Comparison of the clinical effects of reverse digital artery island flap and dorsal branch digital artery island flap on digital tip reconstruction: a single-center retrospective study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Yue Pan, Jun Lei, Jun Yang, Mingwei Dong, Shengjie Jiang, Guangchen Sun, Hui Yu
{"title":"Comparison of the clinical effects of reverse digital artery island flap and dorsal branch digital artery island flap on digital tip reconstruction: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Yue Pan, Jun Lei, Jun Yang, Mingwei Dong, Shengjie Jiang, Guangchen Sun, Hui Yu","doi":"10.2340/jphs.v60.44186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the repairing effects of reverse digital artery island flap and dorsal branch digital artery island flap on fingertip defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2023 to January 2024, analyzed retrospectively clinical data of 41 patients with fingertip defects who underwent two kinds of surgery. There were 24 patients in the reverse digital artery island flap group and 17 patients in the dorsal branch digital artery island flap group. The size of the defect area of the affected finger, the range of motion (ROM) of the interphalangeal joint, the operation time, the hospital stay and the cold tolerance were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between the reverse group and the dorsal branch group in the ROM of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the affected finger. The appearance of the affected finger was significantly better in the reverse group than in the dorsal branch group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the area of defect of affected finger, ROM of distal interphalangeal joint, operation time, hospital stays, function of affected finger and cold tolerance of skin flap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with the dorsal branch digital artery island flap, the reverse digital artery island flap can provide better hand appearance. However, in terms of proximal interphalangeal joint ROM , the effect of dorsal branch digital artery island flap is better than that of reverse digital artery island flap.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"159-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.44186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the repairing effects of reverse digital artery island flap and dorsal branch digital artery island flap on fingertip defects.

Methods: From January 2023 to January 2024, analyzed retrospectively clinical data of 41 patients with fingertip defects who underwent two kinds of surgery. There were 24 patients in the reverse digital artery island flap group and 17 patients in the dorsal branch digital artery island flap group. The size of the defect area of the affected finger, the range of motion (ROM) of the interphalangeal joint, the operation time, the hospital stay and the cold tolerance were evaluated and compared.

Results: There was a significant difference between the reverse group and the dorsal branch group in the ROM of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the affected finger. The appearance of the affected finger was significantly better in the reverse group than in the dorsal branch group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the area of defect of affected finger, ROM of distal interphalangeal joint, operation time, hospital stays, function of affected finger and cold tolerance of skin flap.

Conclusions: Compared with the dorsal branch digital artery island flap, the reverse digital artery island flap can provide better hand appearance. However, in terms of proximal interphalangeal joint ROM , the effect of dorsal branch digital artery island flap is better than that of reverse digital artery island flap.

逆行指动脉岛状皮瓣与背侧支指动脉岛状皮瓣重建指尖的临床效果比较:单中心回顾性研究。
背景:本研究旨在比较指动脉逆行岛状皮瓣与指动脉背支岛状皮瓣修复指端缺损的效果。方法:回顾性分析2023年1月~ 2024年1月对41例手指缺损行两种术式的临床资料。逆行指动脉岛状皮瓣组24例,背支指动脉岛状皮瓣组17例。对患指缺损面积大小、指间关节活动度、手术时间、住院时间和耐寒性进行评价和比较。结果:逆行组与背支组患指近端指间关节活动度差异有统计学意义。逆行组患指外观明显好于背支组。两组患者患指缺损面积、指间关节远端ROM、手术时间、住院时间、患指功能、皮瓣耐寒性差异无统计学意义。结论:与指动脉背支岛状皮瓣相比,逆行指动脉岛状皮瓣能提供更好的手部外观。但在近端指间关节ROM方面,背侧支指动脉岛状皮瓣的效果优于逆行指动脉岛状皮瓣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信