Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

IF 22.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Bart J van Essen, Daan C H Ceelen, Wouter Ouwerkerk, Tiew-Hwa K Teng, Ganash N Tharshana, Fook Ming Hew, Javed Butler, Faiez Zannad, Carolyn S Lam, Justin Ezekowitz, Adriaan A Voors, Jasper Tromp
{"title":"Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bart J van Essen, Daan C H Ceelen, Wouter Ouwerkerk, Tiew-Hwa K Teng, Ganash N Tharshana, Fook Ming Hew, Javed Butler, Faiez Zannad, Carolyn S Lam, Justin Ezekowitz, Adriaan A Voors, Jasper Tromp","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2022, our network meta-analysis showed that a combination of β-blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was most effective in reducing all-cause mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study updates the treatment benefit by including additional large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) since 2022, including the Vericiguat Global Study in Participants with Chronic Heart Failure (VICTOR) trial.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare regimens of pharmacotherapy in patients with HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs in patients with HFrEF through April 2025. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality (primary outcome), cardiovascular death, and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (secondary outcomes). Absolute benefits were quantified as life-years gained using BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF cohort data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 103,754 patients across 89 randomized controlled trials. Relative to placebo, quintuple therapy with ARNi, β-blockers, MRA, SGLT2i, and vericiguat most effectively reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.45), followed by quadruple therapy with ARNi, β-blockers, MRA and SGLT2i (0.39, 95% CI: 0.32-0.49). For a representative 70-year-old patient, quadruple therapy (ARNi/β-blockers/MRA/SGLT2i) provided 5.3 additional life-years (95% CI: 2.8-7.7 years) versus no treatment, while quintuple therapy (ARNi/β-blockers/MRA/SGLT2i/vericiguat) provided 6.0 additional life-years (95% CI: 3.7-8.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis reinforces the substantial mortality and morbidity benefit associated with the currently recommended quadruple therapy regimen-angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)-in patients with HFrEF. The addition of vericiguat may provide an incremental survival gain of approximately 0.7 years beyond that achieved with quadruple therapy. However, these results should be regarded as exploratory, as they are derived from a secondary endpoint of a single trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.08.054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2022, our network meta-analysis showed that a combination of β-blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was most effective in reducing all-cause mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study updates the treatment benefit by including additional large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) since 2022, including the Vericiguat Global Study in Participants with Chronic Heart Failure (VICTOR) trial.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare regimens of pharmacotherapy in patients with HFrEF.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs in patients with HFrEF through April 2025. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality (primary outcome), cardiovascular death, and the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (secondary outcomes). Absolute benefits were quantified as life-years gained using BIOSTAT-CHF and ASIAN-HF cohort data.

Results: The analysis included 103,754 patients across 89 randomized controlled trials. Relative to placebo, quintuple therapy with ARNi, β-blockers, MRA, SGLT2i, and vericiguat most effectively reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.45), followed by quadruple therapy with ARNi, β-blockers, MRA and SGLT2i (0.39, 95% CI: 0.32-0.49). For a representative 70-year-old patient, quadruple therapy (ARNi/β-blockers/MRA/SGLT2i) provided 5.3 additional life-years (95% CI: 2.8-7.7 years) versus no treatment, while quintuple therapy (ARNi/β-blockers/MRA/SGLT2i/vericiguat) provided 6.0 additional life-years (95% CI: 3.7-8.4).

Conclusions: This analysis reinforces the substantial mortality and morbidity benefit associated with the currently recommended quadruple therapy regimen-angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi), β-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i)-in patients with HFrEF. The addition of vericiguat may provide an incremental survival gain of approximately 0.7 years beyond that achieved with quadruple therapy. However, these results should be regarded as exploratory, as they are derived from a secondary endpoint of a single trial.

心力衰竭伴射血分数降低的药物治疗:最新的系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:在2022年,我们的网络荟萃分析显示,β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂(ARNi)、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)联合使用在降低心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者的全因死亡率方面最有效。该研究通过纳入自2022年以来的其他大型随机对照试验(rct)来更新治疗益处,包括Vericiguat全球慢性心力衰竭参与者研究(VICTOR)试验。目的:评价和比较HFrEF患者的药物治疗方案。方法:我们在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL检索截至2025年4月的HFrEF患者的随机对照试验。使用频率网络荟萃分析,我们估计了全因死亡率(主要结局)、心血管死亡和心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院(次要结局)的风险比(hr)。使用BIOSTAT-CHF和asia - hf队列数据将绝对获益量化为获得的生命年。结果:该分析包括89项随机对照试验的103,754例患者。与安慰剂相比,ARNi、β受体阻滞剂、MRA、SGLT2i和vericiguat五联疗法最有效地降低了全因死亡率(HR 0.35, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.27-0.45),其次是ARNi、β受体阻滞剂、MRA和SGLT2i四联疗法(0.39,95% CI: 0.32-0.49)。对于一名具有代表性的70岁患者,四联治疗(ARNi/β-阻滞剂/MRA/SGLT2i)与不治疗相比可提供5.3年的额外生命年(95% CI: 2.8-7.7年),而五联治疗(ARNi/β-阻滞剂/MRA/SGLT2i/vericiguat)可提供6.0年的额外生命年(95% CI: 3.7-8.4)。结论:该分析强化了目前推荐的四联治疗方案——血管紧张素受体-neprilysin抑制剂(ARNi)、β受体阻滞剂、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)——对HFrEF患者的死亡率和发病率的显著益处。与四联疗法相比,添加vericiguat可提供约0.7年的增量生存期。然而,这些结果应被视为探索性的,因为它们来自单一试验的次要终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信