% to 2.6% PDFF) compared to the reference (2.7%). Sagittal FAM shows similar or worse repeatability (repeatability coefficient = 3.0% to 3.6%). FAM with R = 2.0 has good noise performance and high SNR efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FAM, in axial or coronal planes with R = 2.0, is optimal for motion-insensitive liver PDFF quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To implement, optimize, and validate parallel imaging (PI)-accelerated, 2D, flip angle modulated (FAM) chemical shift-encoded quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction (PDFF), with motion insensitivity.

Methods: The optimization cost function that determines flip angles in FAM was generalized for PI. Phantom studies and prospective studies in volunteers with varying liver fat levels were performed. Free-breathing FAM was acquired in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, with varying nominal PI acceleration factors (R) of 1.0 to 3.0. A breath-held, commercially available 3D chemical shift-encoded method was acquired as reference for PDFF. Overall image quality, qualitative SNR, and motion artifacts for all methods were Likert-scale rated. PDFF measured by FAM was compared to reference to assess bias. Test-retest repeatability was assessed for all methods by repeating acquisitions after volunteer repositioning. Noise performance was assessed with standard deviation of PDFF maps as R increased.

Results: The reader study (N = 3 readers/10 subjects) demonstrated excellent image quality for FAM during free-breathing, with reduced motion artifacts compared to breath-held reference (p < 0.01). PI-accelerated FAM shows fewer motion artifacts than unaccelerated FAM (p < 0.01). In all planes and accelerations, PDFF measured by FAM showed good agreement with reference PDFF measurements (mean bias: -0.4% to 2.0% PDFF; 95% limits of agreement: 2.8% to 4.0% PDFF). FAM in axial and coronal planes showed similar or improved repeatability (repeatability coefficient = 1.7% to 2.6% PDFF) compared to the reference (2.7%). Sagittal FAM shows similar or worse repeatability (repeatability coefficient = 3.0% to 3.6%). FAM with R = 2.0 has good noise performance and high SNR efficiency.

Conclusion: FAM, in axial or coronal planes with R = 2.0, is optimal for motion-insensitive liver PDFF quantification.

优化运动不敏感的肝脏PDFF映射。
目的:实现、优化和验证平行成像(PI)加速、二维、翻转角调制(FAM)化学位移编码的肝质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)定量,运动不敏感。方法:将FAM中决定翻转角度的优化代价函数推广到PI。在不同肝脏脂肪水平的志愿者中进行了幻影研究和前瞻性研究。在轴、矢状面和冠状面获得自由呼吸FAM,标称PI加速因子(R)在1.0至3.0之间变化。获得了一种屏气的、市售的3D化学位移编码方法,作为PDFF的参考。所有方法的整体图像质量、定性信噪比和运动伪影均按李克特量表评定。将FAM测量的PDFF与参考文献进行比较以评估偏倚。在志愿者重新定位后,通过重复采集来评估所有方法的测试-重测重复性。随着R的增加,用PDFF图的标准差评估噪声性能。结果:阅读器研究(N = 3个阅读器/10名受试者)显示自由呼吸时FAM的图像质量很好,与屏住呼吸的参考相比,运动伪影减少(p结论:FAM,在轴位或冠状面,R = 2.0,是运动不敏感的肝脏PDFF量化的最佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信