Antibiotic prophylaxis for neonatal surgery: Evaluation of the implementation of a new protocol based on "less could be better".

IF 0.9 Q2 Medicine
M José Sánchez de Toro, Mercedes Sampedro Martín, Celia Permuy Romero, Laura Sánchez García, Cristina Calvo, Teresa Del Rosal, Adelina Pellicer
{"title":"Antibiotic prophylaxis for neonatal surgery: Evaluation of the implementation of a new protocol based on \"less could be better\".","authors":"M José Sánchez de Toro, Mercedes Sampedro Martín, Celia Permuy Romero, Laura Sánchez García, Cristina Calvo, Teresa Del Rosal, Adelina Pellicer","doi":"10.1177/19345798251374926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionSurgical site infections are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as prolonged hospitalization and higher costs. Neonates have an immature immune system, rendering them a susceptible population. Evidence regarding surgical prophylaxis in this age group is limited, which has led us to employ broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy for an extended duration.ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of a new neonatal surgical prophylaxis protocol, based on available evidence in pediatric and adult populations, aimed at restricting antibiotic prescription to this indication and for a limited period of time.Materials and MethodsA case (intervention group receiving the new protocol from March 2022 to March 2023) and a control (historical cohort from March 2019 to March 2020 that received the existing prophylaxis at that time) study was conducted. Perinatal and surgical variables, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, adherence to the protocol and infectious complications were analyzed.ResultsA total of 90 procedures from the intervention group and 116 from the control group were analyzed, with comparable characteristics. The protocol change resulted in a reduction in the duration of antibiotic therapy and a decrease in the cumulative dose (72 h vs 48 h, p < 0.001) without an increase in infectious complications (6.4% vs 10.1%, p = 0.343).ConclusionsThe use of a surgical prophylaxis protocol with a narrower spectrum and shorter duration does not increase the incidence of surgery-related infections in neonatal patients. Despite the multidisciplinary nature of the professionals caring for these patients, the development and implementation of this new protocol have been feasible in our setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16537,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","volume":" ","pages":"19345798251374926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19345798251374926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionSurgical site infections are associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, as well as prolonged hospitalization and higher costs. Neonates have an immature immune system, rendering them a susceptible population. Evidence regarding surgical prophylaxis in this age group is limited, which has led us to employ broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy for an extended duration.ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of a new neonatal surgical prophylaxis protocol, based on available evidence in pediatric and adult populations, aimed at restricting antibiotic prescription to this indication and for a limited period of time.Materials and MethodsA case (intervention group receiving the new protocol from March 2022 to March 2023) and a control (historical cohort from March 2019 to March 2020 that received the existing prophylaxis at that time) study was conducted. Perinatal and surgical variables, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, adherence to the protocol and infectious complications were analyzed.ResultsA total of 90 procedures from the intervention group and 116 from the control group were analyzed, with comparable characteristics. The protocol change resulted in a reduction in the duration of antibiotic therapy and a decrease in the cumulative dose (72 h vs 48 h, p < 0.001) without an increase in infectious complications (6.4% vs 10.1%, p = 0.343).ConclusionsThe use of a surgical prophylaxis protocol with a narrower spectrum and shorter duration does not increase the incidence of surgery-related infections in neonatal patients. Despite the multidisciplinary nature of the professionals caring for these patients, the development and implementation of this new protocol have been feasible in our setting.

新生儿手术的抗生素预防:基于“越少越好”的新方案实施的评估。
手术部位感染与术后发病率和死亡率增加、住院时间延长和费用增加有关。新生儿的免疫系统不成熟,使他们成为易感人群。关于手术预防在这个年龄组的证据是有限的,这导致我们使用广谱抗生素治疗延长时间。目的:基于儿科和成人人群的现有证据,评估一种新的新生儿手术预防方案的影响,该方案旨在限制抗生素处方在有限的时间内适用于该指征。材料和方法进行了一项病例(2022年3月至2023年3月接受新方案的干预组)和一项对照(2019年3月至2020年3月接受当时已有预防措施的历史队列)研究。分析围生期和手术变量、预防性抗生素治疗、方案依从性和感染并发症。结果干预组90例,对照组116例,分析结果具有可比性。方案的改变导致抗生素治疗持续时间的减少和累积剂量的减少(72小时vs 48小时,p < 0.001),而感染并发症的增加(6.4% vs 10.1%, p = 0.343)。结论采用较窄范围和较短时间的手术预防方案不会增加新生儿手术相关感染的发生率。尽管护理这些患者的专业人员具有多学科性质,但在我们的环境中,这项新方案的发展和实施是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine
Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信