{"title":"Comparing Tolerability and Toxicity of Calaspargase-Pegol and Pegaspargase in Pediatric Leukemia Patients.","authors":"Jinjoo Kang, Srivarshini Kanukollu, Angelica Bevinetto, Rosamarie Corless, Arlene Redner","doi":"10.1097/MPH.0000000000003098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As of December 2022, calaspargase-pegol is the standard long-acting asparaginase formulation for patients younger than 22 years of age with acute leukemia. This 3-year retrospective evaluation compared real-world safety and efficacy of calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase in pediatric patients. Incidence and severity of hypersensitivity reactions, silent inactivation, and common asparaginase-associated adverse effects were collected. A total of 103 patients were included, of whom 50 received calaspargase-pegol and 58 received pegaspargase. Similar rates of symptomatic hypersensitivity reactions (20% vs. 10.3%; P=0.16) and silent inactivation (16% vs. 5.2%; P=0.18) were seen with calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase, respectively. However, 13 patients in the calaspargase-pegol group required conversion to short-acting asparaginase compared with 6 patients in the pegaspargase group (26% vs. 10.3%; P=0.03). Most adverse effects were comparable between the 2 groups, except for a lower rate of hyperbilirubinemia with calaspargase-pegol compared with pegaspargase (34% vs. 58.6%; P=0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between the formulations in terms of rate of hypersensitivity reactions and silent inactivation. However, calaspargase-pegol did require more conversions to short-acting asparaginase therapy. Additional monitoring and preventative measures should be utilized to prevent calaspargase-pegol-associated adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPH.0000000000003098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As of December 2022, calaspargase-pegol is the standard long-acting asparaginase formulation for patients younger than 22 years of age with acute leukemia. This 3-year retrospective evaluation compared real-world safety and efficacy of calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase in pediatric patients. Incidence and severity of hypersensitivity reactions, silent inactivation, and common asparaginase-associated adverse effects were collected. A total of 103 patients were included, of whom 50 received calaspargase-pegol and 58 received pegaspargase. Similar rates of symptomatic hypersensitivity reactions (20% vs. 10.3%; P=0.16) and silent inactivation (16% vs. 5.2%; P=0.18) were seen with calaspargase-pegol versus pegaspargase, respectively. However, 13 patients in the calaspargase-pegol group required conversion to short-acting asparaginase compared with 6 patients in the pegaspargase group (26% vs. 10.3%; P=0.03). Most adverse effects were comparable between the 2 groups, except for a lower rate of hyperbilirubinemia with calaspargase-pegol compared with pegaspargase (34% vs. 58.6%; P=0.01). Overall, no significant differences were found between the formulations in terms of rate of hypersensitivity reactions and silent inactivation. However, calaspargase-pegol did require more conversions to short-acting asparaginase therapy. Additional monitoring and preventative measures should be utilized to prevent calaspargase-pegol-associated adverse effects.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JPHO) reports on major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and blood diseases in children. The journal publishes original research, commentaries, historical insights, and clinical and laboratory observations.