Immediate Effects of Wearing Compression and Textured Materials on Plantar Tactile Sensitivity, Balance, and Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Sevim Beyza Olmez, Tugce Coban, Selda Basar
{"title":"Immediate Effects of Wearing Compression and Textured Materials on Plantar Tactile Sensitivity, Balance, and Mobility in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.","authors":"Sevim Beyza Olmez, Tugce Coban, Selda Basar","doi":"10.7547/24-096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that lower-limb stimulation strategies are designed to enhance somatosensory feedback by stimulating the plantar receptors. However, previous studies have focused on only a single sensory stimulation strategy in older adults. Combining two stimulation strategies might produce better results by boosting the sensorimotor signals in older adults. Therefore, the aim of this study was twofold: first, to investigate the effects of the combined use of compression stockings and textured insoles on plantar touch sensitivity, balance, and mobility and to compare these results with each intervention applied separately and with a control intervention; second, to examine whether there was an improvement in plantar touch sensitivity compared with baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed plantar tactile sensitivity, balance, and mobility in 24 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 72.4 ± 6.3 years) under four interventions: 1) compression socks with textured insoles, 2) compression socks with smooth insoles, 3) smooth socks with textured insoles, and 4) smooth socks with smooth insoles (control), all in the standard shoe. The Friedman test or repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each intervention had similar plantar tactile sensitivity, balance, and mobility parameters (P > .05). However, it was determined that only wearing compression socks caused an improvement in plantar tactile sensitivity compared with baseline (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compression socks could be beneficial in increasing somatosensory feedback in older adults, as compression socks increase plantar tactile sensitivity more than textured insoles.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that lower-limb stimulation strategies are designed to enhance somatosensory feedback by stimulating the plantar receptors. However, previous studies have focused on only a single sensory stimulation strategy in older adults. Combining two stimulation strategies might produce better results by boosting the sensorimotor signals in older adults. Therefore, the aim of this study was twofold: first, to investigate the effects of the combined use of compression stockings and textured insoles on plantar touch sensitivity, balance, and mobility and to compare these results with each intervention applied separately and with a control intervention; second, to examine whether there was an improvement in plantar touch sensitivity compared with baseline.

Methods: This study assessed plantar tactile sensitivity, balance, and mobility in 24 community-dwelling older adults (mean age, 72.4 ± 6.3 years) under four interventions: 1) compression socks with textured insoles, 2) compression socks with smooth insoles, 3) smooth socks with textured insoles, and 4) smooth socks with smooth insoles (control), all in the standard shoe. The Friedman test or repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare results.

Results: Each intervention had similar plantar tactile sensitivity, balance, and mobility parameters (P > .05). However, it was determined that only wearing compression socks caused an improvement in plantar tactile sensitivity compared with baseline (P < .05).

Conclusions: Compression socks could be beneficial in increasing somatosensory feedback in older adults, as compression socks increase plantar tactile sensitivity more than textured insoles.

穿着压缩和纹理材料对社区居住老年人足底触觉敏感性、平衡和活动的直接影响。
背景:有证据表明,下肢刺激策略旨在通过刺激足底受体来增强体感反馈。然而,以前的研究只关注老年人的单一感官刺激策略。结合两种刺激策略可能通过增强老年人的感觉运动信号产生更好的结果。因此,本研究的目的是双重的:首先,研究压缩袜和纹理鞋垫联合使用对足底触觉灵敏度、平衡和机动性的影响,并将这些结果与单独应用的每种干预和对照干预进行比较;第二,检查与基线相比足底触摸敏感性是否有改善。方法:本研究评估了24名社区老年人(平均年龄72.4±6.3岁)的足底触觉敏感性、平衡性和活动能力,采用四种干预措施:1)有纹理的压缩袜子,2)光滑的压缩袜子,3)有纹理的光滑袜子,4)有光滑鞋垫的光滑袜子(对照),所有干预措施均穿标准鞋。使用弗里德曼检验或重复测量方差分析来比较结果。结果:各干预组足底触觉敏感性、平衡性和活动参数相似(P < 0.05)。然而,与基线相比,仅穿压缩袜可改善足底触觉灵敏度(P < 0.05)。结论:压缩袜可能有助于增加老年人的体感反馈,因为压缩袜比纹理鞋垫更能增加足底触觉灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信