{"title":"Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions to Improve Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Hypertension - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Geraldo Surya, Angelica, Widya Norma Insani","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S530575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the advancement of digital technologies, pharmacist-led digital health interventions (DHI) have emerged as a promising strategy to improve hypertension management. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from December 1996 to May 2024, identified via PubMed by incorporating key concepts including DHIs, pharmaceutical care, and hypertension. The review included RCTs assessed telephone-, web-, or mobile-based pharmacist-led DHI compared to usual care (UC). Primary outcomes included blood pressure (BP) reduction, medication adherence, and identification of drug-related problems (DRPs). Following the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, with interventions categorized as telephone monitoring (n = 6), web-based interventions (n = 5), and mobile-based interventions (n = 3). Eight studies (57.14%) showed significant BP reduction in the intervention group (IG), one (7.14%) reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction only, and one found no significant BP difference between IG and control group (CG). One study reported a higher BP control rate in the IG (OR = 3.64). All studies evaluating adherence (n = 5) showed improvements, and one reported enhanced DRP identification. We identified that interventions' effectiveness is influenced by frequency of the intervention, personalization, and patient engagement. Designing an intervention compatible with each patient and providing sufficient guidance may improve effectiveness. As most studies were conducted in high-income countries, further research is needed to ensure the applicability of DHIs in diverse settings. In conclusion, pharmacist-led DHIs demonstrate potential in improving hypertension outcomes, with further validation required to support their implementation across varied healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5275-5287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S530575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the advancement of digital technologies, pharmacist-led digital health interventions (DHI) have emerged as a promising strategy to improve hypertension management. This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from December 1996 to May 2024, identified via PubMed by incorporating key concepts including DHIs, pharmaceutical care, and hypertension. The review included RCTs assessed telephone-, web-, or mobile-based pharmacist-led DHI compared to usual care (UC). Primary outcomes included blood pressure (BP) reduction, medication adherence, and identification of drug-related problems (DRPs). Following the modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, fourteen RCTs met inclusion criteria, with interventions categorized as telephone monitoring (n = 6), web-based interventions (n = 5), and mobile-based interventions (n = 3). Eight studies (57.14%) showed significant BP reduction in the intervention group (IG), one (7.14%) reported diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction only, and one found no significant BP difference between IG and control group (CG). One study reported a higher BP control rate in the IG (OR = 3.64). All studies evaluating adherence (n = 5) showed improvements, and one reported enhanced DRP identification. We identified that interventions' effectiveness is influenced by frequency of the intervention, personalization, and patient engagement. Designing an intervention compatible with each patient and providing sufficient guidance may improve effectiveness. As most studies were conducted in high-income countries, further research is needed to ensure the applicability of DHIs in diverse settings. In conclusion, pharmacist-led DHIs demonstrate potential in improving hypertension outcomes, with further validation required to support their implementation across varied healthcare systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.