Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of initial thrombectomy approaches for acute anterior large vessel occlusions: a comparative network analysis of techniques.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Elvan Wiyarta, Mohammad Kurniawan, Rakhmad Hidayat, Affan Priyambodo Permana, Gideon Hot Partogi Sinaga, Refael Alfa Budiman, Gamaliel Wibowo Soetanto
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of initial thrombectomy approaches for acute anterior large vessel occlusions: a comparative network analysis of techniques.","authors":"Elvan Wiyarta, Mohammad Kurniawan, Rakhmad Hidayat, Affan Priyambodo Permana, Gideon Hot Partogi Sinaga, Refael Alfa Budiman, Gamaliel Wibowo Soetanto","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) strokes represent a critical challenge in stroke management. Advancements in thrombectomy strategies, including contact aspiration (CA), stent retrievers (SR), and their combination (SRA), particularly with the addition of balloon guide catheters (BGC), aim to enhance outcomes. This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of these first-line thrombectomy strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed across nine databases up to March 15, 2025, yielding 44 studies with 19 268 participants. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted, presenting odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs and ranking interventions via surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Outcomes included recanalization success (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3), first-pass effect (FPE), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at 90 days), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SRA+BGC was most effective for achieving mTICI 2b-3 (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.20, SUCRA 90.1) and FPE (OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.71 to 39.71, SUCRA 91.0). CA+BGC yielded the highest odds of functional independence at 90 days (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.41, SUCRA 88.1) and the lowest 90-day mortality (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.95). Safety outcomes favored SR+BGC and SRA+BGC for reducing sICH (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.91, SUCRA 85.3). CA alone was associated with significant improvements over SR in functional outcomes (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.83, SUCRA 78.5), but SRA alone was linked to higher mortality (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thrombectomy strategies incorporating BGC, particularly CA+BGC and SRA+BGC, achieve superior efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with acute ACLVO stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023769","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) strokes represent a critical challenge in stroke management. Advancements in thrombectomy strategies, including contact aspiration (CA), stent retrievers (SR), and their combination (SRA), particularly with the addition of balloon guide catheters (BGC), aim to enhance outcomes. This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of these first-line thrombectomy strategies.

Methods: A systematic search was performed across nine databases up to March 15, 2025, yielding 44 studies with 19 268 participants. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted, presenting odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs and ranking interventions via surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Outcomes included recanalization success (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3), first-pass effect (FPE), functional independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤2 at 90 days), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality.

Results: SRA+BGC was most effective for achieving mTICI 2b-3 (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.20, SUCRA 90.1) and FPE (OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.71 to 39.71, SUCRA 91.0). CA+BGC yielded the highest odds of functional independence at 90 days (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.41, SUCRA 88.1) and the lowest 90-day mortality (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.95). Safety outcomes favored SR+BGC and SRA+BGC for reducing sICH (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.91, SUCRA 85.3). CA alone was associated with significant improvements over SR in functional outcomes (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.83, SUCRA 78.5), but SRA alone was linked to higher mortality (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.66).

Conclusion: Thrombectomy strategies incorporating BGC, particularly CA+BGC and SRA+BGC, achieve superior efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with acute ACLVO stroke.

评估急性前大血管闭塞初始取栓入路的有效性和安全性:技术的比较网络分析。
背景:急性前循环大血管闭塞(ACLVO)卒中是卒中管理的一个关键挑战。血栓切除策略的进步,包括接触抽吸(CA)、支架回收器(SR)和它们的组合(SRA),特别是球囊引导导管(BGC)的加入,旨在提高预后。本系统综述和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析评估了这些一线取栓策略的有效性和安全性。方法:截至2025年3月15日,对9个数据库进行系统检索,获得44项研究,19268名参与者。随机对照试验采用rob2.0评估偏倚风险,观察性研究采用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。进行贝叶斯随机效应网络meta分析,获得95% ci的优势比(OR),并通过累积排序曲线(SUCRA)下的表面对干预进行排序。结果包括再通成功(改良的脑梗死溶血栓(mTICI) 2b-3)、首次通过效果(FPE)、功能独立性(改良的Rankin量表90天≤2)、症状性颅内出血(sICH)和90天死亡率。结果:SRA+BGC最有效地实现mTICI 2b-3 (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.64 ~ 5.20, SUCRA 90.1)和FPE (OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.71 ~ 39.71, SUCRA 91.0)。CA+BGC在90天功能独立的几率最高(OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.16至3.41,SUCRA 88.1), 90天死亡率最低(OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20至0.95)。安全性结果支持SR+BGC和SRA+BGC减少sICH (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 - 0.91, SUCRA 85.3)。与SR相比,单独CA与功能结局的显著改善相关(OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09 - 1.83, SUCRA 78.5),但单独SRA与更高的死亡率相关(OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.06 - 2.66)。结论:合并BGC的取栓策略,特别是CA+BGC和SRA+BGC,在急性ACLVO脑卒中患者中具有更优的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信