Evaluating United States Air Force hearing conservation educational materials for compliance, readability, understandability, and actionability.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Thomas Dominguez, Lucas Pettit, Clayton Garner, Dirk P Yamamoto, James A VanDerslice, Rodney G Handy, Lisa H Gren, Darrah K Sleeth
{"title":"Evaluating United States Air Force hearing conservation educational materials for compliance, readability, understandability, and actionability.","authors":"Thomas Dominguez, Lucas Pettit, Clayton Garner, Dirk P Yamamoto, James A VanDerslice, Rodney G Handy, Lisa H Gren, Darrah K Sleeth","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2025.2529983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus are two of the most prevalent service-connected disabilities of United States military veterans. Educational materials meant for hearing conservation program-eligible Airmen were evaluated from active-duty, continental United States (CONUS) Air Force bases for compliance with US Air Force (USAF), Department of Defense (DoD), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Understandability and actionability were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), while readability was assessed with Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Educational materials were received from 44 of 61 (72%) active-duty, CONUS bases, with 27 bases sending one item and 17 bases sending multiple items, for a total of 67 educational materials, which were evaluated by three evaluators. Educational materials were categorized into one of four types: (A) supervisor's guide to hearing conservation (<i>n</i> = 21); (B) new worker hearing conservation training (<i>n</i> = 20); (C) two-page hearing conservation program training pamphlet (<i>n</i> = 14); and (D) other (<i>n</i> = 12). Overall mean compliance was 84% (CI: 63,100) (USAF), 83% (CI: 62,100) (DoD), and 88% (CI: 67,100) (OSHA), respectively. Overall mean understandability was 75% (CI: 63,87) and actionability was 89% (67,100). There was good agreement between the three evaluators for each of the criteria (87-90%). Overall mean readability was grade level 10.68 ± 1.68 on the FKGL scale. For educational materials, 65 of the 67 (97%) were above the recommended 6th-grade reading level, and 62 of the 67 (93%) educational materials were above the average American 8th-grade reading level. This study established compliance, understandability, actionability, and readability scores for educational materials that military service members receive upon entry into the hearing conservation program, gathered from active-duty, CONUS Air Force bases. Using the determined scores, recommendations, such as providing active feedback and condensing information, were given to improve future hearing conservation educational materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2025.2529983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus are two of the most prevalent service-connected disabilities of United States military veterans. Educational materials meant for hearing conservation program-eligible Airmen were evaluated from active-duty, continental United States (CONUS) Air Force bases for compliance with US Air Force (USAF), Department of Defense (DoD), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations. Understandability and actionability were assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), while readability was assessed with Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Educational materials were received from 44 of 61 (72%) active-duty, CONUS bases, with 27 bases sending one item and 17 bases sending multiple items, for a total of 67 educational materials, which were evaluated by three evaluators. Educational materials were categorized into one of four types: (A) supervisor's guide to hearing conservation (n = 21); (B) new worker hearing conservation training (n = 20); (C) two-page hearing conservation program training pamphlet (n = 14); and (D) other (n = 12). Overall mean compliance was 84% (CI: 63,100) (USAF), 83% (CI: 62,100) (DoD), and 88% (CI: 67,100) (OSHA), respectively. Overall mean understandability was 75% (CI: 63,87) and actionability was 89% (67,100). There was good agreement between the three evaluators for each of the criteria (87-90%). Overall mean readability was grade level 10.68 ± 1.68 on the FKGL scale. For educational materials, 65 of the 67 (97%) were above the recommended 6th-grade reading level, and 62 of the 67 (93%) educational materials were above the average American 8th-grade reading level. This study established compliance, understandability, actionability, and readability scores for educational materials that military service members receive upon entry into the hearing conservation program, gathered from active-duty, CONUS Air Force bases. Using the determined scores, recommendations, such as providing active feedback and condensing information, were given to improve future hearing conservation educational materials.

评估美国空军听力保护教材的合规性、可读性、可理解性和可操作性。
噪音引起的听力损失和耳鸣是美国退伍军人中最常见的两种与服务有关的残疾。针对符合听力保护计划资格的飞行员的教育材料,从现役美国大陆空军基地进行评估,以符合美国空军(USAF),国防部(DoD)和职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的规定。可理解性和可操作性采用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V)进行评估,可读性采用Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)进行评估。61个现役美军基地中有44个(72%)收到了教育材料,其中27个基地收到了一个项目,17个基地收到了多个项目,总共67份教育材料,由3名评估人员进行评估。教材分为四类:(A)听力保护指导手册(21份);(B)新工人听力保护培训(n = 20);(C)两页听力保护计划培训小册子(n = 14);(D)其他(n = 12)。总体平均依从性分别为84% (CI: 63,100) (USAF), 83% (CI: 62,100) (DoD)和88% (CI: 67,100) (OSHA)。总体平均可理解性为75% (CI: 63,87),可操作性为89%(67,100)。三个评估者对每个标准有很好的一致性(87-90%)。总体平均可读性在FKGL量表上为10.68±1.68级。在教材方面,67本教材中有65本(97%)高于推荐的六年级阅读水平,67本教材中有62本(93%)高于美国八年级的平均阅读水平。本研究建立了服兵役人员在参加听力保护计划时收到的教育材料的依从性、可理解性、可操作性和可读性分数,这些材料来自现役的美国空军基地。根据确定的分数,提出了积极反馈和压缩信息等建议,以改进未来的听力保护教材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ( JOEH ) is a joint publication of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA®) and ACGIH®. The JOEH is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to enhancing the knowledge and practice of occupational and environmental hygiene and safety by widely disseminating research articles and applied studies of the highest quality. The JOEH provides a written medium for the communication of ideas, methods, processes, and research in core and emerging areas of occupational and environmental hygiene. Core domains include, but are not limited to: exposure assessment, control strategies, ergonomics, and risk analysis. Emerging domains include, but are not limited to: sensor technology, emergency preparedness and response, changing workforce, and management and analysis of "big" data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信