Comparison of Augmented Reality-Based and Conventional Training Methods for Radiographic Positioning in Second-Year Radiologic Technology Students in Japan.

IF 2 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shin Nagamata
{"title":"Comparison of Augmented Reality-Based and Conventional Training Methods for Radiographic Positioning in Second-Year Radiologic Technology Students in Japan.","authors":"Shin Nagamata","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Japanese training schools for radiologic technologists, improving students' practical skills presents an educational challenge. To address this issue, an augmented reality (AR)-based visual assistance tool for radiographic positioning training was developed. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a previously developed AR tool with conventional training methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-seven second-year radiologic technology students were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group (n = 29) trained with AR and a control group (n = 28) trained with physical auxiliary tools. Both groups practised positioning the torso at 35° and 45° for 1.5 min each. The timeframe aligned with the typical time allocated to each student during traditional hands-on training. Proficiency tests were conducted 1 and 4 weeks after training to evaluate the accuracy of the angles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test conducted 1 week after training, the experimental group demonstrated significantly smaller errors than the control group (p = 0.002). However, in the test administered 4 weeks after training, although the experimental group continued to show smaller errors, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AR-based training can enhance radiographic positioning training. However, a single brief session is considered insufficient for maintaining long-term learning effects. Continuous use of AR is warranted for achieving long-term educational effectiveness. Future research is needed to optimise AR training methods and determine the impact on students' clinical training performance and postgraduate proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Japanese training schools for radiologic technologists, improving students' practical skills presents an educational challenge. To address this issue, an augmented reality (AR)-based visual assistance tool for radiographic positioning training was developed. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a previously developed AR tool with conventional training methods.

Methods: Fifty-seven second-year radiologic technology students were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group (n = 29) trained with AR and a control group (n = 28) trained with physical auxiliary tools. Both groups practised positioning the torso at 35° and 45° for 1.5 min each. The timeframe aligned with the typical time allocated to each student during traditional hands-on training. Proficiency tests were conducted 1 and 4 weeks after training to evaluate the accuracy of the angles.

Results: In the test conducted 1 week after training, the experimental group demonstrated significantly smaller errors than the control group (p = 0.002). However, in the test administered 4 weeks after training, although the experimental group continued to show smaller errors, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.066).

Conclusion: AR-based training can enhance radiographic positioning training. However, a single brief session is considered insufficient for maintaining long-term learning effects. Continuous use of AR is warranted for achieving long-term educational effectiveness. Future research is needed to optimise AR training methods and determine the impact on students' clinical training performance and postgraduate proficiency.

日本放射技术二年级学生基于增强现实和传统放射定位训练方法的比较。
在日本的放射技师培训学校,提高学生的实践技能是一项教育挑战。为了解决这一问题,开发了一种基于增强现实(AR)的放射定位培训视觉辅助工具。本研究旨在评估和比较先前开发的AR工具与传统训练方法的有效性。方法:57名放射学二年级学生随机分为两组:实验组(n = 29)采用AR训练,对照组(n = 28)采用物理辅助工具训练。两组都练习将躯干放置在35°和45°各1.5分钟。时间框架与传统实践训练中分配给每个学生的典型时间一致。训练后第1周和第4周进行熟练程度测试,以评估角度的准确性。结果:在训练后1周进行的测试中,实验组的误差明显小于对照组(p = 0.002)。然而,在训练后4周进行的测试中,虽然实验组的误差继续变小,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.066)。结论:基于ar的训练可以强化x线定位训练。然而,一次短暂的学习被认为不足以维持长期的学习效果。为了实现长期的教育效果,必须持续使用增强现实技术。未来的研究需要优化AR培训方法,确定对学生临床培训绩效和研究生水平的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信