Comparing Tolerability and Toxicity of Calaspargase-Pegol and Pegaspargase in Pediatric Leukemia Patients.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Jinjoo Kang, Srivarshini Kanukollu, Angelica Bevinetto, Rosamarie Corless, Arlene Redner
{"title":"Comparing Tolerability and Toxicity of Calaspargase-Pegol and Pegaspargase in Pediatric Leukemia Patients.","authors":"Jinjoo Kang, Srivarshini Kanukollu, Angelica Bevinetto, Rosamarie Corless, Arlene Redner","doi":"10.1097/MPH.0000000000003098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As of December 2022, calaspargase-pegol is the standard long-acting asparaginase formulation for patients younger than 22 years of age with acute leukemia. This 3-year retrospective evaluation compared real-world safety and efficacy of calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase in pediatric patients. Incidence and severity of hypersensitivity reactions, silent inactivation, and common asparaginase-associated adverse effects were collected. A total of 103 patients were included, of whom 50 received calaspargase-pegol and 58 received pegaspargase. Similar rates of symptomatic hypersensitivity reactions (20% vs. 10.3%; P=0.16) and silent inactivation (16% vs. 5.2%; P=0.18) were seen with calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase, respectively. However, 13 patients in the calaspargase-pegol group required conversion to short-acting asparaginase compared with 6 patients in the pegaspargase group (26% vs. 10.3%; P=0.03). Most adverse effects were comparable between the 2 groups, except for a lower rate of hyperbilirubinemia with calaspargase-pegol compared with pegaspargase (34% vs. 58.6%; P=0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between the formulations in terms of rate of hypersensitivity reactions and silent inactivation. However, calaspargase-pegol did require more conversions to short-acting asparaginase therapy. Additional monitoring and preventative measures should be utilized to prevent calaspargase-pegol-associated adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000003098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As of December 2022, calaspargase-pegol is the standard long-acting asparaginase formulation for patients younger than 22 years of age with acute leukemia. This 3-year retrospective evaluation compared real-world safety and efficacy of calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase in pediatric patients. Incidence and severity of hypersensitivity reactions, silent inactivation, and common asparaginase-associated adverse effects were collected. A total of 103 patients were included, of whom 50 received calaspargase-pegol and 58 received pegaspargase. Similar rates of symptomatic hypersensitivity reactions (20% vs. 10.3%; P=0.16) and silent inactivation (16% vs. 5.2%; P=0.18) were seen with calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase, respectively. However, 13 patients in the calaspargase-pegol group required conversion to short-acting asparaginase compared with 6 patients in the pegaspargase group (26% vs. 10.3%; P=0.03). Most adverse effects were comparable between the 2 groups, except for a lower rate of hyperbilirubinemia with calaspargase-pegol compared with pegaspargase (34% vs. 58.6%; P=0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between the formulations in terms of rate of hypersensitivity reactions and silent inactivation. However, calaspargase-pegol did require more conversions to short-acting asparaginase therapy. Additional monitoring and preventative measures should be utilized to prevent calaspargase-pegol-associated adverse effects.

比较天冬氨酸- pegol和天冬氨酸酶治疗儿童白血病的耐受性和毒性。
截至2022年12月,calaspargas -pegol是22岁以下急性白血病患者的标准长效天冬酰胺酶制剂。这项为期3年的回顾性评估比较了calaspargas -pegol与pegaspargase在儿科患者中的实际安全性和有效性。收集过敏反应的发生率和严重程度、无症状失活和常见的天冬酰胺酶相关不良反应。共纳入103例患者,其中50例接受calaspargas -pegol治疗,58例接受pegaspargase治疗。calaspargas -pegol与pegaspargase的症状性超敏反应发生率相似(20% vs. 10.3%, P=0.16)和无症状失活(16% vs. 5.2%, P=0.18)。然而,calaspargas -pegol组有13例患者需要转换为短效天冬酰胺酶,而pegaspargase组有6例患者需要转换为短效天冬酰胺酶(26% vs. 10.3%; P=0.03)。除了与pegaspargase相比,calaspargas -pegol组高胆红素血症发生率较低(34% vs. 58.6%; P=0.01),两组间大多数不良反应具有可比性。总体而言,在过敏反应和沉默失活率方面,配方之间没有发现显着差异。然而,calaspargas -pegol确实需要更多的转换到短效天冬酰胺酶治疗。应采用额外的监测和预防措施,以防止与calaspargas - pegols相关的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
415
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JPHO) reports on major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and blood diseases in children. The journal publishes original research, commentaries, historical insights, and clinical and laboratory observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信