Freedom and mosquito control: when opting out constitutes a veto of public health interventions.

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Parker Crutchfield, Casey Chmura
{"title":"Freedom and mosquito control: when opting out constitutes a veto of public health interventions.","authors":"Parker Crutchfield, Casey Chmura","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the climate continues to change, mosquito-borne illness will spread, especially in temperate areas. The most effective method of disease-preventing mosquito control is the community-wide application of insecticides. Although these chemicals are justifiably believed to be safe, some health agencies allow individuals to opt out of receiving the public health intervention. Unlike other public health interventions that allow opt-outs, we argue that allowing opt-outs may could undermine the efficacy of the intervention result in a net loss of freedom. Therefore, the ability to opt out should be limited in certain circumstances, which we outline in this discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16317,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Ethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the climate continues to change, mosquito-borne illness will spread, especially in temperate areas. The most effective method of disease-preventing mosquito control is the community-wide application of insecticides. Although these chemicals are justifiably believed to be safe, some health agencies allow individuals to opt out of receiving the public health intervention. Unlike other public health interventions that allow opt-outs, we argue that allowing opt-outs may could undermine the efficacy of the intervention result in a net loss of freedom. Therefore, the ability to opt out should be limited in certain circumstances, which we outline in this discussion.

自由和蚊虫控制:选择退出构成对公共卫生干预的否决。
随着气候的持续变化,蚊媒疾病将会蔓延,尤其是在温带地区。防治蚊患的最有效方法是在社区广泛使用杀虫剂。尽管人们有理由相信这些化学品是安全的,但一些卫生机构允许个人选择不接受公共卫生干预。与其他允许选择退出的公共卫生干预不同,我们认为,允许选择退出可能会破坏干预的效力,导致自由的净损失。因此,在某些情况下,选择退出的能力应该受到限制,我们在本次讨论中概述了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Ethics
Journal of Medical Ethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Ethics is a leading international journal that reflects the whole field of medical ethics. The journal seeks to promote ethical reflection and conduct in scientific research and medical practice. It features articles on various ethical aspects of health care relevant to health care professionals, members of clinical ethics committees, medical ethics professionals, researchers and bioscientists, policy makers and patients. Subscribers to the Journal of Medical Ethics also receive Medical Humanities journal at no extra cost. JME is the official journal of the Institute of Medical Ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信