Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in Patients With Cirrhosis and Its Association With Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Morgan Thomas, Cameron Lanier, Kelly Covert
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitor Use in Patients With Cirrhosis and Its Association With Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.","authors":"Morgan Thomas, Cameron Lanier, Kelly Covert","doi":"10.1177/87551225251364516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) being a serious complication. Established SBP risk factors include gastrointestinal bleeding and low ascitic protein, but the role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains unclear. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated the impact of PPI use on primary SBP development in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Additional objectives included reviewing PPI prescribing patterns and associated clinical outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> An institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review was conducted on adults (≥18 years) with cirrhosis admitted for presumed SBP between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, incarceration, and recent or current upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were grouped by PPI exposure, defined as PPI use prior to admission. The primary outcome was SBP incidence; secondary outcomes included mortality and hepatic decompensation events. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-one patients were included: 42 reported home PPI therapy, and 39 did not. SBP incidence was 33.3% in the PPI group versus 20.5% in the no PPI group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.249, <i>P</i> = 0.618). Worsening ascites occurred in 99%, encephalopathy in 42%, varices in 11%, and suspected hepatorenal syndrome in 21%. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%. PPI indications were often undocumented. <b>Conclusion and Relevance:</b> Although no significant association was found between home PPI use and SBP, frequent undocumented use and potential overuse of PPIs underscore the need for targeted intervention. Pharmacists are well-positioned to lead stewardship efforts by reviewing indications and minimizing unnecessary therapy to enhance safety and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":" ","pages":"87551225251364516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225251364516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cirrhosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) being a serious complication. Established SBP risk factors include gastrointestinal bleeding and low ascitic protein, but the role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remains unclear. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of PPI use on primary SBP development in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Additional objectives included reviewing PPI prescribing patterns and associated clinical outcomes. Methods: An institutional review board-approved, retrospective chart review was conducted on adults (≥18 years) with cirrhosis admitted for presumed SBP between June 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, incarceration, and recent or current upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were grouped by PPI exposure, defined as PPI use prior to admission. The primary outcome was SBP incidence; secondary outcomes included mortality and hepatic decompensation events. Results: Eighty-one patients were included: 42 reported home PPI therapy, and 39 did not. SBP incidence was 33.3% in the PPI group versus 20.5% in the no PPI group (χ2 = 0.249, P = 0.618). Worsening ascites occurred in 99%, encephalopathy in 42%, varices in 11%, and suspected hepatorenal syndrome in 21%. In-hospital mortality was 9.9%. PPI indications were often undocumented. Conclusion and Relevance: Although no significant association was found between home PPI use and SBP, frequent undocumented use and potential overuse of PPIs underscore the need for targeted intervention. Pharmacists are well-positioned to lead stewardship efforts by reviewing indications and minimizing unnecessary therapy to enhance safety and outcomes.

肝硬化患者使用质子泵抑制剂及其与自发性细菌性腹膜炎的关系。
背景:肝硬化是美国发病率和死亡率的主要原因,自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是一种严重的并发症。已知的收缩压危险因素包括胃肠道出血和腹水蛋白水平低,但质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的作用尚不清楚。目的:本研究评估PPI使用对肝硬化住院患者原发性收缩压发展的影响。其他目标包括回顾PPI处方模式和相关临床结果。方法:对2022年6月1日至2024年6月30日期间因推测收缩压而入院的肝硬化成人(≥18岁)进行了机构审查委员会批准的回顾性图表审查。排除标准包括妊娠、嵌顿、近期或当前上消化道出血。患者按PPI暴露分组,定义为入院前使用PPI。主要观察指标为收缩压发生率;次要结局包括死亡率和肝脏失代偿事件。结果:纳入81例患者:42例报告家庭PPI治疗,39例未报告家庭PPI治疗。PPI组的收缩压发生率为33.3%,未使用PPI组为20.5% (χ2 = 0.249, P = 0.618)。腹水恶化发生率为99%,脑病发生率为42%,静脉曲张发生率为11%,疑似肝肾综合征发生率为21%。住院死亡率为9.9%。PPI适应症通常没有记录。结论和相关性:虽然没有发现家庭PPI使用与收缩压之间的显著关联,但频繁的无证使用和潜在的PPI过度使用强调了有针对性干预的必要性。药剂师有能力通过审查适应症和尽量减少不必要的治疗来提高安全性和疗效,从而领导管理工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信