Validation of the Japanese Version of the Survey of Perceived Supervisor Support.

Q3 Medicine
Takahiro Mori, Kiminori Odagami, Tomohisa Nagata, Akiomi Inoue, Koji Mori
{"title":"Validation of the Japanese Version of the Survey of Perceived Supervisor Support.","authors":"Takahiro Mori, Kiminori Odagami, Tomohisa Nagata, Akiomi Inoue, Koji Mori","doi":"10.7888/juoeh.47.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceived supervisor support (PSS) is an important factor in employees' health and well-being, and organizational outcomes. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Supervisor Support (SPSS-J) and to evaluate its validity and reliability for assessing PSS in Japanese workers. The SPSS-J, including its subscales, SPSS-J (Sufficiency of Positive Aspects [SPA]) and SPSS-J (Minimality of Negative Aspects [MNA]), was developed based on the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS-J). An online survey was conducted with 1,946 participants, followed after two weeks by a test-retest survey with 589 participants. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and convergent validity was evaluated through Pearson's correlations. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined using Cronbach's α coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). CFA confirmed that the two-factor model provided a generally good fit, supporting structural validity. Both SPSS-J (SPA) and SPSS-J (MNA) demonstrated expected correlations with SPOS-J and its subscales, as well as possible antecedents (e.g., job autonomy and strengths-based performance appraisal) and outcomes (e.g., work engagement, organizational affective commitment, and turnover intention). The SPSS-J (SPA) consistently showed stronger correlations than the SPSS-J (MNA). Its internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's α coefficients of .92 for SPSS-J (SPA) and .87 for SPSS-J (MNA). The test-retest reliability was also high, with ICCs of 0.77 and 0.74, respectively. Our study indicates that the SPSS-J is a reliable and valid tool for assessing PSS. The SPSS-J (SPA) may offer a practical alternative as a shortened version, reducing respondent burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":17570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of UOEH","volume":"47 3","pages":"125-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of UOEH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7888/juoeh.47.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceived supervisor support (PSS) is an important factor in employees' health and well-being, and organizational outcomes. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Supervisor Support (SPSS-J) and to evaluate its validity and reliability for assessing PSS in Japanese workers. The SPSS-J, including its subscales, SPSS-J (Sufficiency of Positive Aspects [SPA]) and SPSS-J (Minimality of Negative Aspects [MNA]), was developed based on the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS-J). An online survey was conducted with 1,946 participants, followed after two weeks by a test-retest survey with 589 participants. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and convergent validity was evaluated through Pearson's correlations. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined using Cronbach's α coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). CFA confirmed that the two-factor model provided a generally good fit, supporting structural validity. Both SPSS-J (SPA) and SPSS-J (MNA) demonstrated expected correlations with SPOS-J and its subscales, as well as possible antecedents (e.g., job autonomy and strengths-based performance appraisal) and outcomes (e.g., work engagement, organizational affective commitment, and turnover intention). The SPSS-J (SPA) consistently showed stronger correlations than the SPSS-J (MNA). Its internal consistency was high, with Cronbach's α coefficients of .92 for SPSS-J (SPA) and .87 for SPSS-J (MNA). The test-retest reliability was also high, with ICCs of 0.77 and 0.74, respectively. Our study indicates that the SPSS-J is a reliable and valid tool for assessing PSS. The SPSS-J (SPA) may offer a practical alternative as a shortened version, reducing respondent burden.

日文版主管支持感调查之验证。
感知上司支持(PSS)是影响员工健康和幸福以及组织成果的重要因素。本研究旨在编制日本版的“感知上司支持度调查”(SPSS-J),并评估其在评估日本员工PSS方面的效度和信度。SPSS-J量表,包括其子量表SPSS-J(积极方面充分性[SPA])和SPSS-J(消极方面极小性[MNA]),是在日本版组织支持感知调查(SPSS-J)的基础上开发的。一项有1946名参与者的在线调查在两周后进行了一项有589名参与者的测试-再测试调查。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)评估结构效度,通过Pearson相关评估收敛效度。采用Cronbach’s α系数和类内相关系数(ICCs)确定内部一致性和重测信度。CFA证实,双因素模型总体拟合良好,支持结构效度。SPSS-J (SPA)和SPSS-J (MNA)与SPSS-J及其子量表,以及可能的前因变量(如工作自主性和基于优势的绩效评估)和结果(如工作投入、组织情感承诺和离职倾向)均表现出预期的相关性。SPSS-J (SPA)始终表现出比SPSS-J (MNA)更强的相关性。其内部一致性高,Cronbach’s α系数为。SPSS-J (SPA)和。SPSS-J (MNA)为87。重测信度也较高,ICCs分别为0.77和0.74。我们的研究表明SPSS-J是一个可靠和有效的评估PSS的工具。SPSS-J (SPA)可能作为缩短版提供了一个实用的替代方案,减轻了应答者的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of UOEH
Journal of UOEH Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Published quarterly: 1 annual volume consisted of 4 numbers. Issued on the 1st of March, June, September and December, respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信