Machine Learning for Personalized Prediction of Electrocardiogram (EKG) Use in Emergency Care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hairong Wang, Xingyu Zhang
{"title":"Machine Learning for Personalized Prediction of Electrocardiogram (EKG) Use in Emergency Care.","authors":"Hairong Wang, Xingyu Zhang","doi":"10.3390/jpm15080358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Electrocardiograms (EKGs) are essential tools in emergency medicine, often used to evaluate chest pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms suggestive of cardiac dysfunction. Yet, EKGs are not universally administered to all emergency department (ED) patients. Understanding and predicting which patients receive an EKG may offer insights into clinical decision making, resource allocation, and potential disparities in care. This study examines whether integrating structured clinical data with free-text patient narratives can improve prediction of EKG utilization in the ED. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective observational study to predict electrocardiogram (EKG) utilization using data from 13,115 adult emergency department (ED) visits in the nationally representative 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey-Emergency Department (NHAMCS-ED), leveraging both structured features-demographics, vital signs, comorbidities, arrival mode, and triage acuity, with the most influential selected via Lasso regression-and unstructured patient narratives transformed into numerical embeddings using Clinical-BERT. Four supervised learning models-Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB)-were trained on three inputs (structured data only, text embeddings only, and a late-fusion combined model); hyperparameters were optimized by grid search with 5-fold cross-validation; performance was evaluated via AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision; and interpretability was assessed using SHAP values and Permutation Feature Importance. <b>Results</b>: EKGs were administered in 30.6% of adult ED visits. Patients who received EKGs were more likely to be older, White, Medicare-insured, and to present with abnormal vital signs or higher triage severity. Across all models, the combined data approach yielded superior predictive performance. The SVM and LR achieved the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.860 and 0.861) when using both structured and unstructured data, compared to 0.772 with structured data alone and 0.823 and 0.822 with unstructured data alone. Similar improvements were observed in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. <b>Conclusions</b>: Integrating structured clinical data with patient narratives significantly enhances the ability to predict EKG utilization in the emergency department. These findings support a personalized medicine framework by demonstrating how multimodal data integration can enable individualized, real-time decision support in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiograms (EKGs) are essential tools in emergency medicine, often used to evaluate chest pain, dyspnea, and other symptoms suggestive of cardiac dysfunction. Yet, EKGs are not universally administered to all emergency department (ED) patients. Understanding and predicting which patients receive an EKG may offer insights into clinical decision making, resource allocation, and potential disparities in care. This study examines whether integrating structured clinical data with free-text patient narratives can improve prediction of EKG utilization in the ED. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study to predict electrocardiogram (EKG) utilization using data from 13,115 adult emergency department (ED) visits in the nationally representative 2021 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey-Emergency Department (NHAMCS-ED), leveraging both structured features-demographics, vital signs, comorbidities, arrival mode, and triage acuity, with the most influential selected via Lasso regression-and unstructured patient narratives transformed into numerical embeddings using Clinical-BERT. Four supervised learning models-Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB)-were trained on three inputs (structured data only, text embeddings only, and a late-fusion combined model); hyperparameters were optimized by grid search with 5-fold cross-validation; performance was evaluated via AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and precision; and interpretability was assessed using SHAP values and Permutation Feature Importance. Results: EKGs were administered in 30.6% of adult ED visits. Patients who received EKGs were more likely to be older, White, Medicare-insured, and to present with abnormal vital signs or higher triage severity. Across all models, the combined data approach yielded superior predictive performance. The SVM and LR achieved the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.860 and 0.861) when using both structured and unstructured data, compared to 0.772 with structured data alone and 0.823 and 0.822 with unstructured data alone. Similar improvements were observed in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Conclusions: Integrating structured clinical data with patient narratives significantly enhances the ability to predict EKG utilization in the emergency department. These findings support a personalized medicine framework by demonstrating how multimodal data integration can enable individualized, real-time decision support in the ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机器学习在紧急护理中用于心电图(EKG)的个性化预测。
背景:心电图(EKGs)是急诊医学中必不可少的工具,常用于评估胸痛、呼吸困难和其他提示心功能障碍的症状。然而,并不是所有的急诊科(ED)患者都普遍使用心电图。了解和预测哪些患者接受心电图检查可以为临床决策、资源分配和潜在的护理差异提供见解。本研究探讨了将结构化临床数据与自由文本患者叙述相结合是否可以提高对急诊科心电图使用情况的预测。我们进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,利用具有全国代表性的2021年国家医院门诊医疗调查-急诊科(NHAMCS-ED)中13,115名成人急诊科(ED)就诊的数据,利用结构化特征-人口统计学、生命体征、合并症、到达模式和分诊灵敏度,预测心电图(EKG)的利用率。最具影响力的选择通过拉索回归和非结构化的病人叙述转化为数字嵌入使用临床bert。四种监督学习模型-逻辑回归(LR),支持向量机(SVM),随机森林(RF)和极端梯度增强(XGB)-在三个输入(仅结构化数据,仅文本嵌入和后期融合组合模型)上进行训练;采用网格搜索优化超参数,并进行5次交叉验证;通过AUROC、准确度、灵敏度、特异度和精密度评价;使用SHAP值和排列特征重要性评估可解释性。结果:30.6%的成人急诊科患者接受了心电图检查。接受心电图检查的患者更有可能是老年人、白人、有医疗保险的人,并且表现出异常的生命体征或更高的分诊严重程度。在所有模型中,组合数据方法产生了优越的预测性能。同时使用结构化和非结构化数据时,SVM和LR的ROC曲线下面积最大,AUC分别为0.860和0.861,而单独使用结构化数据时,SVM和LR的AUC分别为0.772,单独使用非结构化数据时,SVM和LR的AUC分别为0.823和0.822。在准确性、敏感性和特异性方面也观察到类似的改善。结论:将结构化临床数据与患者叙述相结合可显著提高预测急诊科心电图使用情况的能力。这些发现通过展示多模式数据集成如何在急诊科实现个性化、实时决策支持来支持个性化医疗框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信