Marika Hancock, Cayden Beyer, Michael Fuchs, Mukesh Harisinghani, Prasun Jalal, Michael Ndaa, Niharika Samala, Jose D Vargas, Arjun Jayaswal
{"title":"Corrected T1 (cT1) is the most appropriate diagnosis and monitoring tool for widespread adoption of resmetirom treatment in the United States.","authors":"Marika Hancock, Cayden Beyer, Michael Fuchs, Mukesh Harisinghani, Prasun Jalal, Michael Ndaa, Niharika Samala, Jose D Vargas, Arjun Jayaswal","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2550113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the first treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), resmetirom, without clarifying the most effective strategy for diagnosing or monitoring response to therapy. Current standards-of-care (SoC) for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare patients largely rely on vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and/or liver biopsy. Multiparametric MRI corrected T1 (cT1) is a cost-effective, noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) tool in MASH. We evaluated the budgetary impact of pathways using cT1 versus SoC (liver biopsy or VCTE) to assign suspected MASH patients to resmetirom and for those assigned treatment, monitor response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model of the VHA and Medicare populations was used to derive a budget impact comparing cT1, VCTE and liver biopsy. Clinical and cost data were taken from publicly available sources and used to estimate the number of patients prescribed resmetirom, the identification of those benefiting from therapy, the budgetary impact of each diagnosis and monitoring strategy and the cost of medication prescribed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the VHA, cT1 resulted in the lowest per-patient costs ($7,022 (cT1) vs $7,268 (liver biopsy) vs $28,509 (VCTE)), with results remaining consistent across scenario analyses. In the Medicare population, cT1 also resulted in the lowest per-patient costs ($11,866 (cT1) vs $15,488 (biopsy) vs $27,539 (VCTE)) and these results also remained consistent across scenario analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of cT1 to assign and monitor resmetirom treatment improves treatment allocation and reduces health system cost vs VCTE and liver biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"1370-1387"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2550113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the first treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), resmetirom, without clarifying the most effective strategy for diagnosing or monitoring response to therapy. Current standards-of-care (SoC) for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare patients largely rely on vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and/or liver biopsy. Multiparametric MRI corrected T1 (cT1) is a cost-effective, noninvasive liver disease assessment (NILDA) tool in MASH. We evaluated the budgetary impact of pathways using cT1 versus SoC (liver biopsy or VCTE) to assign suspected MASH patients to resmetirom and for those assigned treatment, monitor response.
Methods: A model of the VHA and Medicare populations was used to derive a budget impact comparing cT1, VCTE and liver biopsy. Clinical and cost data were taken from publicly available sources and used to estimate the number of patients prescribed resmetirom, the identification of those benefiting from therapy, the budgetary impact of each diagnosis and monitoring strategy and the cost of medication prescribed.
Results: For the VHA, cT1 resulted in the lowest per-patient costs ($7,022 (cT1) vs $7,268 (liver biopsy) vs $28,509 (VCTE)), with results remaining consistent across scenario analyses. In the Medicare population, cT1 also resulted in the lowest per-patient costs ($11,866 (cT1) vs $15,488 (biopsy) vs $27,539 (VCTE)) and these results also remained consistent across scenario analyses.
Conclusion: The use of cT1 to assign and monitor resmetirom treatment improves treatment allocation and reduces health system cost vs VCTE and liver biopsy.
目的:美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)最近批准了首个治疗代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)的药物雷司替罗,但没有明确诊断或监测治疗反应的最有效策略。目前退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)和医疗保险患者的护理标准(SoC)很大程度上依赖于振动控制瞬态弹性成像(VCTE)和/或肝脏活检。多参数MRI校正T1 (cT1)是一种低成本、无创的肝脏疾病评估(NILDA)工具。我们使用cT1和SoC(肝活检或VCTE)评估了路径的预算影响,将疑似MASH患者分配给雷司替罗,并对分配治疗的患者监测反应。方法:使用VHA和Medicare人群模型来比较cT1, VCTE和肝活检,得出预算影响。临床和费用数据取自可公开获得的来源,用于估计开出雷司替罗的患者人数、确定从治疗中受益的患者、每种诊断和监测策略的预算影响以及开出的药物费用。结果:对于VHA, cT1导致最低的每位患者成本(7,022美元(cT1) vs 7,268美元(肝活检)vs 28,509美元(VCTE)),各方案分析的结果保持一致。在医疗保险人群中,cT1也导致最低的每位患者成本(11,866美元(cT1) vs 15,488美元(活检)vs 27,539美元(VCTE)),这些结果在各场景分析中也保持一致。结论:与VCTE和肝活检相比,使用cT1分配和监测治疗可改善治疗分配并降低卫生系统成本。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication.
Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience