Comparative Analysis of Rate of Recurrence Using Sodium Hydroxide versus Phenol for Chemical Matrixectomies of Toenails.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Sindhu Srinivas, Jaclyn D Wessinger, Ellianne Nasser, Sarah Strickland, Idorenyin F Udoeyo
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Rate of Recurrence Using Sodium Hydroxide versus Phenol for Chemical Matrixectomies of Toenails.","authors":"Sindhu Srinivas, Jaclyn D Wessinger, Ellianne Nasser, Sarah Strickland, Idorenyin F Udoeyo","doi":"10.7547/23-099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemical matrixectomy using acidic phenol or alkaline sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is indicated when prevention of toenail growth is preferred. The literature reports outcomes for phenol and NaOH independently; however, no studies are found to compare recurrence rates. This study evaluates the efficacy of these chemicals in preventing nail growth recurrence while analyzing whether age, sex, and body mass index contribute to regrowth after chemical matrixectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021, data were obtained for toenail removal procedures that include Current Procedural Terminology codes 11730, 11750, and 11732 and corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code S61.309A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on 138 patients who underwent partial or total chemical matrixectomy. A χ2 test, a Fisher exact test, and an independent two-sample test were used to compare health and demographic characteristics on only patients who underwent a chemical matrixectomy (n = 58), evaluating differences between NaOH and phenol. The mean patient age was 43.2 years. Most patients (72%) did not have a previous revision. Approximately 54% of patients underwent partial nail avulsions without chemical matrixectomies versus 44% who had chemical matrixectomies. No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Comparison of recurrence rates did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between NaOH and phenol. No association was found between nail growth recurrence and age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further investigation into application times, technique, and severity of deformity may provide further insight into factors leading to recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemical matrixectomy using acidic phenol or alkaline sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is indicated when prevention of toenail growth is preferred. The literature reports outcomes for phenol and NaOH independently; however, no studies are found to compare recurrence rates. This study evaluates the efficacy of these chemicals in preventing nail growth recurrence while analyzing whether age, sex, and body mass index contribute to regrowth after chemical matrixectomy.

Methods: From July 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021, data were obtained for toenail removal procedures that include Current Procedural Terminology codes 11730, 11750, and 11732 and corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code S61.309A.

Results: Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on 138 patients who underwent partial or total chemical matrixectomy. A χ2 test, a Fisher exact test, and an independent two-sample test were used to compare health and demographic characteristics on only patients who underwent a chemical matrixectomy (n = 58), evaluating differences between NaOH and phenol. The mean patient age was 43.2 years. Most patients (72%) did not have a previous revision. Approximately 54% of patients underwent partial nail avulsions without chemical matrixectomies versus 44% who had chemical matrixectomies. No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Comparison of recurrence rates did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between NaOH and phenol. No association was found between nail growth recurrence and age.

Conclusion: Further investigation into application times, technique, and severity of deformity may provide further insight into factors leading to recurrence.

氢氧化钠与苯酚用于化学基质趾甲切除术复发率的比较分析。
背景:当希望防止趾甲生长时,建议使用酸性苯酚或碱性氢氧化钠(NaOH)进行化学基质切除术。文献分别报道苯酚和NaOH的结果;然而,没有研究发现比较复发率。本研究评估了这些化学物质在预防指甲生长复发方面的功效,同时分析了年龄、性别和体重指数是否有助于化学基质切除术后的指甲再生。方法:获取2019年7月1日至2021年7月1日趾甲去除手术的数据,包括现行程序术语代码11730、11750和11732以及相应的《国际疾病分类》第十版代码S61.309A。结果:对138例行部分或全部化学基质切除术的患者进行描述性统计分析。采用χ2检验、Fisher精确检验和独立双样本检验比较仅接受化学基质切除术的患者(n = 58)的健康和人口统计学特征,评估NaOH和苯酚之间的差异。患者平均年龄为43.2岁。大多数患者(72%)以前没有翻修过。大约54%的患者在没有化学基质切除术的情况下进行了部分甲撕脱,而44%的患者进行了化学基质切除术。各组间无统计学差异。复发率比较显示NaOH和苯酚之间没有统计学上的显著差异。指甲生长复发与年龄无关联。结论:对应用时间、技术和畸形严重程度的进一步研究可以进一步了解导致复发的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信