Sterile water or saline solution for inflating the balloon of pediatric catheters.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Isabella Guerrero Hurtado, Valentina CastilloBelalcázar, Mauricio Palacios Gómez
{"title":"Sterile water or saline solution for inflating the balloon of pediatric catheters.","authors":"Isabella Guerrero Hurtado, Valentina CastilloBelalcázar, Mauricio Palacios Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urethral catheterization is a standard clinical procedure, but pediatric data on balloon-related complications remain scarce. Balloon failure during removal may be associated with the type of inflation media and the size of the catheter lumen. Adult findings may not apply to pediatric catheters due to structural differences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the performance of sterile water and 0.9 % saline solution as inflation media in pediatric Foley catheters and evaluate balloon deflation and crystalline deposits under controlled in vitro conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Foley catheters (8Fr, 10Fr, 14Fr, 16Fr) were used. Balloon inflation channels were assessed by cross-sectional area and perimeter. A total of 236 catheters were filled with either sterile water or saline, immersed in artificial urine at 37 °C for 15 days, and later inspected for deflation performance and crystal deposits. Select samples were stained with eosin, toluidine blue, and aniline blue for microscopic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pediatric catheters showed significantly smaller inflation lumens than adult catheters. Balloon integrity was preserved in 99.6 % of cases, with no significant volume loss differences between inflation solutions. However, eosin staining revealed crystalline deposits in two saline-inflated pediatric catheters. No deposits were observed with sterile water or under unstained conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both inflation media performed similarly in short-term use, crystal formation in saline-filled catheters suggests sterile water may be preferable in prolonged pediatric catheterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urethral catheterization is a standard clinical procedure, but pediatric data on balloon-related complications remain scarce. Balloon failure during removal may be associated with the type of inflation media and the size of the catheter lumen. Adult findings may not apply to pediatric catheters due to structural differences.

Objective: To compare the performance of sterile water and 0.9 % saline solution as inflation media in pediatric Foley catheters and evaluate balloon deflation and crystalline deposits under controlled in vitro conditions.

Methods: Foley catheters (8Fr, 10Fr, 14Fr, 16Fr) were used. Balloon inflation channels were assessed by cross-sectional area and perimeter. A total of 236 catheters were filled with either sterile water or saline, immersed in artificial urine at 37 °C for 15 days, and later inspected for deflation performance and crystal deposits. Select samples were stained with eosin, toluidine blue, and aniline blue for microscopic analysis.

Results: Pediatric catheters showed significantly smaller inflation lumens than adult catheters. Balloon integrity was preserved in 99.6 % of cases, with no significant volume loss differences between inflation solutions. However, eosin staining revealed crystalline deposits in two saline-inflated pediatric catheters. No deposits were observed with sterile water or under unstained conditions.

Conclusion: While both inflation media performed similarly in short-term use, crystal formation in saline-filled catheters suggests sterile water may be preferable in prolonged pediatric catheterization.

小儿导管气囊充气用无菌水或生理盐水。
背景:导尿是一种标准的临床手术,但关于球囊相关并发症的儿科数据仍然很少。在移除过程中球囊失败可能与充气介质的类型和导管管腔的大小有关。由于结构上的差异,成人的发现可能不适用于儿科导管。目的:比较无菌水和0.9%生理盐水作为儿科Foley导管充气介质的性能,并在体外控制条件下评价气囊充气和结晶沉积。方法:采用Foley导管(8Fr, 10Fr, 14Fr, 16Fr)。通过横截面积和周长评估气球膨胀通道。236根导管分别充入无菌水或生理盐水,在37℃的人工尿液中浸泡15天,随后检查放气性能和结晶沉积。选择的样品用伊红、甲苯胺蓝和苯胺蓝染色进行显微分析。结果:儿童导管的膨胀腔明显小于成人导管。在99.6%的病例中球囊完整性得以保存,不同的充气方案没有明显的体积损失差异。然而,伊红染色显示结晶沉积在两个盐水膨胀的儿科导管。无菌水或未染色条件下未观察到沉积物。结论:虽然两种膨胀介质在短期使用中表现相似,但在充满盐的导管中形成的晶体表明,无菌水可能是长期儿科导管的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信