Blood Biomarkers as Optimization Tools for Computed Tomography in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Management in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ángela Caballero Ballesteros, María Isabel Alonso Gallardo, Juan Mora-Delgado
{"title":"Blood Biomarkers as Optimization Tools for Computed Tomography in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Management in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ángela Caballero Ballesteros, María Isabel Alonso Gallardo, Juan Mora-Delgado","doi":"10.3390/jpm15080350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially mild TBI (mTBI), is frequently caused by traffic accidents, falls, or sports injuries. Although computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for diagnosis, overuse can lead to unnecessary radiation exposure, increased healthcare costs, and emergency department saturation. Blood-based biomarkers have emerged as potential tools to optimize CT scan use. This systematic review aims to evaluate recent evidence on the role of specific blood biomarkers in guiding CT decisions in patients with mTBI. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases for studies published between 2020 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on adult patients with mTBI evaluated using both CT imaging and at least one of the following biomarkers: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B). After screening, six studies were included in the final review. <b>Results</b>: All included studies reported high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the selected biomarkers in detecting clinically relevant intracranial lesions. GFAP and UCH-L1, particularly in combination, consistently identified low-risk patients who could potentially forgo CT scans. While S100B also showed high sensitivity, discrepancies in cutoff values across studies highlighted the need for harmonization. <b>Conclusions</b>: Blood biomarkers such as GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B demonstrate strong potential to reduce unnecessary CT imaging in mTBI by identifying patients at low risk of significant brain injury. Future research should focus on standardizing biomarker thresholds and validating protocols to support their integration into clinical practice guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12387816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially mild TBI (mTBI), is frequently caused by traffic accidents, falls, or sports injuries. Although computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for diagnosis, overuse can lead to unnecessary radiation exposure, increased healthcare costs, and emergency department saturation. Blood-based biomarkers have emerged as potential tools to optimize CT scan use. This systematic review aims to evaluate recent evidence on the role of specific blood biomarkers in guiding CT decisions in patients with mTBI. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases for studies published between 2020 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on adult patients with mTBI evaluated using both CT imaging and at least one of the following biomarkers: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B). After screening, six studies were included in the final review. Results: All included studies reported high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the selected biomarkers in detecting clinically relevant intracranial lesions. GFAP and UCH-L1, particularly in combination, consistently identified low-risk patients who could potentially forgo CT scans. While S100B also showed high sensitivity, discrepancies in cutoff values across studies highlighted the need for harmonization. Conclusions: Blood biomarkers such as GFAP, UCH-L1, and S100B demonstrate strong potential to reduce unnecessary CT imaging in mTBI by identifying patients at low risk of significant brain injury. Future research should focus on standardizing biomarker thresholds and validating protocols to support their integration into clinical practice guidelines.

Abstract Image

血液生物标志物作为计算机断层扫描在急诊科轻度创伤性脑损伤管理中的优化工具:系统综述。
背景/目的:外伤性脑损伤(TBI),尤其是轻度TBI (mTBI),通常由交通事故、跌倒或运动损伤引起。尽管计算机断层扫描(CT)是诊断的黄金标准,但过度使用可能导致不必要的辐射暴露,增加医疗保健成本,并导致急诊科饱和。基于血液的生物标志物已经成为优化CT扫描使用的潜在工具。本系统综述旨在评估特定血液生物标志物在指导mTBI患者CT决策中的作用的最新证据。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane和CINAHL数据库,检索2020年至2024年间发表的研究。纳入标准集中于成年mTBI患者,使用CT成像和至少一项以下生物标志物进行评估:胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、泛素羧基末端水解酶L1 (UCH-L1)和S100钙结合蛋白B (S100B)。筛选后,6项研究被纳入最终综述。结果:所有纳入的研究都报告了所选生物标志物在检测临床相关颅内病变方面的高敏感性和阴性预测值。GFAP和UCH-L1,特别是联合使用,一致地识别出可能放弃CT扫描的低风险患者。虽然S100B也显示出高灵敏度,但各研究中截止值的差异突出了协调的必要性。结论:血液生物标志物,如GFAP、UCH-L1和S100B,通过识别低风险的显著脑损伤患者,显示出减少mTBI中不必要的CT成像的强大潜力。未来的研究应侧重于标准化生物标志物阈值和验证方案,以支持其纳入临床实践指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信