{"title":"The Prophylactic Effect of Acupuncture for Migraine Without Aura: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mingsheng Sun, Chaorong Xie, Yanan Wang, Xuguang Yang, Linlin Dong, Taipin Guo, Xiaoqin Chen, Jing Luo, Yutong Zhang, Xixiu Ni, Lu Liu, Jiao Chen, Siyuan Zhou, Ling Zhao","doi":"10.1111/jebm.70059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acupuncture is recognized as an effective migraine treatment, but the comparative long-term efficacy of different acupuncture methods at identical acupoints remains unclear. This study investigates the prophylactic effects of manual acupuncture (manual penetrating acupuncture, MPA) versus sham acupuncture (non-penetrating acupuncture, NPA) at the same acupoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial conducted across four Chinese clinical centers (May 2020 to September 2022), 192 migraineurs without aura (International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition criteria) were randomized 1:1 to 12 sessions of MPA or NPA. Primary outcome was the change from baseline in migraine attack frequency at week 16; secondary outcomes included migraine attack frequency, responder rates, migraine days, and pain intensity (every 4 weeks), etc. Trial registration: No. ChiCTR2000032308.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 participants were randomly allocated to either MPA or NPA groups, 99 in each group. At 16 weeks, the change in MPA showed a greater reduction in migraine attacks versus NPA (mean difference [MD] = -0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5 to 0.05; p = 0.069). MPA demonstrated superior responder rates (risk difference = 17.2%, 95% CI 5.2 to 29.1; p = 0.007) and pain reduction (MD = -0.6, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.2; p = 0.003) after treatment. At follow-up, MPA improved all migraine symptoms and some quality of life compared with NPA. Adverse events occurred in 5.1% of MPA participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although MPA and NPA showed comparable preventive effects, MPA provided sustained symptom relief and quality-of-life improvements. Therefore, suitable acupoint selection establishes therapeutic potential, whereas acupuncture methods critically determine long-term clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e70059"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.70059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Acupuncture is recognized as an effective migraine treatment, but the comparative long-term efficacy of different acupuncture methods at identical acupoints remains unclear. This study investigates the prophylactic effects of manual acupuncture (manual penetrating acupuncture, MPA) versus sham acupuncture (non-penetrating acupuncture, NPA) at the same acupoints.
Methods: In this multicenter, single-blind randomized controlled trial conducted across four Chinese clinical centers (May 2020 to September 2022), 192 migraineurs without aura (International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition criteria) were randomized 1:1 to 12 sessions of MPA or NPA. Primary outcome was the change from baseline in migraine attack frequency at week 16; secondary outcomes included migraine attack frequency, responder rates, migraine days, and pain intensity (every 4 weeks), etc. Trial registration: No. ChiCTR2000032308.
Results: A total of 198 participants were randomly allocated to either MPA or NPA groups, 99 in each group. At 16 weeks, the change in MPA showed a greater reduction in migraine attacks versus NPA (mean difference [MD] = -0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.5 to 0.05; p = 0.069). MPA demonstrated superior responder rates (risk difference = 17.2%, 95% CI 5.2 to 29.1; p = 0.007) and pain reduction (MD = -0.6, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.2; p = 0.003) after treatment. At follow-up, MPA improved all migraine symptoms and some quality of life compared with NPA. Adverse events occurred in 5.1% of MPA participants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.