Lymph Node Mapping in Gallbladder Cancers: Analysis to Assess the Impact of Location and Number of Lymph Nodal Stations.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Abhay K Kattepur, Swapnil Patel, Shraddha Patkar, Mufaddal Kazi, Mahesh Goel
{"title":"Lymph Node Mapping in Gallbladder Cancers: Analysis to Assess the Impact of Location and Number of Lymph Nodal Stations.","authors":"Abhay K Kattepur, Swapnil Patel, Shraddha Patkar, Mufaddal Kazi, Mahesh Goel","doi":"10.1002/jso.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The current staging for gallbladder cancer (GBC) considers only the number of metastatic lymph nodes without addressing their location. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of lymph node mapping (both number and location) in node positive GBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively maintained operative database of operated GBC patients from April 2010 to March 2022 with positive lymph nodes was analyzed. Nodal burden was assessed by the number and meticulous mapping of the involved nodal stations. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. A new nodal staging system was formulated and compared with the current American Joint Committee for Cancer Care (AJCC) staging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>222 node positive patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed that multi-station involvement was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.522 [95% CI: 0.354-0.770]; p = 0.001). The 5-year DFS of 42.9%, 35.5%, 17% and 13% (p = 0.023) respectively was observed for positive cystic node (N1a), single positive non-cystic node (N1b), 2 and 3 positive nodes (N2a and N2b) with multi-station involvement. The Concordance index for the new staging system was 0.588 reflecting a 6.9% absolute improvement in the prediction capability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Station-based nodal assessment predicted for survival in our node positive cohort. Pathological assessment of involved stations, in addition to the number of involved nodes, could potentially provide superior prognostic information. However, this needs to be evaluated prospectively in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The current staging for gallbladder cancer (GBC) considers only the number of metastatic lymph nodes without addressing their location. This study evaluates the prognostic impact of lymph node mapping (both number and location) in node positive GBC.

Methods: Prospectively maintained operative database of operated GBC patients from April 2010 to March 2022 with positive lymph nodes was analyzed. Nodal burden was assessed by the number and meticulous mapping of the involved nodal stations. Outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. A new nodal staging system was formulated and compared with the current American Joint Committee for Cancer Care (AJCC) staging.

Results: 222 node positive patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed that multi-station involvement was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.522 [95% CI: 0.354-0.770]; p = 0.001). The 5-year DFS of 42.9%, 35.5%, 17% and 13% (p = 0.023) respectively was observed for positive cystic node (N1a), single positive non-cystic node (N1b), 2 and 3 positive nodes (N2a and N2b) with multi-station involvement. The Concordance index for the new staging system was 0.588 reflecting a 6.9% absolute improvement in the prediction capability.

Conclusions: Station-based nodal assessment predicted for survival in our node positive cohort. Pathological assessment of involved stations, in addition to the number of involved nodes, could potentially provide superior prognostic information. However, this needs to be evaluated prospectively in larger cohorts.

胆囊癌淋巴结定位:分析评估淋巴结位置和数量的影响。
背景和目的:目前胆囊癌(GBC)的分期只考虑转移淋巴结的数量而不考虑其位置。本研究评估淋巴结定位(数量和位置)对淋巴结阳性GBC的预后影响。方法:对2010年4月至2022年3月淋巴结阳性的GBC手术患者的前瞻性手术数据库进行分析。通过所涉及的节点站的数量和细致的绘图来评估节点负担。采用Cox回归分析评价结果。我们制定了一个新的淋巴结分期系统,并与目前的美国癌症护理联合委员会(AJCC)分期进行了比较。结果:共纳入222例淋巴结阳性患者。多因素分析显示,多站介入与较差的无病生存(DFS)显著相关(风险比[HR]: 0.522 [95% CI: 0.354-0.770]; p = 0.001)。阳性囊性结(N1a)、单一阳性非囊性结(N1b)、2个和3个阳性淋巴结(N2a和N2b)多站累及的5年DFS分别为42.9%、35.5%、17%和13% (p = 0.023)。新分期系统的一致性指数为0.588,预测能力绝对提高6.9%。结论:基于站点的淋巴结评估预测了我们的淋巴结阳性队列的生存。除了受累淋巴结的数量外,对受累淋巴结的病理评估可能提供更好的预后信息。然而,这需要在更大的队列中进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信